BidenPresident
Verified User
Interesting. Doesn't sound like the couple of philosophy classes I took. I wonder why the logic class is in the Philosophy department at many universities.
You took two logic classes. Is that right?
Interesting. Doesn't sound like the couple of philosophy classes I took. I wonder why the logic class is in the Philosophy department at many universities.
You took two logic classes. Is that right?
No just one. It was in the philosophy department where I also took philosophy.
Which is, itself heavily underlaid by logic. The inferences around rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis is the core of inferential statistics but it follows very strict rules of logic.
Thankfully the formal logic is still implicit in the underlying techniques.
Formal logic entails far more than the scientific inductive method.
That's why formal logic and theories of knowledge are taught at universities in advanced undergraduate courses.
It's an open question if induction results in universal certain knowledge, or if it just results in interpretation
As a scientist myself, I agree with Albert Einstein that scientific education should be required to include formal logic and philosopy of science, which Einstein credited with making him a better scientist.
What was the other class?
(Emphasis added)Philosophy is conducted and makes progress by way of exchanging arguments. Since they are the primary tool of their trade, philosophers better know a little something about what makes for good arguments! Logic, therefore, is essential to the practice of philosophy.
What is your area of science? That's really cool!
Geology and geophysics.
I spent 8 years training for a scientific career, and there was never any actual classwork or training in formal logic, which I believe would make a better scientist, and allow scientists to have a better grasp on the explanatory power of their theories, and on understanding what counts as a good explanation.
Just ran across this blurb:
(Emphasis added)
Reference: Introduction to Philosophy, MATTHEW KNACHEL.
https://press.rebus.community/intro...ucted and makes,to the practice of philosophy.
So? No one disputed that.
Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Philosophical arguments are rarely logical, because the basic context is itself almost never based in logic.
Philosophy does not reduce to logic.
No, logic is not the language of philosophy. Logic is just about proper inference, formal reasoning.
There I go, what? I think you are not very bright. Sorry.
Stop being so insulting. I'm growing tired of your nastiness.
I am tired of your stupidity. You took two intro classes and you think you're an expert on all aspects of philosophy.
Philosophy uses logic. This is some big insight you have?!
I never said I was an expert in anything! Why misrepresent my position just so you can insult me?
Let's revisit the quote I provided earlier from the PHILOSOPHY TEXT BOOK: "Logic, therefore, is essential to the practice of philosophy."
And grammar is essential to the practice of novel writing. So what.
I see you are not interested in a serious discussion but you are clearly playing some "troll game" here. Your behavior is starting to grow boring. I will, unfortunately, have to leave you to it as you don't seem interested in the discussion, you just want to insult people.
Thanks.