Court decisions are legally binding although they are not laws.
If NYC prohibits handguns and the Supreme Court holds that law unconstitutional, that is binding law even though you don't think the courts have that authority to interpret the Constitution.
and the Supreme Court holds that law unconstitutional, that is binding law even though you don't think the courts have that authority to interpret the Constitution.
The Supreme Court cannot write law or interpret the Constitution. They do not have that authority. See Article III. They MUST act UNDER the Constitution. They have NO authority OVER it.
It is binding law because it is in the Constitution of the United States, which the SOTNY does not recognize.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.