Paranoid? I keep most of them in a safe off my property because they are investments.
Of course you wouldn't know, and only one other person knows where I have them.
HR 127 is a way to confiscate guns
- Thread starter Bulletbob
- Start date
Paranoid? I keep most of them in a safe off my property because they are investments.
Of course you wouldn't know, and only one other person knows where I have them.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
stupid fuck standard reply from silly ass gun nuts. the only real criteria for it being labeled an assault weapon, either rifle or hand gun, is a semi-automatic that can accept high capacity magazines, or can be easily modified to do so. even a hillbilly racist trump stooge should be able to handle that definition without slobbering.
no worries
Verified User
"I wouldn't know but I'm sure someone, other than you knows, whether you know it or not".
There you go, in a safe, off your property and only one other person knows?
Way to much information to be posting to people you don't even know, on social media?
You don't know who could be reading this, they sure could figure out who you really are, where you live by your IP address.
The same with everyone.
no worries
Verified User
Those fools who entered the capitol building have nothing to do with what firearms I own. Get with the program, you know, the one you've abandoned about my firearms...
Why do you feckless snots focus on so called assault weapons which is used in less than 1% of all gun crimes while ignoring 95% of the gun problem? Illegal guns in our cities.
no worries
Verified User
Wow, "Get with the program"?
You can't connect the dots?
The insurrectionist posted their exploits on social media, took pictures with their phones.
You just posted you have guns of your property, one person knows and they are in a safe.
I don't give a fuck what firearms you own.
You're a braggart, just like the moron insurrectionist, that's the way gun nuts are, and that will be their demise.
no worries
Verified User
Yeah, jitterbugs doing drive-by shootings are using handguns or rifles?
well lets look into your clam house fag what is a assault rifle shall we
.Of note I love house daddy fag he needs no help making himself look like a uninformed more all by himself and he is so good atr it I just enjoy helping him
Is an AR 15 considered an assault rifle?
"AR-15-style rifles are NOT 'assault weapons' or 'assault rifles,' according to NSSF's website. "An assault rifle is fully automatic — a machine gun. Automatic firearms have been severely restricted from civilian ownership since 1934.
as you can see hand guns are not considered a rifle house fag , and there is no mention of high capacity mags either or being able to modify them to accept high mags either
any firearm that accepts a removable magazine can accept a magazine capacity that has to do with the mags capacity not the guns you fucking moron.
also to be a assult weapon by the governments own definition the firearm must be selective fire. for morons like house fag that means that went you pull the trigger and the gun is selective fire it will fire a burst of rounds usually 3 with one pull or keep firing until its empty.
that you house fag for displaying your extreme ignorance yet again and making your self look like idiot yet again , I also thank you for allowing me to educate a idiot like you , no need to thank me .
I know that ignorant born dumb bastards like you have been trained like a circus chimp and you cant really help it
because democrat are the major criminals that use then the gang bangers and dopers
Into the Night
Verified User
I'll just leave this paradox of yours for all to see, twit.
Into the Night
Verified User
Really?? Where?
But who defines high capacity?
Oh, and per your definition a Ruger 22 rifle is an assault rifle, now that is pure nonsense.
Into the Night
Verified User
This is the press narrative. Remember the press is doing everything it can to quash conservatives and anything Trump is doing. They won't talk about secession votes until it actually hits them in the face and they are forced to, for example. If they do talk about any of it (they know it's going on), they have to come up with a twisted narrative to make Trump look bad. They cannot talk about Biden's gaffs, problems, or his executive orders in detail much because they must try to support this idiot and the idiots around him.
A new narrative has been forced upon them, however. Time magazine, for example, is starting a push for a new narrative on the election fraud that took place by the Democrats. They admit to it all now, but they are saying it was all to 'protect the people'. So, yes, things are happening that they are forced to admit to. I expect this new narrative will be echoed by others in the mainstream media before long. Either that or it will turn on one of their own, and where does that leave them?
Meanwhile, the gaff disease that is Biden is spreading to Harris and to his press secretary, Jen Psaki. They are still deluding themselves that nothing is happening out there among the people.
You don't hear about it because the mainstream press tries to quash it. But now they are starting this new narrative. Why? Because they know they can cover up the lies of the Democrats only so long.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
It'll never pass.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The bill says anything over 10 rounds.
Agreed a Ruger 22 can be defined as an assault weapon (not rifle) per the bill.
An assault rifle is a military weapon with select fire. An 'assault weapon" is a LW fabricated term like "white privilege". It's a political term and has nothing to do with actual weapons.
You are obsessed with the talk because you follow right tight insurrectionists. They are your peeps and your normal life. We don't pay much attention because Qanon and 4 channel Infowars are not our daily fare. You do not require quashing. We simply do not read conspiracies.