uscitizen
Villified User
Atrocious to be sure. But lets not forget the fact that the liklihood of this happening would have been about zero had the Dems not exploited the kid to begin with.
sigh, just shakes head and walks off....
Atrocious to be sure. But lets not forget the fact that the liklihood of this happening would have been about zero had the Dems not exploited the kid to begin with.
No, I think that people who bring children into a politics spotlight and do not assume that the other side may do anything at all are foolish.
As for "they didn't stalk them" etc, I recently saw a movie where the camera people stalked children of a Religious Right family in order to mock and bring "fear" of them onto people who do not agree with them politically. I have seen it on both sides and condemn it from either side.
I agree, the Rs should have given the kid immunity as the left expected they would.
Which is what I said. What part of, "Yes. The republicans should have given the kid an immunity as they were expected to do by the left." means that I think they should have attacked the kid?Umm one would think that the republican party would be grown up enough to not get in a mud slinging match with a child.
Shakes head and walks off again...
Yeah SF and Damo are not very deep in the closet.
Which is what I said. What part of, "Yes. The republicans should have given the kid an immunity as they were expected to do by the left."
Means that I think they should have attacked the kid? You are getting ridiculous when you take a statement like, "Yeah, that was bad." and pretend it means. "Boy! I think they are just GREAT!"
Shakes head and backs slowly away from the insane....
It's emotive play, expecting one or the other party to not answer emotive play is preposterous.Because you and SF are presenting this as if the dems did something wrong, and the republicans should have "stayed above it all".
Give me a break! The fact is, representative examples have always been used in politics, and always will be. It is a simple and important attemtp to humanize the statistic.
I personally think the right went bugf*ck nuts because the kid was white! Their time-honored methods for demonizing social programs have been to put a black face on them. They don't want no white kid out there, saying, look at me, I'm just like YOUR kid.
They went crazy, over something that is absolutely normal and done all the time in politics. The democrats did NOTHING wrong. This is not a case of, well the dems did something low class but what can you expect from them? the r's should have stayed above the fray.
You are doing false equivalence here Damo.
It's emotive play, expecting one or the other party to not answer emotive play is preposterous.
And How would Damo and SF react if the dems attacked the legless Vet on the pro Iraq war commercial ?
The same way. I wish they wouldn't use those things.And How would Damo and SF react if the dems attacked the legless Vet on the pro Iraq war commercial ?
Its the stalking part that's creepy. Showing up at the kids house...interogating the neighbors...checking the county assessor's office on the value of their property...calling the kids house.
To my knowledge, no democratic groups have ever stalked a small business owner and his family to see if he really "deserved" those tax cuts bush gave him.
It's awful. Really creepy.
They should react with outrage, if anyone did any such thing.
I feel sorry for the guy. It sickens me that fat bloviaters who yellowed out of their own war (vietnam) use this poor guy's sacrifice to hide behind.
But I feel nothing other than a terrible sadness for the man himself. If anyone attacked him, I would say they have their own sickness.
To be fair, someone on this thread made a really good point: Its partly the kid's own fault for getting stalked, because he made a radio address in favor of the Democratic SCHIP bill.
Dressing up your 8 year old and teaching her to act like a sex object while parading on a stage may contribute to the fact that some horrific sex offenders will have more access to their photographs, etc.yep and those 8 yr old girls dressed in revealing clothes are the cause of child molestors too....
You know what's amazing about this whole thing? This is what Rush said:
"On his radio show yesterday, Rush introduced his hit job on Graeme by saying, “I had some rudimentary information on this two weeks ago, and it wasn’t enough for me to trust going with. But since then, it has been verified, and most of it’s been verified by a ‘Freeper’ at Free Republic.”
Free republic is a political message board, like this one, only larger. The rabid right hangs out there. What I'm saying is, Rush Limbaugh, went with something that had been "verified" by a person who could very well have been BattleBorne. (cypress, it could have been alec!) Think about that.
Obviously freepers gets a lot of attention in the right wing machine, the limbaughs the malkins, and such. Now, if for some reason one of those nuts decided to start reading this board, they could "go live with the news, confirmed by BB on JPP" that CodePink are terrorist supporters and vegetarians are a threat to america.
That is what happened here. That is exactly what happened here. And that should scare anybody.