LOL!
No, it's not a state issue and you can't explain how the Constitution says it is.
A virus doesn't give a shit if you're in Texas or Maine. Diabetes is the same in New Hampshire as it is in California.
Health care is a national issue because cancer doesn't recognize state borders.
I'm not real sure how you claiming compassion by wanting to spend someone else's money is related to the public welfare.
Can you show me where the list of delegated authorities of Congress it says they have the power to deal with healthcare?
I can, however, show you where the Constitution says that powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the States.
So the Constitution is not sacrosanct, then.
Which means your weirdo interpretation of it isn't the baseline either.
In fact, Medicare's entire existence destroys your argument about health care being a state issue.
Do people in Seattle get a different kind of flu than people in Miami?
You're the one whining about how it's done. You laughably say health care is a state issue while ignoring the federal Medicare program.
Once again, this becomes about an accommodation of your fragility. You need to have your shitty argument accommodated because you think you're entitled to make it. Well, entitlements are earned and you've done abso-fucking-lutely nothing to earn an accommodation.
Healthcare becomes a national issue when the Constitution gives Congress that authority not when bleeding hearts like you claim it is.
Grow the fuck up.
You don't even pay for your own health care. Someone else's money does. You said so yourself.
It already is a national issue and has been since 1965 when Medicare was put in place as an amendment to the Constitutional Social Security Act of 1935.
Your problem is that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You just repeat the same platitudes from 10 years ago and haven't changed your position to reflect your argument's and belief's inconsistencies and losses.
Health care is general welfare.
No one ever said it couldn't be changed. However, the founders that wrote it gave a process by which the change should take place. It isn't an easy one and can take a long time. Your problem is that when you don't like something the Constitution establishes you think it should change like the weather
Medicare's existence is nothing more than the federal government going beyond its authority.
How sickness works has nothing to do with how the Constitution is supposed to operate
Sigh...
So...you have nothing to contribute here. You're just repeating whatever mangled garbage you've gleaned off the posts of more articulate Conservative morons.
The General Welfare clause would apply to health care.
So you're done and your argument is toast.
I, unlike all you fucking freeloaders unwilling to do for yourselves, don't expect to be accommodated. I'm more than willing to do for myself which is steps above what you can or are willing to do for yourself.
Sure it does, because health isn't a state issue. Viruses don't recognize state borders, idiot.
There you go again thinking compensation has to be in dollars and cents.
PLEASE!
All you've done here is argue that your bullshit arguments should be accommodated because you want them to. You need your arguments to be accommodated because you contribute nothing of value to society, but want to feel important, like you do. But you don't even pay for your own health care. So you're whining about Medicare-for-All, and paying for people who don't work, when someone else pays for your health care.
The cognitive dissonance is strong with you.
LOL!
You don't physically pay for your health care. And your employer could decide today to stop paying for it. What would happen then? Who would pay for it?
I admit the federal government went beyond its authority. You haven't realized it yet.
Can you show me the words social security in the Constitution? How about Medicare? How about food stamps?
That is your opinion without any facts to back it up.