I am currently in a state of intoxiacation

F

FUCK THE POLICE

911 EVERY DAY
This is the truth, and the truth is not a lie. See, it is possible to spell correctly while drunk. I have proven this, proven for all time, for all the ages, and it shall never be untrue again. What a great deed I have done, to conquer this falsity, have I not? Will you sing of my deed in times to come?
 
General Sherman said:
This is the truth, and the truth is not a lie. See, it is possible to spell correctly while drunk. I have proven this, proven for all time, for all the ages, and it shall never be untrue again. What a great deed I have done, to conquer this falsity, have I not? Will you sing of my deed in times to come?
Click to expand...

intoxiacation

:palm:
 
QUESTION TIME FOR WATERMARK

1. Name 3 of your favorite movies from the 90's
2. What's your greatest fear (don't say something retarded)
3. If you ever ended up killing somebody, what would it be for?
4. Would you rather be able to read the minds of animals as if they were speaking english, or would you rather have the ability to communicate to the animals and have them perfectly comprehend and understand you?
5. Would you rather be able to freeze time for 10 minutes one per day, or would you rather have the ability to rewind an hour?
 
They're gonna put it down said:
QUESTION TIME FOR WATERMARK

1. Name 3 of your favorite movies from the 90's
2. What's your greatest fear (don't say something retarded)
3. If you ever ended up killing somebody, what would it be for?
4. Would you rather be able to read the minds of animals as if they were speaking english, or would you rather have the ability to communicate to the animals and have them perfectly comprehend and understand you?
5. Would you rather be able to freeze time for 10 minutes one per day, or would you rather have the ability to rewind an hour?
Click to expand...

1 the 90s sucked.
2 that your mom will stop bangin me.
3 jaywalking.
3 neither.
4 both.
 
your answers are most displeasing. I award you 1/5.

Bill Maher did an awesome video on mississippi last night. LOL. Holy shit I would never want to live there:

 
god why the fuck did we not let you guys secede. Why are we letting you fucking mouthbreathers hold us back from greatness. It depresses me so much.
 
They're gonna put it down said:
god why the fuck did we not let you guys secede. Why are we letting you fucking mouthbreathers hold us back from greatness. It depresses me so much.
Click to expand...

My God, no wonder Watermark is so screwed up. I must admit it is mind boggling to me that Lincoln wanted to keep states like Mississippi in the Union, is it too late to allow them to secede?
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
My God, no wonder Watermark is so screwed up. I must admit it is mind boggling to me that Lincoln wanted to keep states like Mississippi in the Union, is it too late to allow them to secede?
Click to expand...

Build a bloody great wall round it and chuck all the right wing religious loonies over, then have a huge army of gay, black guys shoot them all.
 
Lowaicue said:
Build a bloody great wall round it and chuck all the right wing religious loonies over, then have a huge army of gay, black guys shoot them all.
Click to expand...

That lot in the video make DQ seem positively liberal by comparison, I cannot for the life of me understand why the poorest seem to be the most reactionary.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
That lot in the video make DQ seem positively liberal by comparison, I cannot for the life of me understand why the poorest seem to be the most reactionary.
Click to expand...

It's the same everywhere. The poor tend to be less well educated and cling to out dated ideas as a safety net against a world they find difficult to comprehend. They are easily led. Nations need the poor to take up arms against those who would wrest power from the powerful. Good little soldiers.
That is why socialism does NOT aim to make everyone poor. It aims to make everyone better off. Communism in China (in the early days) brought millions out of poverty, it fed millions who had never had enough food and it housed those with no roof. A brief summer to be sure but the aim was true but as with everything it was people who screwed it up.
It is capitalism that encourages the spread of poverty not socialism.
 
I would have thanked Watermark's answers, but, unfortunately, he dissed the Glourious Nineties. This is unacceptable behavior, and would have warranted a groan, but for the crack about Grind's mother.

All told, this thread is a huge success, and earns 9/10, falling just short of perfection for obvious reasons.
 
Lowaicue said:
It's the same everywhere. The poor tend to be less well educated and cling to out dated ideas as a safety net against a world they find difficult to comprehend. They are easily led. Nations need the poor to take up arms against those who would wrest power from the powerful. Good little soldiers.
That is why socialism does NOT aim to make everyone poor. It aims to make everyone better off. Communism in China (in the early days) brought millions out of poverty, it fed millions who had never had enough food and it housed those with no roof. A brief summer to be sure but the aim was true but as with everything it was people who screwed it up.
It is capitalism that encourages the spread of poverty not socialism.
Click to expand...

I don't see much socialism in Hong Kong though, actually I don't see that much in mainland China either.
 
Last edited:
Aoxomoxoa said:
My God, no wonder Watermark is so screwed up. I must admit it is mind boggling to me that Lincoln wanted to keep states like Mississippi in the Union, is it too late to allow them to secede?
Click to expand...
My history professor in college contended that the North lost the Civil War. We got to keep the south. It's been a lead anchor around this nation's neck ever since but, good lord, it would be pretty irresponsible for us to loose them on the rest of the world, wouldn't it?
 
Lowaicue said:
It's the same everywhere. The poor tend to be less well educated and cling to out dated ideas as a safety net against a world they find difficult to comprehend. They are easily led. Nations need the poor to take up arms against those who would wrest power from the powerful. Good little soldiers.
That is why socialism does NOT aim to make everyone poor. It aims to make everyone better off. Communism in China (in the early days) brought millions out of poverty, it fed millions who had never had enough food and it housed those with no roof. A brief summer to be sure but the aim was true but as with everything it was people who screwed it up.
It is capitalism that encourages the spread of poverty not socialism.
Click to expand...

How about that Great Leap Forward, eh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top