I had lunch today with Bill Barr.

They were declassified. He declassified them when he declassified everything pertaining to the Russiagate scam

Why has Trump refused to say in a court of law that he has declassified them?

By the way, if you bothered to read the law then you would know having information that can be used to harm the US is the crime. It doesn't need to be classified. But the biggest problem for Trump is his refusal to comply with the subpoena which asked for documents with classification markings. If the document contains classification markings it is covered by the subpoena even if he had declassified it.
 
Why has Trump refused to say in a court of law that he has declassified them?

By the way, if you bothered to read the law then you would know having information that can be used to harm the US is the crime. It doesn't need to be classified. But the biggest problem for Trump is his refusal to comply with the subpoena which asked for documents with classification markings. If the document contains classification markings it is covered by the subpoena even if he had declassified it.

Trump de-classified the documents and he hasn't been asked in a court of law, dummy.
 
Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to the law.

Correct. Ignorance of the law is no excuse when people claim a law was broken. Perhaps they need to stop being ignorant of the law and actually read the law.
Someone can't be found guilty of a law that requires willful intent if you can't prove willful intent.
 
Trump de-classified the documents and he hasn't been asked in a court of law, dummy.

ROFLMAO. Actually, his lawyers were asked. They refused to make that claim.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/21/trump-special-master-documents-declassified
But Dearie said that if Trump’s lawyers will not actually assert that the records have been declassified, and the department of justice makes an acceptable case that they remain classified, he will be inclined to regard them as classified.

“As far as I’m concerned,” he said, “that’s the end of it.”

https://time.com/6215223/special-master-mar-a-lago-documents-classified/
Trump has claimed publicly that he declassified the government records that were taken from Mar-a-Lago. Trump’s legal team has not made such an argument in ongoing litigation surrounding access to the documents, and in court filings on Monday his team said they opposed having to shortly disclose “specific information regarding declassification,” as the Justice Department (DOJ) had requested,
 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/specific_intent

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/specific-and-general-intent-crimes.html
specific intent crimes will require a prosecutor to prove that a defendant had both the desire to commit the act as well as the knowledge or intent that committing the act would achieve the end result.


https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/what-are-specific-intent-crimes/
While PC 470 uses the language, “intent to defraud,” other common intents listed in statutes include that the defendant acted:

knowingly,
purposely,
willfully, or
with recklessness.

If an accused did not break the law with one of these intent elements, then he/she cannot be found guilty of a specific intent offense.
 
Trump de-classified the documents and he hasn't been asked in a court of law, dummy.

Trump did not. There is a procedure and Trump certainly did not follow it. They were simply not declassified. I thought Trumpp was nuts when he said he could declassify everything by thinking about it. It seemed so stupid. I was certain nobody was dumb enough to think that made sense. We have a few people here who think that is how declassifying works. It is amazing.
 
Interesting guy, said he really liked trumps policies but, “wow what an asshole”.

I don’t agree with him on a lot, but he was refreshingly, honest for a Washington insider. I was impressed by that.

He said he doesn’t think they can get him on anything related to January 6, but he is in bad trouble on the classified documents.

Yeah, sure you did. :wink wink:

How is this anecdotal bullshit a current event?
 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/specific_intent

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/specific-and-general-intent-crimes.html
specific intent crimes will require a prosecutor to prove that a defendant had both the desire to commit the act as well as the knowledge or intent that committing the act would achieve the end result.


https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/what-are-specific-intent-crimes/
While PC 470 uses the language, “intent to defraud,” other common intents listed in statutes include that the defendant acted:

knowingly,
purposely,
willfully, or
with recklessness.

If an accused did not break the law with one of these intent elements, then he/she cannot be found guilty of a specific intent offense.

Well, them classified documents back from when Biden was a Senator didn't find their way to his garage by osmosis.
 
Well, them classified documents back from when Biden was a Senator didn't find their way to his garage by osmosis.

Biden said he didn't know they were there. No one has any evidence he did know.
That makes it hard to prosecute a specific intent crime.

He had them returned when they were discovered. That means it can't be a retention crime.
 
That they were in a box and no one knew they were there isn't a crime. For it to be a crime there has to be specific intent. Willfully and knowingly are the terms in the law.

Biden told veterans that as the VP he gave his uncle a Purple Heart that his uncle earned in the battle of the bulge and that his uncle refused the medal because his fellow soldiers "died." The problem is his uncle died 9 years before Biden took office as VP and never earned a Purple Heart. So you trust the word of this chronic liar? :rofl2: Biden either removed Classified Document from a SCIF or from under the nose of a National Archive person in Biden's office. Man...are you ever an idiot. No wonder why Biden can fool you. You are even more stupid than he is.
 
Back
Top