I have a question for the progressives here.

Questions and answers comprise dialogue.

I do mostly monologue on this forum so such things don't apply.


Discourse with humans is difficult enough; with trumpanzees, it's essentially impossible.

They use English words, sometimes even spelled properly, but not in any way that suggests that they know the meaning of those words.

Internet fora should consider administering vocabulary tests before processing registrations.

Bandwidth shouldn't be wasted on idiots. It's long past due to set standards.
 
Last edited:
NiftyNiblick said:
Questions and answers comprise dialogue.

I do mostly monologue on this forum so such things don't apply.


Discourse with humans is difficult enough; with trumpanzees, it's essentially impossible.

They use English words, sometimes even spelled properly, but not in any way that suggests that they know the meaning of those words.

Internet fora should consider administering vocabulary tests before processing registrations.

Bandwidth shouldn't be wasted on idiots. It's long past due to set standards.
Click to expand...

Vocabulary tests? That means many in Boston would not pass. I like your thinking NN! Props to you sir.
 
cawacko said:
Vocabulary tests? That means many in Boston would not pass. I like your thinking NN! Props to you sir.
Click to expand...

Boston is one of the few places where almost everybody would pass.

"Fuckin' Retahd" status in Boston places one well above the crowd in crackerland.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Questions and answers comprise dialogue.

I do mostly monologue on this forum so such things don't apply.


Discourse with humans is difficult enough; with trumpanzees, it's essentially impossible.

They use English words, sometimes even spelled properly, but not in any way that suggests that they know the meaning of those words.

Internet fora should consider administering vocabulary tests before processing registrations.

Bandwidth shouldn't be wasted on idiots. It's long past due to set standards.
Click to expand...

Well, as one example of exactly what you propose that I put up here recently, I hold out this thread:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...rat-talking-points-for-November-s-election-be

Not a single response from the Progressive Left / Democrats on this board--you included--to this question other than ad hominem and insults. There was ZERO attempt by your political portion of this very board to engage in dialogue. It seems to me that you shouldn't point out the mote in God's eye when there's a beam in your own.
 
jbander said:
Now when the subject is Trump , does anyone ever get a response other then a response about Obama , Clinton or Biden's son. Or they hate you, think you are dumb and tell you that you can't spell. Has anyone ever got a real response from the right when Trump is the subject other then these 6 right wing patented kindergarten response.
Click to expand...

There's TDS as well. They cannot formulate coherent thoughts.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Well, as one example of exactly what you propose that I put up here recently, I hold out this thread:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...rat-talking-points-for-November-s-election-be

Not a single response from the Progressive Left / Democrats on this board--you included--to this question other than ad hominem and insults. There was ZERO attempt by your political portion of this very board to engage in dialogue. It seems to me that you shouldn't point out the mote in God's eye when there's a beam in your own.
Click to expand...

Your thread proves OP's point.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Boston is one of the few places where almost everybody would pass.

"Fuckin' Retahd" status in Boston places one well above the crowd in crackerland.
Click to expand...

Ok, that actually made me laugh.

A couple of weeks ago I saw a guy I went to school with that I hadn't seen in years. (He's a black dude from Oakland.) One of the first things he said to me was "Low key Cawacko, you my n*gi".

Does that rhetoric earn a pass in your book?
 
And, yet another proof of the insanity of the OP in this thread:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?185424-Remember-The-Bunker

This is another everything has to be about Trump Progressive / Leftist thread that's not worth replying to simply because it's one massively insane logical fallacy. That particular one is a non-sequitur fallacy that begs the question. So there's no need to make a formal response because it would be arguing against irrelevance rather than reason.
 
AProudLefty said:
Thank you for proving the OP's point once again. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Show me how the response I made above proves the OP's point. Here's the OP for your perusal:

Now when the subject is Trump , does anyone ever get a response other then a response about Obama , Clinton or Biden's son. Or they hate you, think you are dumb and tell you that you can't spell. Has anyone ever got a real response from the right when Trump is the subject other then these 6 right wing patented kindergarten response.
Click to expand...

So, which one of the claimed "6 right wing patented kindergarten response(s)" did I use?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Show me how the response I made above proves the OP's point. Here's the OP for your perusal:



So, which one of the claimed "6 right wing patented kindergarten response(s)" did I use?
Click to expand...

This is another everything has to be about Trump Progressive / Leftist thread that's not worth replying

As I have stated, Trump supporters cannot debate when the subject is about Trump. You employed an ad hominem fallacy as predicted.
 
AProudLefty said:
This is another everything has to be about Trump Progressive / Leftist thread that's not worth replying

As I have stated, Trump supporters cannot debate when the subject is about Trump. You employed an ad hominem fallacy as predicted.
Click to expand...

What's to debate in a post that's nothing but a logical fallacy? If the post were substantive, it might be worth a rebuttal. But one cannot make a reasonable reply to a non-sequitur that begs the question. That is, the poster starts with an irrelevant comparison and immediately makes a conclusion out of nothing.
That isn't an ad hominem fallacy as I didn't address the poster but rather the content.

Aside from all that, you still haven't demonstrated which of the supposed "6 right wing patented kindergarten response(s)" I employed. By the way, ad hominem isn't one of the six the OP listed...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What's to debate in a post that's nothing but a logical fallacy? If the post were substantive, it might be worth a rebuttal. But one cannot make a reasonable reply to a non-sequitur that begs the question. That is, the poster starts with an irrelevant comparison and immediately makes a conclusion out of nothing.
That isn't an ad hominem fallacy as I didn't address the poster but rather the content.

Aside from all that, you still haven't demonstrated which of the supposed "6 right wing patented kindergarten response(s)" I employed. By the way, ad hominem isn't one of the six the OP listed...
Click to expand...

proof of the insanity

Basically you're saying that the OP is dumb and insane. That's an ad hominem fallacy. That is a part of 6 RW responses.

President of the USA hid in a bunker.
President of Ukraine faces adversary.

What logical fallacy is that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top