I have a strong hunch about Fort Knox......

Stone said:
"GOLD shall destroy FED."
Click to expand...
The Brits are still trying to process that the people chose Trump, and the Swamp was not able to prevent it....they have no idea what to do.

Given your lack of clarity I dont know what you trying to say, but if you are trying to say that MAGA is working to destroy the Imperial Empires central bank you are nuts.

MAGA is at the very least allowing this gold transfer.
 
Last edited:
Hawkeye10 said:
What are you saying....why are there currently massive transfers of gold from London to America?
Click to expand...
Walt said:
Gold goes high when people are scared, especially of inflation, but also just scared. The more scared they are the higher it generally goes.
Click to expand...
The threat of tariffs have Americans terrified, and there are limited number of other places to put American money. If you are in London, you can convert your money into Euros or Dollars. If you are in NYC, converting into Euros or Pounds just seems like a step down.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The Brits are still trying to process that the people chose Trump, and the Swamp was not able to prevent it....they have no idea what to do.
Click to expand...
If the British were the ones panicking, gold would be going from NYC to London, not the other way around.

Hawkeye10 said:
MAGA is at the very least allowing this gold transfer.
Click to expand...
While trump has a problem with many imports, I do not think he has a problem with moving gold to the USA. It is not a conventional import situation.

What trump might try to interfere with is moving gold out of the USA. It could happen if foreign central banks decide to pull their gold deposits from NY Fed, or if foreigners decided they would rather take gold than US Dollars. Either way, it would mean gold leaving the USA, which could cause trump to panic. trump blocking gold from leaving the USA would cause more panicking, and could cause a huge collapse... Maybe I should say "would" rather than "could".
 
Walt said:
There would be a lot more doing great work under age 30, if they could get the education earlier. It just is a huge amount of education needed. By the time you are through your post-doc, you are usually about 30. Add on a few more years to build up to it, and I am surprised that 9% can get any of their prime under 30.

To do truly great work requires so much education. I sometimes worry that one day we will hit a "Hubbert Peak" for science. We can have more discoveries, but it will take more and more education for fewer and fewer discoveries.
Click to expand...
AI will help with a lot of that.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Although it varies by subject, the median age scientists do their best work is 43.


APA PsycNet

psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
The median age at time of their chief work was found to be 43. Only 9% of the whole list had their prime under 30. Median primes by science varied from 37 in mathematics to 47 in anthropology, It appears that age as a factor influencing discovery, is greatly modified by other factors such as health, leisure, apparatus, stimulus, contemporary trend of the subject, all of which may concur only at one random period of life.
Click to expand...
Science isn't 'discovery', mathematics, or age.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top