I loved making this video, physicists are so full of shit

[Matt Dillon]

Nope. Just a set of falsifiable theories. That's it. That's all.

Experiments are used to try to break a theory.

Science makes no use of supporting evidence. Only religions do that. It is not possible to prove ANY theory, scientific or otherwise, to be True. It IS possible to show a theory of science to be False. It is NOT possible to show a nonscientific theory to be False.

Some experiments are used to try to formulate a new theory, but a new theory can come from literally anywhere...even from dreams.
As long as the theory can be tested to see if it's false, and it continues to survive, it is automatically part of the body of science. It will remain so until it is falsified.

There is no voting bloc, no consensus, no peer review, no license or degree or credential, no government blessing of any kind, no politics, and no religion. Not even people. It is not any scientist or group of scientists. It is not any society or academy.

It is just the set of falsifiable theories themselves.

To be falsifiable, a theory must be able to be tested for it's null hypothesis (how can I break this theory?). The test must be definable, available, practical to conduct, specific, and produce a specific result. The theory itself must be tested.

Science has no theories about past unobserved events. There is no way to travel back in time to see what actually happened. No amount of supporting evidence will ever prove any theory True.

There are a couple of rules (not methods or procedures).

The first is called the internal consistency check. A theory is an explanatory argument (whether scientific or otherwise). No theory may contain or be based upon a fallacy. It must be a valid argument.
The second is called the external consistency check, and only involves theories of science (not nonscientific theories). No theory of science may conflict with any other theory of science. One or both MUST be falsified.

The only thing that uses supporting evidence is a religion. Science is only interested in falsifying evidence.

Uhh..I'm gonna go with the way I learned it in school. Thanks for understanding!

 

[Nordberg]

Experiments are used to back or disprove a theory. Like the experiment that required an eclipse to prove Einstein's theory. https://www.space.com/37018-solar-eclipse-proved-einstein-relativity-right.html GFM is so damn ignorant that it is scary. There are countless physics experiments that test the theories. However they come out, the theory is strengthened or requires modification. In the end, they are getting closer and closer to the core and the truth.

 

[Into the Night]

Uhh..I'm gonna go with the way I learned it in school. Thanks for understanding!

School also teaches:
* a tomato is a vegetable.
* we are all equal, but some of us are more equal than others.
* there is no god or gods.
* that there is no gender.
* how to put a condom on a banana.
* white people are oppressors.
* politically correct math problems

Maybe it's time you reconsider what you learned in school.

 

[Into the Night]

Experiments are used to back or disprove a theory.

Science does not use supporting evidence at all. Only falsifying evidence.

Like the experiment that required an eclipse to prove Einstein's theory.
https://www.space.com/37018-solar-eclipse-proved-einstein-relativity-right.html

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

GFM is so damn ignorant that it is scary. There are countless physics experiments that test the theories.

Nah. Just experiments.

However they come out, the theory is strengthened or requires modification.

No supporting evidence is ever used in science. Only religions do that. The test is designed to destroy the theory, not support it.

In the end, they are getting closer and closer to the core and the truth.

Science has no 'core'. Science has no Universal Truth. Only religions have that.

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. Nothing more. Nothing at all.

 

[Nordberg]

School also teaches:
* a tomato is a vegetable.
* we are all equal, but some of us are more equal than others.
* there is no god or gods.
* that there is no gender.
* how to put a condom on a banana.
* white people are oppressors.
* politically correct math problems

Maybe it's time you reconsider what you learned in school.

None of that is true. Zip, zero. Did you ever go to school? Were you home-schooled? Maybe,not none of it. White people have been suppressing blacks since the country was founded. Schools do not teach there is no god. But once you get past 12 years old, the missing logic will make gods go away.

 

[Nordberg]

Science does not use supporting evidence at all. Only falsifying evidence.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Nah. Just experiments.

No supporting evidence is ever used in science. Only religions do that. The test is designed to destroy the theory, not support it.

Science has no 'core'. Science has no Universal Truth. Only religions have that.

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. Nothing more. Nothing at all.

You are one stupid SOB. I gave you a perfect example of an experiment that proved what Einstein's theory said. It corroborated and proved his theory. It is just that simple. I could bury you in other examples, but even the concept of experiments eludes you. You are weird.

 

[Into the Night]

None of that is true. Zip, zero.

All of it is true.

Did you ever go to school? Were you home-schooled? Maybe,not none of it. White people have been suppressing blacks since the country was founded. Schools do not teach there is no god. But once you get past 12 years old, the missing logic will make gods go away.

QED.

 

[Into the Night]

You are one stupid SOB. I gave you a perfect example of an experiment that proved what Einstein's theory said.

Not a proof.

It corroborated and proved his theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.

It is just that simple.

No. You cannot just dictate that it is simple.

I could bury you in other examples,

Don't bother. Mountains of supporting evidence mean NOTHING in science. Only religions depend on that.

but even the concept of experiments eludes you.

Inversion fallacy.

You are weird.

Insulting people is not going to help you.

 

[Nordberg]

I do not need help. You have a special stubborn stupidity that is weird. You actually play opposites so much that it gets annoying. Experiments are designed for the specific purpose of proving a theory. If it fails, then the theory is revamped or discarded. The whole point of experimentation is to prove a theory.
Stop with the religion crap, That is a special kind of blindness you have. So all religions must be true. They have mountains of evidence in your bent mind. I thought everyone knew they are based on faith because what they claim absolutely cannot be proven. They have no proofs. Yet you keep saying the opposite. However, that is what you repeatedly do. You are weird. Playing opposites is just ridiculous. I do worry about how people like you can navigate our complicated lives.
https://lisbdnet.com/what-is-the-main-purpose-of-conducting-experiments/