I Never Saw Taxes Make A Rich Man Poor - Vaporizing The Arguments Of The Greedy Rich.

P

PoliTalker

Diversity Makes Greatness
And the other one is:

"People will move from high tax States to low tax States."

Total baloney.

Here's how that goes. The couple is filthy rich because he has always been obsessed with money. They've got it made. They already have way more than most. They are in the top 1%. Democrats in the State raise taxes because the government needs it. It doesn't hurt them. They still live in the lap of luxury, have all they need and plenty more, even with higher taxes. They have far more than they ever need or could ever spend on their lifestyle.

He says: "We need to move to nowhere-ville because they have lower taxes."

She says: "Go ahead. Buy a home there and move. I am staying here, near the grandchildren."

End of argument.
 
PoliTalker said:
And the other one is:

"People will move from high tax States to low tax States."

Total baloney.

Here's how that goes. The couple is filthy rich because he has always been obsessed with money. They've got it made. They already have way more than most. They are in the top 1%. Democrats in the State raise taxes because the government needs it. It doesn't hurt them. They still live in the lap of luxury, have all they need and plenty more, even with higher taxes. They have far more than they ever need or could ever spend on their lifestyle.

He says: "We need to move to nowhere-ville because they have lower taxes."

She says: "Go ahead. Buy a home there and move. I am staying here, near the grandchildren."

End of argument.
Click to expand...

Beautiful!

I know at least two couples where that essentially describes the situation.

In fact, often both want to stay near the grandchildren...and both often want to complain about the taxes. Much better for them to complain about high taxes than about low taxes!
 
"People will move from high tax States to low tax States."

Total baloney.
Click to expand...

Somebody in rightwing talk radio invented that theme a couple decades ago, and the Ditto heads have taken their orders and mindlessly parroted it since then.

I think I can count on one hand the number of people I have ever heard say they moved to another state because of low taxes.

Almost everyone I know who moved throughout my entire life did so because of economic opportunity, family, natural beauty, schools and education, recreation, weather, climate, and other intangibles.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hey!

This must have been a great thread!

Otherwise it would never have been plagiarized.
Click to expand...

I would take it as a compliment, that people who are thread banned or on IA still make it a point to read your threads, plagiarize them, and attempt to respond to them. They must find your writing very interesting.
 
Hello Cypress,

Cypress said:
I would take it as a compliment, that people who are thread banned or on IA still make it a point to read your threads, plagiarize them, and attempt to respond to them. They must find your writing very interesting.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Yes, I do consider it a badge of honor.

They read what I write. I don't read what they write. I win. I am getting my point across. They are not.

They are wishing they had not mouthed off so much.

I have zero need, nor desire, to read the drivel of trolls. That's why they are thread banned. No big surprise they would try to steal threads. They sure can't win on a level playing field.
 
PoliTalker said:
And the other one is:

"People will move from high tax States to low tax States."

Total baloney.

Here's how that goes. The couple is filthy rich because he has always been obsessed with money. They've got it made. They already have way more than most. They are in the top 1%. Democrats in the State raise taxes because the government needs it. It doesn't hurt them. They still live in the lap of luxury, have all they need and plenty more, even with higher taxes. They have far more than they ever need or could ever spend on their lifestyle.

He says: "We need to move to nowhere-ville because they have lower taxes."

She says: "Go ahead. Buy a home there and move. I am staying here, near the grandchildren."

End of argument.
Click to expand...

LOL. IN the next census Texas is expected to pick up at least 4, possibly 5 electors from rust belt states.
 
Cypress said:
I would take it as a compliment, that people who are thread banned or on IA still make it a point to read your threads, plagiarize them, and attempt to respond to them. They must find your writing very interesting.
Click to expand...

they learned I from me

they would ban me from most threads and I would make a new thread in which I didn't ban them


I would even get their responses at the other thread and answer them

You would be amazed at how often they couldnt resist answering me in my thread
 
evince said:
they learned I from me

they would ban me from most threads and I would make a new thread in which I didn't ban them


I would even get their responses at the other thread and answer them

You would be amazed at how often they couldnt resist answering me in my thread
Click to expand...

As much as some rightwingers are dismissive of you, you might be the most read and responded to poster in the history of jpp dot com.

Keep up the good work!
 
Hello Kacper,

Kacper said:
LOL. IN the next census Texas is expected to pick up at least 4, possibly 5 electors from rust belt states.
Click to expand...

Any reason for moving given?

Generally, it is no secret in history, when capitalism depletes the usefulness of a region, then capitalism leaves. People in search of better opportunities also leave. Governments in dwindling population areas face a challenge balancing the budget with diminished revenue. Cutting taxes doesn't usually help that.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Kacper,



Any reason for moving given?

Generally, it is no secret in history, when capitalism depletes the usefulness of a region, then capitalism leaves. People in search of better opportunities also leave. Governments in dwindling population areas face a challenge balancing the budget with diminished revenue. Cutting taxes doesn't usually help that.
Click to expand...

Electors are based on population. For Texas to be picking up electors and rust belts to be losing electors since 2010 would mean Texas has picked up a few million people that the rustbelt has lost.
 
Hello Kacper,

Hello Kacper,

Kacper said:
Electors are based on population. For Texas to be picking up electors and rust belts to be losing electors since 2010 would mean Texas has picked up a few million people that the rustbelt has lost.
Click to expand...

Yes, but it is a complete and unfounded assumption that the reason for moving is taxes.

Causality has not been shown.
 
Politalker,


what you fail to understand is the mass of the population speaks in a course way


they use invective

watch a popular cable show and you will see what I mean.

all theb political comedy shows that get good ratings speak just like my posts


You can pretend you can reach people with church speak


but that doesn't make it real



if you want to reach a population you have to speak like that population.



I am a part of that population and have always played with invective as a language tool for fun



lenny bruce



Richard pryor


george carlin



those comedians all used invective to an art and effected the political sphere far more than most preachers


speak to the people in the language they speak


or only reach a few


invective is funny


maybe not to you


but to the vast majority of Americans it is funny



a plus is creative invective confuses the Russian bots


it is NOT designed to offend you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top