I Never Saw Taxes Make A Rich Man Poor - Vaporizing The Arguments Of The Greedy Rich.

Frank Apisa said:
Are you fucking kidding here...or what?

Bonds are instruments of debt.

Someone or something (often a government) BORROWS money (which they will pay back with interest) for a project of some sort.

Bonds are the instruments whereby that happens.

If YOU borrow money to buy a car...who do you think pays for the car?
Click to expand...

Frank, shut it. You know bonds are not taxes.
 
Guille said:
Frank, shut it. You know bonds are not taxes.
Click to expand...

The bonds are obligations of the Government...

...and the payments of that debt will come from taxes.

What kind of shit do you think you are pulling here?

The bonds (let's use the federal government) are debts of the federal government...and will be paid with tax money.

Not sure what you think you are doing with this rigmarole...but it is falling way short.
 
Frank Apisa said:
The bonds are obligations of the Government...

...and the payments of that debt will come from taxes.

What kind of shit do you think you are pulling here?

The bonds (let's use the federal government) are debts of the federal government...and will be paid with tax money.

Not sure what you think you are doing with this rigmarole...but it is falling way short.
Click to expand...

Uh...the government doesn't take money and spend it that year like a lot of proggy dumbfucks think they do? Maybe that?
 
These Leftist pricks would not be happy until the "evuullll" rich (excepting of course, the Hollywierd Crowd) are paying 95-100% of all income AND earnings in taxes!
 
countryboy said:
As if that were the benchmark. You sir, are a moron.

Did you criticize John "I served in Vietnam" Kerry when he parked his yacht in a different state to avoid high taxes? No? Didn't think so.
Click to expand...

I have never seen anyone carrying a dinner bucket making payrolls with checks saying, Pay to the Order of......no one will ever get rich carrying a dinner bucket. Conclusion: You can never help the wage earner by bringing down the wage payer. Its time this left wing "Bolshevik" communist BS came to an end in the United States of America....the days of the flat nose Union Thugs are past.
 
Guille said:
Uh...the government doesn't take money and spend it that year like a lot of proggy dumbfucks think they do? Maybe that?
Click to expand...

Guille...I doubt many people here are so dumb they think that the government picks up some taxes and drops the tax money off to the construction people doing a project.

You asked me, "..how are public works projects funded?"

I replied, "Through taxes...for the most part."

I was correct.

That does not mean I thought the taxes > contractor was an immediate one...any more than someone's payments on a car loan are direct.

If bonding is done...and BONDING IS ALMOST ALWAYS DONE...the funding for the projects still come from taxes...albeit, not directly.

Almost NOTHING is done directly vis a vis the taxes government payments thingy.
 
Jack said:
Rich people hire Accountants so they DON'T have to pay Taxes.
Click to expand...

Not exactly. they hire lobbyists to get politicians to change the laws so they can evade taxes. In many cases, the lobbyists write the loophole and the politician inserts inthe back of a huge bill, like the defense bill. Nobody ever reads it and it becomes law with the big package.If someone does read it, will they vote against military appropriations to stop a loophole? Nope. No it gets in .
 
Nordberg said:
Not exactly. they hire lobbyists to get politicians to change the laws so they can evade taxes. In many cases, the lobbyists write the loophole and the politician inserts inthe back of a huge bill, like the defense bill. Nobody ever reads it and it becomes law with the big package.If someone does read it, will they vote against military appropriations to stop a loophole? Nope. No it gets in .
Click to expand...

Very accurate observation.
 
Nordberg said:
Not exactly. they hire lobbyists to get politicians to change the laws so they can evade taxes. In many cases, the lobbyists write the loophole and the politician inserts inthe back of a huge bill, like the defense bill. Nobody ever reads it and it becomes law with the big package.If someone does read it, will they vote against military appropriations to stop a loophole? Nope. No it gets in .
Click to expand...

Lol, well, they need better lobbyists, because the top earners still pay the vast majority of the federal tax load.
 
countryboy said:
Lol, well, they need better lobbyists, because the top earners still pay the vast majority of the federal tax load.
Click to expand...

How the fuck can you say something that stupid. The tax rates on the wealthy have been dropping steadily since Eisenhower's time. They pay less and less a percentage of their income. What that tells you ,is they have so damn much money that they end up paying a larger portion of the taxes collected. It is a lesson in the wealth gap, not the poor billionaires are getting hosed. The working class has had flat wages for many decades. All the profits, the largest corporate profits of all time, are going to the top. The smaller rate collects more money because they are fabulously wealthy. Damn you guys say the diumbest shit. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/economic-inequality-it-s-far-worse-than-you-think/
 
countryboy said:
Lol, no, they didn't. The founders never envisioned confiscatory taxes. That's why we fought the Revolutionary War ya dumb fuck.
Click to expand...

We fought it because of grievances against a government in which we had no representation, ya dumb fuck.

You do have a Representative and a couple of Senators, don't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top