I STILL don't understand completely WHY?

[MAGA]

Yep. And I'm not just talking about the usual beggars and thieves either. I'm also talking about a whole lot of legit businesses who signed the documents thinking that there was no way anything could ever be tracked because of the sheer volume. They were wrong. Hint hint.........most signed up listing the reason for the need for the loan to be used for PAYROLL. Thus the reason it was called the PAYROLL PROTECTION PROGRAM. In the document they signed they had to claim that they were in great NEED. The thing is though,....MANY businesses weren't slowed down AT ALL. Not one bit. Ours wasn't. Theirs weren't either.

Tic tic tic...........

There was no such provisions on round one. All you had to agree to was not to lay off your employees. It was the second round where you had to show diminished receipts that may be in trouble if they lied. But anyone who lied deserves what they get.

I took the money because I understood I was going to be paying it back regardless.

 

[MAGA]

Did it? We shall see.

We already have

 

[Hawkeye10]

Stone not understanding is pretty par for the course.

 

[FastLane]

You already did. YOU FUCKING WON THE ELECTION.

What we are seeing now is that you guys CAN'T ACTUALLY GOVERN. You have NOTHING of value to add to the world. You just want to bitch and whine.

Now you have to do something else and your movement is already FAILING MASSIVELY! LOL.

We are going to rub it in for at least the next four years.

 

[Stone]

Stone not understanding is pretty par for the course.

Said the guy who claimed for over a year straight that Trump stood no chance of winning.

 

[Stone]

Why did Democrats ever think that Kamala Harris was the best choice to lead their party in 2024 when she was every bit as unpopular as Crooked Hillary Clinton was? Worse yet,......when it comes to how she presents herself and her over all acuity she comes off as almost mildly retarded in comparison to crooked Hillary. BOTH wildly unpopular but with Crooked Hillary being head and shoulders above Kamala the idiot when it comes to intelligence and yet you somehow still thought Kamala could win? Ummm.....WUT? Seriously,....if Crooked Hillary couldn't beat Trump any idiot SHOULD have known that Kamala stood no chance. I mean,....how bad is it when They couldn't even print up enuff fake ballots in shithole Detroit to save her used up old dumb ass ? WTF is wrong with the left, just totally stupid or have they collectively all gone insane?

I will now go ahead and answer my own question...............


It is because LW voters KNOW as well as we do just how CORRUPT the Democrat apparatus really is. They thought that due to the massive corruption of their own party that it literally didn't matter who they ran for POTUS,....that they could have ran Mickey Mouse and it wouldn't have mattered. That somehow in the middle of the night the votes would all just magically get found. THAT is the true answer........

But we had a little sumpin sumpin ready and waiting just for such a scenario to shut it down before it even began.

 

[Damocles]

Harris wasn't chosen by "Democrats" as the "best choice". Biden anointed her as his price for stepping aside and Party leaders accepted her anointment, lacking the courage to hold a convention. Harris was not unpopular at the start of the campaign, she was largely unknown. Her popularity then rose, exceeding Trump's. Your analysis in those and its other respects is dimwitted.

Geebus... "exceeding Trump"... You're fricking delusional. If her popularity exceeded Trumps she would have at least won the "popular vote". She lost that, she lost every single swing state, every. single. one. Not most, not vast majority, she lost every single one of the swing states. that is not someone that was a rising star. You folks were afraid to hold a primary, coronated a dementia patient, then just chose a candidate that couldn't have won even among democrats in a primary to be your candidate. Only D Party Cultists would possibly believe that she was a rising star with "even more popularity than Trump" when she literally just lost an election to Trump.

 

[martin]

Geebus... "exceeding Trump"... You're fricking delusional. If her popularity exceeded Trumps she would have at least won the "popular vote". She lost that, she lost every single swing state, every. single. one. Not most, not vast majority, she lost every single one of the swing states. that is not someone that was a rising star. You folks were afraid to hold a primary, coronated a dementia patient, then just chose a candidate that couldn't have won even among democrats in a primary to be your candidate. Only D Party Cultists would possibly believe that she was a rising star with "even more popularity than Trump" when she literally just lost an election to Trump.

Numbers speak for themselves, Geebus. Her approval rating was higher than Trump's; she lost in a low turnout election. Too many voters liked her better than Trump but not enough to get off their asses and go to the polls.

 

[Stone]

Geebus... "exceeding Trump"... You're fricking delusional. If her popularity exceeded Trumps she would have at least won the "popular vote". She lost that, she lost every single swing state, every. single. one. Not most, not vast majority, she lost every single one of the swing states. that is not someone that was a rising star. You folks were afraid to hold a primary, coronated a dementia patient, then just chose a candidate that couldn't have won even among democrats in a primary to be your candidate. Only D Party Cultists would possibly believe that she was a rising star with "even more popularity than Trump" when she literally just lost an election to Trump.

I know,...some of the crazy stuff these people believe is just amazing. " Her popularity exceeded Trumps" WHAT?!!!!!! That's just crazy to even say! Trump won in every way he could win and they say she was more popular? How weird.

 

[Stone]

Numbers speak for themselves, Geebus. Her approval rating was higher than Trump's; she lost in a low turnout election. Too many voters liked her better than Trump but not enough to get off their asses and go to the polls.

Yet all through the day and into the evening the networks all kept claiming that turnout in blue cities was MASSIVE . Go look yourself,.....you will find example after example of mediot talking heads all CLAIMING this. Or would that just be another example of election interference by mediots trying to suppress the Republican vote by making people feel like they have no shot?

 

[Damocles]

Numbers speak for themselves, Geebus. Her approval rating was higher than Trump's; she lost in a low turnout election. Too many voters liked her better than Trump but not enough to get off their asses and go to the polls.

You are literally delusional, a "True Believer"... You can sit quietly in the corner angrily whispering how she was "more popular" but still lost to that "Angry Orange Man"... Just don't get any of that stuff on me.

 

[Stone]

Election day..........

LW reporters.........." What a massive turnout in these blue cities and campuses today,....officials here on the ground today are saying they are not sure they have ever seen voter turn outs like this before!"

Day after election....

Same LW reporters....... " yeah,...Harris lost a very low turnout election, in the end the turn out just wasn't there "

These scumbags literally have no shame.

Is it any wonder that the political class media is very aptly referred to as FAKE NEWS? That's because that is exactly what it is!

 

[martin]

You are literally delusional, a "True Believer"... You can sit quietly in the corner angrily whispering how she was "more popular" but still lost to that "Angry Orange Man"... Just don't get any of that stuff on me.

I cited facts. You're evidently unable to process or accept them. Her approval ratings were higher than Trump's. She tied or exceeded him in many of the polls though slightly trailed in others. The election turnout was considerably lower than in the previous election particularly among Democrats and Independents.

 

[martin]

Yet all through the day and into the evening the networks all kept claiming that turnout in blue cities was MASSIVE . Go look yourself,.....you will find example after example of mediot talking heads all CLAIMING this. Or would that just be another example of election interference by mediots trying to suppress the Republican vote by making people feel like they have no shot?

The vote totals are what matter obviously, not what the networks "kept claiming". Check them yourself.

 

[Damocles]

The vote totals are what matter obviously, not what the networks "kept claiming". Check them yourself.

The vote totals are the only poll that matters, obviously, and Trump beat your candidate because she didn't have the popularity you claim. But by all means... Please have her run against the republican candidate in 4 years. She can "joy in the morning" her way into obscurity again. I think you should pick candidates that never get more than 1% in a primary over and over again.

You can even sit in the corner after they lose again and tell everyone that passes by how popular your candidate was like you are Willy Loman's wife in Death of a Salesman, shocked at the low turnout at the funeral...

 

[Earl]

So you are saying that trump cannot even get a majority of the popular vote when running against wildly unpopular candidates? You think he is that bad?

Did Kamala win the majority of the vote?

Did Kamala win anything?

President-elect Trump, President-elect Trump, President-elect Trump!

 

[Earl]

Numbers speak for themselves, Geebus. Her approval rating was higher than Trump's; she lost in a low turnout election. Too many voters liked her better than Trump but not enough to get off their asses and go to the polls.

Marty, Marty, Marty.

You need a vacation. Go to Europe for a few months. Enjoy some fine art, some good wine.

Then come back and face the fact that your candidate L O S T, Marty.

 

[Lionfish]

I cited facts. You're evidently unable to process or accept them. Her approval ratings were higher than Trump's. She tied or exceeded him in many of the polls though slightly trailed in others. The election turnout was considerably lower than in the previous election particularly among Democrats and Independents.

Bullcrap. It is coming out now that her canpaign knew she was well behind. You believing the media is your problem.

 

[martin]

The vote totals are the only poll that matters, obviously, and Trump beat your candidate because she didn't have the popularity you claim. But by all means... Please have her run against the republican candidate in 4 years. She can "joy in the morning" her way into obscurity again. I think you should pick candidates that never get more than 1% in a primary over and over again.

You can even sit in the corner after they lose again and tell everyone that passes by how popular your candidate was like you are Willy Loman's wife in Death of a Salesman, shocked at the low turnout at the funeral...

Nice Willy Loman analogy. What AI site provided it?

 

[Earl]

Well, it is what it is.

In eighteen (18) days, the Republicans will control the presidency, the House and the Senate...and the Justice Dept., the FBI, and the CIA.

All Secretaries...Defense, Transportation, State, etc. will be Republicans.

How do you like those apples?