I told you sycophants the constitution was clear!

What will Jarod's thread be if they decide in a way different than he is predicting? He's already told us what they "will do"...
Then I will Admit I was wrong about my prediction.
It would not be the first time, but im not wrong.

I will continue to believe what I believe, unless they write an opinion I find persuasive.
 
Where does the constitution say anything about the parents citizenship?
Have you read the Ark or the Elk decision? Both of them talk about the nationality of their parents. Are you aware the Justice Horace Gray was on both cases and was part of the majority opinion on both cases. In both Ark and Elk the allegiance of the parent is pivotal to the case.
 
You are full of shit. When Indians killed other Indians we let them work it out. When Indians killed an American the federal government prosecuted them.

The Major Crimes Act of 1885 or (18 U.S.C. § 1153), enacted as section 9 of the Indian Appropriations Act, 1886, Major_Crimes_Act Original Statute-is a law passed by the United States Congress. The law places certain crimes under federal jurisdiction if they are committed by a Native American in Native territory. The law follows the 1817 General Crimes Act,a which extended federal jurisdiction to crimes committed in Native territory but did not cover crimes committed by Native Americans against Native Americans.

 
Have you read the Ark or the Elk decision? Both of them talk about the nationality of their parents. Are you aware the Justice Horace Gray was on both cases and was part of the majority opinion on both cases. In both Ark and Elk the allegiance of the parent is pivotal to the case.
where does the Constitution say the citizenship of the parents is relevant?
 
Back
Top