]2epo]v[an
Banned
Whatever, so we can agree we don't need to make it a theist argument, yes?
If the government forces you to give birth to a child,
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
Whatever, so we can agree we don't need to make it a theist argument, yes?
Wrong; no one is calling it a theist argument but you. Do you know what STRAWMAN argument/Claim means?
straw man
noun
1: a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
]2epo]v[an
Banned
You're dead wrong. I gave you the exact wording of the First Amendment. Did you see "separation" anywhere in it? Of course, you didn't. Because none ever existed.
This is a fabricated, moronic leftist narrative.
You find anything credible from Madison that supports your laughable stupid claim and we'll debate it.
I don't need to, it's already standing law.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Wrong; no one is calling it a theist argument but you. Do you know what STRAWMAN argument/Claim means?
straw man
noun
1: a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
So we can't agree and it must be made a theist argument?
]2epo]v[an
Banned
There is no "separation" law dimwit.
There is. K thx
No one is calling it a theist argument but you. Do you know what a STRAWMAN argument/Claim means?
straw man
noun
1: a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted
]2epo]v[an
Banned
If you can't process intent you can't claim to be lawful.
]2epo]v[an
Banned
Only because you say so.
Good enough for me.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You're dead wrong. I gave you the exact wording of the First Amendment. Did you see "separation" anywhere in it? Of course, you didn't. Because none ever existed.
This is a fabricated, moronic leftist narrative.
You find anything credible from Madison that supports your laughable stupid claim and we'll debate it.
It prevents an establishment of the state religion.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
only if cars are dying at the hands of mindless lib'ruls.....
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Hence the separation of state and religion, dumbass.
That is a moronic statement from a moron. There is no "separation" clause. "Separation" does not equal establishment dumb fuck.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
That is a moronic statement from a moron. There is no "separation" clause. "Separation" does not equal establishment dumb fuck.
The word does not have to be in the First Amendment, moron. It's the implication. Any well educated person would understand it. Thomas Jefferson wrote about it.
“I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State,” Jefferson said.
The Constitution does not contain any "implications" you insufferably stupid uneducated dumb fuck.
Any well educated person knows what establishment means dumb fuck. You are not educated and look mentally retarded.
It didn't end up in the Constitution dumb fuck. That letter Thomas Jefferson wrote was to a committee of the Danbury Baptist association on January 1, 1802.
The Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
I'm not the one making shit up. You lied by omission by leaving out an important detail in my statement.[/QUOTE]
none of those examples you give refute what I said, that a democratic legislator suggest health care BE DENIED to anyone not vaccinated or who eat too much or smoke. they have introduced legislation to allow insurance companies to make them pay more, the way it used to be before obamacare.
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
way ahead of you, bitch. i do not hate blacks and minorites, or muslims, or gays, or independent women, and do not support lying ass traitors like trump...like you, asshole, who doesn't follow christian teaching anyway.