If The PP has his way, Marco will be ineligible.

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Marco Rubio's parents were not citizens of the United States when he was born.. . .

So based on what the PP administration asked the Court to do regarding birthright citizenship, Marco would not be an American, thus not elegable to run for President!!!

Do you agree Marco is not an American Citizen?
 
Jarod said:
Marco Rubio's parents were not citizens of the United States when he was born.. . .

So based on what the PP administration asked the Court to do regarding birthright citizenship, Marco would not be an American, thus not elegable to run for President!!!

Do you agree Marco is not an American Citizen?
Click to expand...
But he is an American citizen you dimwitted piece of dog shit

And if you had a brain you could think
 
correct, this would fix it for future Marco's

the loophole to cheat and win citizenship needs closed

factually though, his parents fixed the public record while he was still a kid. When they naturalized in 1975, it would of included him as well. The only reason it didn't is he was already a "birthright citizen"
 
Last edited:

MAGA will still defend this 😂​


maga-will-still-defend-this-v0-qqm3t9wz5lsg1.jpeg
 
Someone was not paying attention to the discussions taking place in the SC this morning...
 
The issue is did the parents come here legally with the intent to reside here permanently and become citizens... Justice Alito brings in a key point ..."you can't establish a legal permanent domicile somewhere you are illegally present and subject to removal at anytime"...
 
Jarod said:
Marco Rubio's parents were not citizens of the United States when he was born.. . .

So based on what the PP administration asked the Court to do regarding birthright citizenship, Marco would not be an American, thus not elegable to run for President!!!

Do you agree Marco is not an American Citizen?
Click to expand...
This is entirely incorrect, as usual from Jarod. Based on what the Powerful Potentate (PP) says he would still be a citizen if they were legal residents (which they were)...

Trump's "PP administration" policy on birthright citizenship:​


The Trump administration's 2025 executive order on birthright citizenship attempted to narrow the interpretation. It directed agencies not to recognize automatic citizenship for certain U.S.-born children where:


  • The mother was unlawfully present (undocumented) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident, or
  • The mother's presence was lawful but temporary (e.g., tourist, student, or work visa) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident.

Crucially, the order explicitly stated that it would not affect "the entitlement of other individuals, including children of lawful permanent residents." In other words, children born in the U.S. to parents who held green cards (lawful permanent residents) would still qualify for citizenship under the policy the administration is pushing.
 
Yakuda said:
This is why I treat you like the shit stain you are francis. You don't have to talk very long to a leftist before they come unhinged.
Click to expand...
You seem to be the one "unhinged." I am sitting here smiling...actually, laughing at you.

You gotta learn to be more cool.

Chill, little guy.
 
Damocles said:
This is entirely incorrect, as usual from Jarod. Based on what the Powerful Potentate (PP) says he would still be a citizen if they were legal residents (which they were)...

Trump's "PP administration" policy on birthright citizenship:​


The Trump administration's 2025 executive order on birthright citizenship attempted to narrow the interpretation. It directed agencies not to recognize automatic citizenship for certain U.S.-born children where:


  • The mother was unlawfully present (undocumented) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident, or
  • The mother's presence was lawful but temporary (e.g., tourist, student, or work visa) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident.

Crucially, the order explicitly stated that it would not affect "the entitlement of other individuals, including children of lawful permanent residents." In other words, children born in the U.S. to parents who held green cards (lawful permanent residents) would still qualify for citizenship under the policy the administration is pushing.
Click to expand...
The unicorn lawyer isn't much of any kind of lawyer
 
Damocles said:
This is entirely incorrect, as usual from Jarod. Based on what the Powerful Potentate (PP) says he would still be a citizen if they were legal residents (which they were)...

Trump's "PP administration" policy on birthright citizenship:​


The Trump administration's 2025 executive order on birthright citizenship attempted to narrow the interpretation. It directed agencies not to recognize automatic citizenship for certain U.S.-born children where:


  • The mother was unlawfully present (undocumented) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident, or
  • The mother's presence was lawful but temporary (e.g., tourist, student, or work visa) and the father was neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident.

Crucially, the order explicitly stated that it would not affect "the entitlement of other individuals, including children of lawful permanent residents." In other words, children born in the U.S. to parents who held green cards (lawful permanent residents) would still qualify for citizenship under the policy the administration is pushing.
Click to expand...
Maybe under the administrative order, but not on how they would have the Constitution read.
 
TOP said:
The issue is did the parents come here legally with the intent to reside here permanently and become citizens... Justice Alito brings in a key point ..."you can't establish a legal permanent domicile somewhere you are illegally present and subject to removal at anytime"...
Click to expand...
The issue is, Does the Constitution grant citizenship to people born here. If it does, Trump's attempt to limit it is invalid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top