you're struggling with these lies.
lol says the ignorant guy trying to make up his own history.
you're struggling with these lies.
its very possible western Christians created a sect to control the east and fight original Christians from the holy land, who weren't puffed up with imperial bullshit.
it doesn't matter WHERE.lol no, Antioch became the major center of Christianity after the Jews began banning Christians form their synagogues. The first Church was in the Upper Room of the Temple in Jerusalem. The first Bishop was James.
the church in Rome was around WAY before the 7th cenury.lol says the ignorant guy trying to make up his own history.
there was a Christian power structure before the 7th century.lol says the ignorant guy trying to make up his own history.
I mentioned it but it actually doesnt matter WHERE.Cuz I said they didn't?
lol of course it does. You said so yourself.
no.Christianity is a dead religion. Purely a fascist ideology.
No idea what you wrote. Please use proper grammar.no.
the violence is an imperial add on.
disregard catholicism and anything descended from it.
the church in Rome was around WAY before the 7th cenury.
disregard catholicism and anything descended from it.
lets call it a truce.Yes, I can mostly agree with that, much the same way 'Judaism' after Ezra's scams can be disregarded as well.
regardless, mohammed was a Christian plant.So what? There were Christians in Rome before Constantine was born. Doesn't make them the first or even the head church. In fact they didn't even 'outrank' several Greek churches, as shown by letters from Paul addressing various issues.
The Peanut Gallery can find Darrell Bock's excellent book The Missing Gospels for a good layman's intro to early Christian churches.
![]()
The Missing Gospels: Unearthing the Truth behind Alternative Christianities - DTS Voice
Was orthodoxy just one among many competing “Christianities” in the earliest church that just happened to win out against the others? Did it thenvoice.dts.edu
The book has an excellent discussion on whether or not Rome dominated the churches early on. It didn't.
regardless, mohammed was a Christian plant.
where the "church" was centered is not the point.
agreed, andThey much more resemble the Babylonian Jewish cult than anything near Christianity. Even 'the taqiyya' racket resembles the Orthodox rabbinical racism and practices.
agreed, and
....you are now fully in the club.
watch your neck.
It is quite humorous that those who are the most ignorant on the Bible are those who profess to be Bible thumping Christians. The scholars, people who actually STUDY the Bible for a living, are mostly atheists. And they became atheists only AFTER their deep study led them to that conclusion.
If the Bible stories that defy all laws of science and nature were written today, by an author we could actually talk to about his veracity, we would label it as science fiction.
But, since it was written by several unknown authors 2000 years ago, the believers take it as fact. Delusional. Willfully ignorant. Intellectually lazy.
Yep, unless there’s ANY credible evidence to the contrary, I’ll remain an atheist. So far, not one fucking shred that has been convincing.No problem for you, since you'll always be an anti Christian atheist like your buddy guno.