I'm confused!
- Thread starter Robo
- Start date
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Prove it.
In 1976, Congress passed the National Emergencies Act, which permits the president to pronounce a national emergency when he considers it appropriate. The act offers no specific definition of “emergency” and allows a president to declare one entirely at his or her discretion.
Robo
Verified User
The technologies you presented are what again and how do they work better than a wall?
Robo
Verified User
In 1976, Congress passed the National Emergencies Act, which permits the president to pronounce a national emergency when he considers it appropriate. The act offers no specific definition of “emergency” and allows a president to declare one entirely at his or her discretion.
Robo
Verified User
That addy doesn't work!!!
Robo
Verified User
You never replied to the OP, how come???
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
No you didn't.
In 1976, Congress passed the National Emergencies Act, which permits the president to pronounce a national emergency when he considers it appropriate. The act offers no specific definition of “emergency” and allows a president to declare one entirely at his or her discretion.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Robo,
Again, we disagree on the basic premise.
I did reply to the OP in post #24. You wanted help understanding Democrats. I said they are not the same. If you want to understand Democrats better, the first thing to know is that they are all different people. No two of them believe or say all the same things.
And you then replied to me.
Your OP was predicated upon the notion that all Democrats are the same. I pointed out the fallacy. You skipped right over my point, reiterated your belief that you believe all Democrats are the same. So I backed off, sensing a pointless loop.
Later, you said "... immigrants that come legally, and wait their turn."
I commented on that, which you responded to.
When I replied directly to your response, it led to you claiming I was going off topic.
I thought we were exploring our different views which apply to why we differ on the OP, but you disagreed.
I think the problem is the OP is based on some assumptions which I do not accept. You want a conversation which is precluded by acceptance of those assumptions; I do not feel bounded by them.
Again, we disagree on the basic premise.
I did reply to the OP in post #24. You wanted help understanding Democrats. I said they are not the same. If you want to understand Democrats better, the first thing to know is that they are all different people. No two of them believe or say all the same things.
And you then replied to me.
Your OP was predicated upon the notion that all Democrats are the same. I pointed out the fallacy. You skipped right over my point, reiterated your belief that you believe all Democrats are the same. So I backed off, sensing a pointless loop.
Later, you said "... immigrants that come legally, and wait their turn."
I commented on that, which you responded to.
When I replied directly to your response, it led to you claiming I was going off topic.
I thought we were exploring our different views which apply to why we differ on the OP, but you disagreed.
I think the problem is the OP is based on some assumptions which I do not accept. You want a conversation which is precluded by acceptance of those assumptions; I do not feel bounded by them.
Robo
Verified User
OFF TOPIC Again, you're wasting keyboard !!!
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Robo,
Again, I was only responding to you. You asked a question. I answered your question.
Your question was:
"You never replied to the OP, how come???"
Just as the OP, the question included an untrue statement, which I addressed.
The problem is that you keep posting all these things which simply are not so.
My keyboard is just fine. I am cool, calm and collected. It's just a conversation. But you know? The thing about a conversation is you have to let other people say what they want to say. You can't control what somebody else says. All you can do is control what YOU say. And so far, you haven't said much that rings very true. You should be thanking me for patiently and respectfully straightening you out.
Again, I was only responding to you. You asked a question. I answered your question.
Your question was:
"You never replied to the OP, how come???"
Just as the OP, the question included an untrue statement, which I addressed.
The problem is that you keep posting all these things which simply are not so.
My keyboard is just fine. I am cool, calm and collected. It's just a conversation. But you know? The thing about a conversation is you have to let other people say what they want to say. You can't control what somebody else says. All you can do is control what YOU say. And so far, you haven't said much that rings very true. You should be thanking me for patiently and respectfully straightening you out.