Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
A Gorillas cortex and brain is not as developed as a humans. They cannot reason the way we do. They are not AS aware as us. AT ALL. If you taught a monkey to pray that's not going to change shit dixie. It's so lol and spurious for you to claim the only thing that separates us is spirituality. This is just more retardspeak.
I hate to tell you this, but you just made my point. Initially, you claimed that humans are not still swinging from trees in the jungle because we have a large cerebral cortex, self-awareness, and empathy. Gorillas actually have a larger cerebral cortex than humans, are very self-aware, and have often exhibited empathy. Chimps share 96% of our DNA. So these things are also present in lower primates, and your reasoning for why man is no longer in the jungle, simply fails. We must look for something unique to man, something that man has that other primates do not have... what could that possibly be? Hmmmm? Maybe it is spirituality? Nahh, that couldn't have a thing to do with why man is more aware, more developed, and can better reason.
Concerning spirituality and civilizations:
when rome fell, the citizens still believed in jupiter and were still spiritual people. Later emperors even embraced christianity. In fact, nearly one hundred years after constantine embraced christianity, the western empire fell. Coincidence???
Actually, when Rome fell, it was in devastating moral decline, and had been for many years. Many scholars believe the decay of morality in Rome, the corruption and decadence, was precisely what caused the empire to crumble. Bad example for you to use, again, because it supports MY point, not yours.
In fact, we could say that many, if not all civilizations that have fallen, were spiritual. The greeks still believed in their pantheon, and they fell, the assyrians fell while being spiritual, the persians fell. The ottoman empire fell.
Well, that is because most civilizations can't even be formed without some spiritual basis and foundation. The fact that most (if not all) were spiritual, should be clear enough evidence to even a closed-minded fool like you, but you just refuse to accept facts. If I had stated that all civilizations based on spiritual foundations were successful, you would have a point here, but that isn't what I stated, is it? No... I asked you to give me an example of a long-standing civilization which had no spirituality, and you can't.
Seems these so called spiritual nations don't have much of a track record.
You still have provided zero evidence that spirituality is connected any way to the rise or fall of any civilization. zero.
You just proved it! You admit that most all civilizations have some spirituality, you can't give even ONE example of a long-standing civilization without spirituality. You haven't defined what could have brought man out of the jungles, everything you cited is also present in lower primates. The only unique and distinct difference in terms of behavioral attributes, is human spirituality.
Now you can refuse to accept the facts, and continue to insist I haven't presented evidence, and you can try to twist the argument around to the opposite of what I've said, but you are just plain wrong and have proven yourself wrong in your very own words. I rest my case!