Immigrants in the news
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
It doesn't change that it never was really an option.
Cool facts that Americans now know.
We have no way of knowing if the death penalty would have been on the table if the family had preferred it.
Since they didn’t, we will never know.
Perhaps some of the real bad boys in prison will teach him a lesson about rape.
I think we all know. I also believe that the DA worked to convince them to go that route because that was the route he wanted to take. Personally I do not like the death penalty because there is no possible way to ensure no innocents are put to death and it creates an unfixable situation if you find out they were innocent after the sentence has been carried out... so it isn't like I'm personally upset, I just recognize the positions of the DAs and AGs that Soros buys with his money.
I don't disagree. I just hope he gets some Jeffrey Dahmer treatment.
The video of Laken Riley's mother's reaction to the notice of her daughter's death should haunt Biden and Harris and those who support open borders for the rest of their lives.
The D/A is a she... Deborah Gonzalez...make of it what you will. She is not a proponent of the death penalty.
There are still Democrats who are fighting the deportation of convicted violent criminals. Just wait for their reaction when the deportation of non-violent illegals begins.
It's a settled issue...there will be mass deportations. The American people support it. The Democratic plan to import millions of illegal immigrant voters for their votes has failed.
Last edited:
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
They do not support open borders.
You are the worst kind of fool.
How Democrats will try to block Trump's promise of mass ...
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2024/11/23 › democ...
1 day ago — Democratic attorneys general are preparing a raft of legal actions to prevent Donald Trump from carrying out mass deportations of ...
Missing:
Democratic governor pledges deportation rebellion
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/23/democrat-attorneys-general-trump-mass-deportations-00191332
Nov 8, 2024 — Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey said she would "absolutely not" allow state police to aid with deportations if the Trump administration...
Attachments
Last edited:
Diogenes
Oops! You ran into some problems.
The town of Herndon, VA was shaken this week when a woman was r*ped on a popular trail by an illegal with a history of sex crimes
The police chief said it’s the only stranger rape in the town in her more than 12 years on the job and added “what is disturbing is the number of times this individual has been arrested and released”
Why was he out on the streets?!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I normally delete memes in my responses, but I'll keep this one for reference.
I am very much in favor of immediately deporting all violent criminal illegals. I am in favor of deporting illegals who are negatively impacting job markets for Americans (but not where they are filling needed labor deficiencies).
Ergo, I am not strongly in support of deporting every single illegal immigrant. Nonetheless, I do support mass deportations.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Diogenes
Oops! You ran into some problems.
Good man.
Here are some points to keep in mind over the next few months as you encounter and overcome weak arguments from leftists.
First, the new administration will seek to deport quickly those illegal immigrants who are deemed national security threats.
At the same time, it will pursue illegal immigrants with criminal records.
It will assign priority to the illegals whose cases have already been adjudicated and were previously ordered to de deported.
Last year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reported that as of Sept. 30, 2023, there were 1,292,830 people in the U.S. illegally who have already had full legal due process and have already received a final deportation order from an immigration judge.
Ironically, the Trump administration will rely on a document known as the Mayorkas Memorandum to deport other illegals.
On Sept. 30, 2021, Joe Biden's Department of Homeland Security head Alejandro Mayorkas sent that administration’s top immigration officials a set of guidelines for enforcing immigration law.
In the memo, Mayorkas laid out the Biden Administration's rules for deporting illegal immigrants.
“We will prioritize for apprehension and removal noncitizens who are a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security,” Mayorkas wrote.
The first group is terrorists and spies.
The second is known criminals.
Then there is the third group, the "threats to border security", as defined by the Biden Administration.
“A noncitizen who poses a threat to border security is a priority for apprehension and removal,” Mayorkas wrote.
“A noncitizen is a threat to border security if (a) they are apprehended at the border or port of entry while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States; or (b) they are apprehended in the United States after unlawfully entering after November 1, 2020.”
Therefore, when the Trump Administration applies the Nov. 1, 2020, Biden rules - the Mayorkas standard - by deporting those who had most recently crossed illegally into the U.S., Democrats will have no basis for complaint whatsoever.
At the same time, it will pursue illegal immigrants with criminal records.
It will assign priority to the illegals whose cases have already been adjudicated and were previously ordered to de deported.
Last year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reported that as of Sept. 30, 2023, there were 1,292,830 people in the U.S. illegally who have already had full legal due process and have already received a final deportation order from an immigration judge.
Ironically, the Trump administration will rely on a document known as the Mayorkas Memorandum to deport other illegals.
On Sept. 30, 2021, Joe Biden's Department of Homeland Security head Alejandro Mayorkas sent that administration’s top immigration officials a set of guidelines for enforcing immigration law.
In the memo, Mayorkas laid out the Biden Administration's rules for deporting illegal immigrants.
“We will prioritize for apprehension and removal noncitizens who are a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security,” Mayorkas wrote.
The first group is terrorists and spies.
The second is known criminals.
Then there is the third group, the "threats to border security", as defined by the Biden Administration.
“A noncitizen who poses a threat to border security is a priority for apprehension and removal,” Mayorkas wrote.
“A noncitizen is a threat to border security if (a) they are apprehended at the border or port of entry while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States; or (b) they are apprehended in the United States after unlawfully entering after November 1, 2020.”
Therefore, when the Trump Administration applies the Nov. 1, 2020, Biden rules - the Mayorkas standard - by deporting those who had most recently crossed illegally into the U.S., Democrats will have no basis for complaint whatsoever.
How does that sound, sir?
Diogenes
Oops! You ran into some problems.
The reason America appears overrun with "refugees" is because of a loophole exploited by clever Democrats.
During Obama's dark Reign of Error, many illegals were coached by operatives employed by leftist NGOs (non-governmental organizations) to discard their ID from their country of origin and say "asylum", "refugee" and "credible fear" to immigration officers and Border Patrol agents.
That's why the southern border is strewn with discarded documents.
Obama and his hapless third-term figurehead Biden chose not to detain them during the adjudication process.
They simply released them (usually on their own recognizance) and told them to come back when summoned for a court date in the future.
In many cases they gave the illegals "free" rides (by bus or air) to destinations all over the USA and provided them with "free" phones and preloaded debit cards.
The "freebies" were, of course, provided by the US government.
Unbelievably, "refugees" were allowed to skip security screening at airports while American had to submit to ID checks, scans, and searches.
Remember, these individuals had no verified ID, having discarded theirs at the border. The scanty "travel authorizations they were issued contained only what the "refugees" had told Immigration. Nobody checked. How could they?
Then, so-called "sanctuary" states and cities (and countless hapless small towns) were inundated with hordes of"refugees" and were - in many cases - expected to give them "free" lodging, "free" medical care, and "free" access to hospitals and public schools.
You can guess how many returned for their court dates.
During Obama's dark Reign of Error, many illegals were coached by operatives employed by leftist NGOs (non-governmental organizations) to discard their ID from their country of origin and say "asylum", "refugee" and "credible fear" to immigration officers and Border Patrol agents.
That's why the southern border is strewn with discarded documents.
Obama and his hapless third-term figurehead Biden chose not to detain them during the adjudication process.
They simply released them (usually on their own recognizance) and told them to come back when summoned for a court date in the future.
In many cases they gave the illegals "free" rides (by bus or air) to destinations all over the USA and provided them with "free" phones and preloaded debit cards.
The "freebies" were, of course, provided by the US government.
Unbelievably, "refugees" were allowed to skip security screening at airports while American had to submit to ID checks, scans, and searches.
Remember, these individuals had no verified ID, having discarded theirs at the border. The scanty "travel authorizations they were issued contained only what the "refugees" had told Immigration. Nobody checked. How could they?
Then, so-called "sanctuary" states and cities (and countless hapless small towns) were inundated with hordes of"refugees" and were - in many cases - expected to give them "free" lodging, "free" medical care, and "free" access to hospitals and public schools.
You can guess how many returned for their court dates.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Are you saying that his analysis is cool because he recognizes that humans conspire whereas you really don't recognize such?
I've been to NYC (Manhattan) many times delivering for restaurants. Many take their deliveries in the basements and you have to avoid the rat traps.
Miserable, but usually just once a week. The others deliveries were in DC, Maryland and Virginia. I did that for 2 years until I found a good Machinist's job. Yeah, you can keep your cities, I prefer the rural areas.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I'm all in favor of the rule of law, hence a republican form of government, as opposed to a democracy and mob rule. If we are following a law as detailed and specific as you elucidated, I'm fully on board. What I appreciate is the prioritization. I don't want to see unjust, two-tiered witch hunts whereby illegals who do not pose any national security threat are persecuted, or harassed, while DEI enforcement sees murderers, rapists, child traffickers, and fentanyl pushers are ignored, or set free, or not required to pay bail, etc...
I also don't want to hear about "families being separated" because all criminals are separated from their families upon arrest and incarceration. To not do so would require families to also be incarcerated for the crimes of one family member, or for laws to not be enforced due to a criminal having a family.
Diogenes
Oops! You ran into some problems.
Then, these may be useful tools to bookmark for later use:
Remember when Obama's thugs raped underage illegals and JPP leftists were silent?
As a detained 16-year-old immigrant waited in her cell with her infant child, a Border Patrol stood in the doorway and warned her, “Right now, we close the door, we rape you and fuck you.”
On a separate occasion, an agent tossed an immigrant child to the ground, leveled a gun at him, and told the kid, “Stop or I will shoot you.” A group of officers once told several pregnant girls that they’d "come to contaminate this country with all those things. Look at all those other girls, all fat.”
These incidents, and dozens of similar allegations of child abuse by Border Patrol agents, are all detailed in a report released by the American Civil Liberties Union’s Border Litigation Project and the International Human Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago School of Law.
All of the incidents, which are drawn from complaints filed with a Department of Homeland Security watchdog agency and obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, took place between 2009 and 2014, under the Obama administration.
“The records show that the leadership at Customs and Border Protection were well aware of the allegations of unlawful child abuse — including people still now directing the agency — yet there is no indication that any individual official was ever held accountable for abuse,” Mitra Ebadolahi, a staff attorney with the Border Litigation project and the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, wrote.
One Border Patrol agent ran over a teenager with a patrol car, then punched the teen in the head and body multiple times.
These incidents, Ebadolahi wrote, are “part of a pattern of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse by Customs and Border Protection officials against child immigrants.
- Another called a child a “she-male,” adding, “These people just come here to get a sex change operation.”
- Even though a doctor told a minor who’d recently given birth to keep her premature, four-pound baby away from other people, agents placed the minor inside a “dirty hold room” for two days. The room, the complaint says, “was full of garbage and sick people.”
- Multiple minors said that Border Patrol agents refused to give them milk for their infants. One said her child became sick after agents gave her spoiled milk; agents then refused to give her medicine for two days.
- A 15-year-old also said an agent touched her thigh, just days after she saw the same agent put his hand between the legs of another female detainee.
Border Patrol beat, sexually assaulted, and denied medical care to immigrant children, ACLU says — CORRECTED IMAGE
As a detained 16-year-old immigrant waited in her cell with her infant child, a Border Patrol stood in the doorway and warned her, “Right now, we close the door, we rape you and fuck you.”news.vice.com
Remember when Obama detained & deported asylum seekers?
Did JPP leftists protest?
UNDER OBAMA, ASYLEES WERE CAGED FOR YEARS AND DEPORTED TO ALMOST CERTAIN DEATH
The Obama administration deported 85 Muslim asylum seekers from Bangladesh, India and Nepal who were seeking asylum after fleeing repression and violence in their home countries.
Some of the men deported from Corrections Corporations of America’s Florence Correctional Center in Arizona had participated in a series of hunger strikes last year to protest their ongoing detention by ICE, the Immigration Customs and Enforcement agency, and demanded their release from for-profit detention centers.
Some of the men had been detained for years.
After the deportation, Fahd Ahmed, executive director of a New York-based organization of South Asian immigrant workers and youth said, "The Obama administration deported nearly 100 South Asian detainees who crossed three continents seeking safety in the U.S. What happens to them is blood on his hands."
Why Did Obama Deport 85 Muslim Asylum Seekers?
Why Did Obama Deport 85 Muslim Asylum Seekers?
This week, the Obama administration deported 85 Muslim asylum seekers from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.
www.kcet.org
Feel free to utilize them when the lefty hypocrites start that faux outrage they love to put on like a party hat.
