In Light of the Rittenhouse Verdict... A Question

[BidenPresident]

Breaking and entering is a crime no matter what property it's being committed on. If the rioters had acted like decent individuals instead of lawless vandals screaming "hang Mike Pence," there wouldn't have been a problem.

The insurrection was planned. Proud Boys and others planned on violence.

 

[]2epo]v[an]

The probable crime in question, seditiously making the United States citizenry guilty of heinous warcrimes by fraudulently installing a dead to rights guilty war criminal. Check sig for details.

Failure to enforce either our own laws, Afghanistan laws, or even international law during an occupation is at the hight of all warcrimes. War crimes with a world wide deathtol btw.

 

[]2epo]v[an]

Breaking and entering is a crime no matter what property it's being committed on. If the rioters had acted like decent individuals instead of lawless vandals screaming "hang Mike Pence," there wouldn't have been a problem.

A crime transferable to the occupants engaged in heinous crimes. You're trying to say you cannot cross the street to stop a mugging if the "do not walk" sign is lit.

Lawful evil has no place with me.

 

[Legion]

In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?

Try it and see.

 

[volsrock]

Breaking and entering is a crime no matter what property it's being committed on.

She may have been let in!!!

Videos from the day of the attack appear to show some officers escorting rioters inside the building. In one video, USCP officers can be seen opening barricades allowing the mob to enter the Capitol complex without resistance.


https://www.npr.org/sections/insurr...-investigates-dozens-more-after-capitol-riots

 

[]2epo]v[an]

Look how all these slime faggots are habitually looking to confuse the exception for the rule. Prolly fbi.

 

[christiefan915]

A crime transferable to the occupants engaged in heinous crimes. You're trying to say you cannot cross the street to stop a mugging if the "do not walk" sign is lit.

Lawful evil has no place with me.

No crime was being committed when the riot started. "Lawful" means just that; there's no an alternate definition no matter how much people try to use one to justify their criminal behaviour.

Mugging is criminal. Counting and recording certified votes is not, and it was not up to the rioters to make any decisions about that.

In the future, try not to use such loose definitions re: criminal and non-criminal actions.

 

[Stone]

you're on ignore. enough out of you

You cant go around committing 12 B violations. It is actually a form of domestic terrorism when you impugn someones character in such a way. Hopefully you will think things through during your upcoming ban.

 

[The Anonymous]

In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?

That's right!!!

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The insurrection was planned. Proud Boys and others planned on violence.

What "insurrection" would that be? Who has been charged with "insurrection" and against whom as part of that?

 

[BidenPresident]

What "insurrection" would that be? Who has been charged with "insurrection" and against whom as part of that?

Who brushes your teeth at night?

 

[evince]

So it’s always been the way you describe in the OP. The burden of proof is on the survivor. Maybe?

I’m pretty sure if you go into a bar and “pick a fight” there will be witnesses naming you as the aggressor.

There were witnesses


They said he was pointing his weapon at people

 

[evince]

What "insurrection" would that be? Who has been charged with "insurrection" and against whom as part of that?

That is meaningless

 

[The Anonymous]

There were witnesses


They said he was pointing his weapon at people

That's right!!!

 

[evince]

So now a guy can go to a bar


Grab a woman's ass until she slaps him


And he can shoot her in the head and get off


He just has to say he feared for his life

 

[Grokmaster]

In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?

Not if one is already committing crime(s)....

 

[Nordberg]

How did Rittenhouse pick a fight!?

Are you saying going to where there are demonstrations with an AR 15, is an act of non-violence. He went there looking for trouble. People doing that usually find it.

 

[Sailor]

Are you saying going to where there are demonstrations with an AR 15, is an act of non-violence. He went there looking for trouble. People doing that usually find it.[/QUOTE]

As democrats are finding out.

 

[ExpressLane]

In the event of a shoot out between two armed people...both can now claim self defense right?

Who started the fight?

 

[ExpressLane]

Are you saying going to where there are demonstrations with an AR 15, is an act of non-violence. He went there looking for trouble. People doing that usually find it.

Is that so?