In pictures: The nationwide ‘No Kings’ protests

Deep fake.
Gone are the days when you can just say that and even leftists will believe you.

Based on the visual analysis of the image, there are no clear signs that it was produced by AI. The details... such as the texture of the clothing, the natural poses of the people, the realistic lighting, and the complexity of the background with buildings and signs... appear consistent with a genuine photograph. AI-generated images often have subtle artifacts like unnatural blending of edges, inconsistent shadows, or distorted facial features, but none of these are evident here. It looks like a real scene captured during a public event.
 
Gone are the days when you can just say that and leftist people will believe you.

Based on the visual analysis of the image, there are no clear signs that it was produced by AI. The details... such as the texture of the clothing, the natural poses of the people, the realistic lighting, and the complexity of the background with buildings and signs... appear consistent with a genuine photograph. AI-generated images often have subtle artifacts like unnatural blending of edges, inconsistent shadows, or distorted facial features, but none of these are evident here. It looks like a real scene captured during a public event.
I'm looking at hands, facial features, head and body positions, clothing and sizes, in addition to what you mentioned. Unfortunately there's no link to either of the two pics I commented on. That would help but I'm not surprised it's missing.
 
Anyway, it wasn't even difficult to find the images... and no, there are no signs they are faked at all. The left loves to claim things are fake when they don't want to face the reality.
 
Okay. The video shows that there are plenty of younger people there, even though Lionfish is trying to pretend that only old people attend these protests.
Yet, you wanted to pretend the images are fake for a reason. You were doing it because you don't want to believe what you saw with your own eyes. You are literally trying to gaslight yourself.
 
However, you can see the image in the hotlink and know I am giving you a link.

You must work hard to remain ignorant if you aren't going to face these simple truths, these aren't even big truths....
I really don't know what you're getting at, other than your usual default to snark. I clicked on the hotlink and this is what came up. I didn't need to see your tiny pic when I was looking for the article itself.

1750432418633.png
 
Yet, you wanted to pretend the images are fake for a reason. You were doing it because you don't want to believe what you saw with your own eyes. You are literally trying to gaslight yourself.
Thanks Miss Cleo, but fail. There have been far too many fake images posted by repugs, so now my default position is to check everything before giving the okay.

Someday, if we're lucky, you'll stop posting what you *think* liberals said, instead of what we really did say.
 
Thanks Miss Cleo, but fail. There have been far too many fake images posted by repugs, so now my default position is to check everything before giving the okay.

Someday, if we're lucky, you'll stop posting what you *think* liberals said, instead of what we really did say.
LOL.

In this case, you know it isn't fake, have links to the stories, but because it is "behind a paywall" that you don't want to pay for you pretend it is unreachable, even though you can see it on the hotlink.

Again, you are simply trying to gaslight yourself. This is like believing the "cheap fake" narrative about Biden. Nothing was "fake" but the narrative. You just are doing it to yourself. Even leftists don't believe the leftist "Nooz" when they say nonsense like that.

The images are not AI, they are real, and are in real stories.
 
The hotlink literally has the image in it.

Here is an image of the hotlink for you, since you "cannot see" what I am talking about.

View attachment 52759
How many time did I say that I wanted to read the article and not just look at a picture? You're being willfully blind if you haven't seen it.

Btw I right-clicked on the original pics and no source came up, just this, which is meaningless. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/attachments/gtdktepbkaismcb-jpg.52747/
 
How many time did I say that I wanted to read the article and not just look at a picture? You're being willfully blind if you haven't seen it.

Btw I right-clicked on the original pics and no source came up, just this, which is meaningless. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/attachments/gtdktepbkaismcb-jpg.52747/
You can simply copy an image and paste it into a post, it gives that kind of thing.

I gave you the link, you pretend you "can't see it" even though it is right there before your eyes, and want to pretend it is "fake" because it is a news source that has a paywall.

You're like a little kid covering his eyes and shouting "la la la!"...

I get that you don't like what you are seeing, but gaslighting yourself is a choice.
 
I don’t know why age has anything to do with it, there were still 5-11 million people who were protesting. The largest protest in our history.
There were tons of younger people at the protests and Damo's own video proves it. These magas are cropping and cherry-picking images to pretend that it was an old peoples' protest but they're just lying. I guess they'll do and say anything to distract from the total disaster of trump's birthday parade.
 
There were tons of younger people at the protests and Damo's own video proves it. These magas are cropping and cherry-picking images to pretend that it was an old peoples' protest but they're just lying. I guess they'll do and say anything to distract from the total disaster of trump's birthday parade.
Or anything else DonOld is doing.
 
Back
Top