Infringement
- Thread starter Evmetro
- Start date
Just the opposite, illiterate racist cunt.
Barrel strokers think that ANY law that restricts ANYTHING about guns is a violation of their Constitutional rights. A bunch of ignorant morons.
From the Heller decision. The majority opinion:
“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the opinione historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.”
Find a literate person to explain that to you.
So, which gun law are you citing that does not "limit or undermine" one's right to bear arms as I asked in the opening post?
The point is, illiterate racist cunt, you don’t have an unlimited right to carry any gun, any time, any where. You never did. Despite your ignorant “shall not be infringed” bullshit. And the courts have consistently upheld that fact.
Why is English so difficult for you? Homeschooled, too, huh?
Exactly, in fact, no Constitutional right is absolute, they all can, and are, limited, even Scalia stressed such in the Holder case
So, which gun law are you citing that does not "limit or undermine" one's right to bear arms as I asked in the opening post?
Look any up, dumbfuck. You barrel stroking faggots are always complaining about those 22,000 gun laws. Pick one, idiot.
I am not aware of any gun control laws that do not "limit or undermine" the right to bear arms, which is why I started this thread. So, which gun law are you citing that does not "limit or undermine" one's right to bear arms as I asked in the opening post? So far, you have not cited a single one.
It's a joke, anyone who wants to obtain a weapon can gain access to a weapon, you can even buy them on the regular web
https://www.armslist.com/inside
So, which gun control law are you citing that does not "limit or undermine" one's right to bear arms as I asked in the opening post?
None, cause anyone can easily get around any of them if they really wanted a gun
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
The government should not come between me and my gun dealer
You’re not? Then, try this, ignorant racist cunt.
Saw off a shotgun and walk around with it for awhile.
Carry your handgun into a courthouse.
Try getting a gun if you’re a felon.
Go buy a machine gun and let me know how that process goes.
What a fucking moron.
"None" is the answer I was looking for in the opening post, and you have now confirmed it. Every gun law limits or undermines one's right to bear arms, I'm glad to see you agree.
All of the situations that you have presented here violate gun laws, but that is not what I asked for. I asked which gun laws do not "limit or undermine" one's right to bear arms, right there in the opening post. I can see that you have no intention of citing any such laws, so our time here is up. Post whatever crap you like, but I won't respond to you anymore on this thread until I see you post a law as described in the opening post.
countryboy
Verified User
Wait, you think one can simply order a gun online and have it shipped directly to their doorstep? Surely, even you are not that stupid.
Your lack of English comprehension is astounding.
Can you “bear” a sawed off shotgun, stupid fuck?
Bullshit. You cannot get a gun through that, of any firearm sales site, without a background check. Those guns have to go through your local gun shop. They don't come in the mail to your house. Don't be stupid...