Interior Secretary's daughter is violent, radical Leftist Environmentalist

I am fine. You believe what has no proof for but a shit pile against. You have a problem. You can convince yourself of lies when needed. The 800 or so people charged and most are in jail present an argument against your Trumpiness.

99% for something related to rioting, many for misdemeanors like trespass, not insurrection or treason. If it were an insurrection, wouldn't the insurrectionists--in the hundreds or thousands--be charged with that?
 
99% for something related to rioting, many for misdemeanors like trespass, not insurrection or treason. If it were an insurrection, wouldn't the insurrectionists--in the hundreds or thousands--be charged with that?

Amazing you feel the need to opine on something you know nothing about.
 
Amazing you feel the need to opine on something you know nothing about.

Okay, how many people involved in the Jan 6 riot have been charged with either treason or insurrection? After all, if it was an "insurrection" as the Left suggests, wouldn't the "insurrectionists" get charged for insurrection?
 
Better than being apathetic, I suppose.

The Secretary's daughter is just another elitist, college indoctrinated, spoiled brat who has too much money, time, and no life. She's the product of Leftist / Liberal privilege. She is the sort that would berate some wage slave waitress or bank teller for something, screaming about "Do you know who I am? My mother is Secretary of the Interior!"
 
As is just about everybody with a fully functioning brain.

Joe Sixpack isn't an important headliner.
Joe Sixpack will never be a real star.
Joe Sixpack is an extra from central casting.

Fully functioning brain? Not with those tattoos is she...! You're looking at an overeducated idiot that would meltdown faced by real debate using facts. She wouldn't last two minutes at that.
 
Fully functioning brain? Not with those tattoos is she...! You're looking at an overeducated idiot that would meltdown faced by real debate using facts. She wouldn't last two minutes at that.

I don't like tats either, but then again again, despite my hard left economic views, I'm socially conservative.

Nevertheless, there is no such thing as being overeducated.

I have only a baccalaureat degree, and have often experienced situations where I could have used more.

Doctors in all fields are under-respected in this nation because so many among us believe that overeducated is a thing. It isn't. Never has been, Never will be.

Broadening the vistas of one's mind is merely using the available intelligence that one has rather than wasting it..
 
I don't like tats either, but then again again, despite my hard left economic views, I'm socially conservative.

Nevertheless, there is no such thing as being overeducated.

I have only a baccalaureat degree, and have often experienced situations where I could have used more.

Doctors in all fields are under-respected in this nation because so many among us believe that overeducated is a thing. It isn't. Never has been, Never will be.

Broadening the vistas of one's mind is merely using the available intelligence that one has rather than wasting it..

Overeducated usually occurs in the "soft" liberal arts. That is, someone gets say a doctorate in Sociology and doesn't know how to use a scientific calculator (seen that more than once! "Were's the percent key on this?" they ask showing me their calculator...) Or, somebody with a doctoral degree in education (Joke's wife Jill comes to mind) whose thesis is a total joke.
 
Overeducated usually occurs in the "soft" liberal arts. That is, someone gets say a doctorate in Sociology and doesn't know how to use a scientific calculator (seen that more than once! "Were's the percent key on this?" they ask showing me their calculator...) Or, somebody with a doctoral degree in education (Joke's wife Jill comes to mind) whose thesis is a total joke.


We profoundly disagree. It happens in all societies, I'm told.
 
We profoundly disagree. It happens in all societies, I'm told.

It does. But it seems to afflict the soft liberal arts more than any other part of higher education. In my junior year in college, I took astronomy as a filler course (you needed 12 hours to get full GI bill payment). The class was full of liberal arts majors who were dreading it as their horribly difficult mandatory science class. It was a memorable experience being the only engineering and business (computer programming was a business degree while industrial engineering was an engineering degree) student in the entire class of something like 100 people, mostly female btw.
 
It does. But it seems to afflict the soft liberal arts more than any other part of higher education. In my junior year in college, I took astronomy as a filler course (you needed 12 hours to get full GI bill payment). The class was full of liberal arts majors who were dreading it as their horribly difficult mandatory science class. It was a memorable experience being the only engineering and business (computer programming was a business degree while industrial engineering was an engineering degree) student in the entire class of something like 100 people, mostly female btw.

Lots of us took astronomy in college, TAG.

Only our parents called it 'taking up space."

It was a different era, and staying out of Southeast Asia was one huge reason for being in school.

Needless to say, I got sent anyway after graduation. But at least I eventually got back home.
 
Lots of us took astronomy in college, TAG.

Only our parents called it 'taking up space."

It was a different era, and staying out of Southeast Asia was one huge reason for being in school.

Needless to say, I got sent anyway after graduation. But at least I eventually got back home.

I took it after physics with calculus, organic and inorganic chemistry, and sampling geology (personal interest). So, I saw it as an easy A and something interesting.
 
Back
Top