Interior Secretary's daughter is violent, radical Leftist Environmentalist

Four Oath Keepers guilty of seditious conspiracy in U.S. Capitol attack

WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - Four more members of the far-right Oath Keepers were found guilty on Monday of seditious conspiracy for taking part in the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of Donald Trump, in another big win for federal prosecutors.

The verdict marks the end of the second major sedition trial against members of the extremist group, who were among the hundreds who attacked the Capitol in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden's victory over Trump, a Republican, in the 2020 presidential election.

The 12-member jury found Oath Keeper members David Moerschel, Joseph Hackett, Roberto Minuta and Edward Vallejo guilty of seditious conspiracy.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/jury-...h-keepers-facing-sedition-charges-2023-01-23/
 
BidenPresident said:
WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - Four more members of the far-right Oath Keepers were found guilty on Monday of seditious conspiracy for taking part in the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of Donald Trump, in another big win for federal prosecutors.

The verdict marks the end of the second major sedition trial against members of the extremist group, who were among the hundreds who attacked the Capitol in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden's victory over Trump, a Republican, in the 2020 presidential election.

The 12-member jury found Oath Keeper members David Moerschel, Joseph Hackett, Roberto Minuta and Edward Vallejo guilty of seditious conspiracy.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/jury-...h-keepers-facing-sedition-charges-2023-01-23/
Click to expand...

So, you're saying 4 out of something like 900 charged were charged not with sedition but conspiracy to commit sedition? That's it? That's the totality of the so-called "insurrection?" Four guys that plotted to some degree to overthrow the government?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So, you're saying 4 out of something like 900 charged were charged not with sedition but conspiracy to commit sedition? That's it? That's the totality of the so-called "insurrection?" Four guys that plotted to some degree to overthrow the government?
Click to expand...

Sedition- participating in a conspiracy to prevent the govt, from doing its legally assigned duties in a manner beyond protected expression or protest.
The joint house and senate were doing their duty of counting the certified electoral votes and certifying the election.
The 1-6 mob committed sedition and should have been charged.
I bet on a good day, you would know that courts accept lower pleas to keep the cases from plugging up the dockets.
 
Nordberg said:
I am fine. You believe what has no proof for but a shit pile against. You have a problem. You can convince yourself of lies when needed. The 800 or so people charged and most are in jail present an argument against your Trumpiness.
Click to expand...

OK. 800 unarmed and unorganized idiots conquered the fucking United States of America without firing a shot, milled around for 3 hours and gave it back. Now shut the fuck up already!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
How nice that the Secretary of the Interior's daughter is a what amounts to a domestic terrorist...

Interior secretary's daughter is a high-ranking member of the radical group responsible for a violent protest at their mom's department in DC that was 'reminiscent of January 6'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ng-member-radical-environmentalist-group.html
Click to expand...

I read the article.....nothing to indicate a massive invasion of a gov't bldg. with intent to attack gov't representatives.....one injured officer reported but no details as to extent of injuries, how many officers, protesters, etc.

Kind of thin with regards to your subject title...comes off a more hype that substance on your part. Also, bad writing...you can't be reminiscent about something that didn't happen yet via the timeline....they should have written "similar to the later Jan. 6th episode" or something to that effect. Just saying.
 
Taichiliberal said:
I read the article.....nothing to indicate a massive invasion of a gov't bldg. with intent to attack gov't representatives.....one injured officer reported but no details as to extent of injuries, how many officers, protesters, etc.

Kind of thin with regards to your subject title...comes off a more hype that substance on your part. Also, bad writing...you can't be reminiscent about something that didn't happen yet via the timeline....they should have written "similar to the later Jan. 6th episode" or something to that effect. Just saying.
Click to expand...

The protesters took over the Interior Department's building for more than 4 days. That's pretty serious.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I read the article.....nothing to indicate a massive invasion of a gov't bldg. with intent to attack gov't representatives.....one injured officer reported but no details as to extent of injuries, how many officers, protesters, etc.

Kind of thin with regards to your subject title...comes off a more hype that substance on your part. Also, bad writing...you can't be reminiscent about something that didn't happen yet via the timeline....they should have written "similar to the later Jan. 6th episode" or something to that effect. Just saying.
Click to expand...


The protesters took over the Interior Department's building for more than 4 days. That's pretty serious.
Click to expand...

Yes, but NOT anywhere near the level of what your "heroes" did on Jan. 6th. Matters of fact, matters of history.
 
BidenPresident said:
Peaceful tour. We know.
Click to expand...

Berkeley-riots-Milo-Yiannopoulos-Antifa-1-1200x630.jpg


So, you and your friends in a group photo. Which one is you?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Yes, but NOT anywhere near the level of what your "heroes" did on Jan. 6th. Matters of fact, matters of history.
Click to expand...

They aren't "my heroes." They were a bunch of protestors and rioters, nothing more.
Click to expand...

Your revisionism is only surpassed by your insipidly stubborn repetition of MAGA talking points. You have CONSISTENTLY defended the actions of the Jan. 6th yahoos with attempts to mis-categorize (if not out right lie) about what transpired that day. This latest attempt at comparison is a prime example....on one hand you had protestors & demonstrators take over a municipal bldg. by force (no weapons) which resulted in the injury of one police officer. On the other hand, you had protestors & demonstrators (some with make shift weapons, others with hidden bombs & guns) invade the Capitol with intent to do harm (to an undetermined level) to US Senators and stop the legal confirmation (agreed by both political parties), injuring numerous police officers.

Like I said before, your article is short on details, but long on innuendo (how many protestors, who encouraged/enabled protestors, were there any local officials conducting business, etc.). Outside of protestors invading a bldg. closed to the public and a injury to a police officer, the similarities end. Try again.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Your revisionism is only surpassed by your insipidly stubborn repetition of MAGA talking points. You have CONSISTENTLY defended the actions of the Jan. 6th yahoos with attempts to mis-categorize (if not out right lie) about what transpired that day. This latest attempt at comparison is a prime example....on one hand you had protestors & demonstrators take over a municipal bldg. by force (no weapons) which resulted in the injury of one police officer. On the other hand, you had protestors & demonstrators (some with make shift weapons, others with hidden bombs & guns) invade the Capitol with intent to do harm (to an undetermined level) to US Senators and stop the legal confirmation (agreed by both political parties), injuring numerous police officers.

Like I said before, your article is short on details, but long on innuendo (how many protestors, who encouraged/enabled protestors, were there any local officials conducting business, etc.). Outside of protestors invading a bldg. closed to the public and a injury to a police officer, the similarities end. Try again.
Click to expand...

I haven't defended the actions of the crowd on Jan 6. I, instead, have looked at them in a neutral way and that resulted in my position that it was a riot, nothing more.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Your revisionism is only surpassed by your insipidly stubborn repetition of MAGA talking points. You have CONSISTENTLY defended the actions of the Jan. 6th yahoos with attempts to mis-categorize (if not out right lie) about what transpired that day. This latest attempt at comparison is a prime example....on one hand you had protestors & demonstrators take over a municipal bldg. by force (no weapons) which resulted in the injury of one police officer. On the other hand, you had protestors & demonstrators (some with make shift weapons, others with hidden bombs & guns) invade the Capitol with intent to do harm (to an undetermined level) to US Senators and stop the legal confirmation (agreed by both political parties), injuring numerous police officers.

Like I said before, your article is short on details, but long on innuendo (how many protestors, who encouraged/enabled protestors, were there any local officials conducting business, etc.). Outside of protestors invading a bldg. closed to the public and a injury to a police officer, the similarities end. Try again.
Click to expand...


I haven't defended the actions of the crowd on Jan 6. I, instead, have looked at them in a neutral way and that resulted in my position that it was a riot, nothing more.
Click to expand...

You only fool the clown you see in the mirror with that lame clap trap of yours. Repeating it does not give it any validity.

Initially, you MAGA mooks wouldn't even categorize Jan. 6th as a riot. But faced with over whelming evidence, you realized how absurd you would appear to deny even that. So the official MAGA version was that it was a protest that "got out of hand" with the instigation by "Anti-fa infiltrators" and/or a minority of rabble rousers. But again, mounting video timeline evidence put the kibosh on that lame explanation.

So now you just repeat the SOS ... with the addition of a lame attempted comparison to bolster your assertion (but, but, but you guys did it too). Logically, factually you fail. I don't expect you to concede the point....like your orange god, admitting error is not in your mindset or emotional make up. Carry on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top