Is Christies' political career over?

Is Christies' political career over?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • No

    Votes: 6 46.2%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 4 30.8%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
I think it was a really wonderful poll that came out right after the failed attempt in the senate to convict Clinton of the House's impeachment articles. The poll asked the question: who would you vote for TODAY if you had the same choices you did in November '96? Clinton or Dole? And Clinton won that poll by an even greater margin than he won the '96 election.

That IS fascinating.

It is fascinating how so many dunces in America are fine with a philanderer as a President who sexually harasses women and can't keep his dick in his pants for 8 measly years.

I think that the credit should go to our educational systems which are doing an awesome job dumbing down our youth and indoctrinating these young skulls of mush with emotional pabulum.

Yay you!
 
don't like it? either beat us at the ballot box, or sit down and shut the fuck up, or renounce your citizenship and go somewhere else.
 
silly boy. Liberals measure their success over decades and even centuries, not election cycles. Women's suffrage, child labor laws, union rights to organize, 40 hour work week, minimum wage, social security, medicare, medicaid, ADA, civil rights, gay rights, environmental laws.... and on and on.... liberal progressives won the 20th century and we will, no doubt, win this one as well.

And yet, Progressive Liberals are slowly being politically marginalized and steadily losing the political power they desire more than anything else in the world.

Conservatives have a daunting task before them; they not only have to overcome the negative insult laden Democratic campaign efforts, but also a mainstream media who have shed any hints of objectivity as the practice journalistic malfeasance.
 
don't like it? either beat us at the ballot box, or sit down and shut the fuck up, or renounce your citizenship and go somewhere else.

We are; how many times do I have to repeat it before you comprehend it? I am amused that you think winning the last two Presidential elections equates to Progressive success.

Look at the US; if not for the densely populated leftist urban centers where ignorance is bred, Democrats would rarely win anything more than City Council where they do not have to identify their political ideology.
 
23 Republican-controlled governments

13 Democratic-controlled governments

4 Democratic Governor/Republican-controlled Legislature
4 Republican Governor/Democratic-controlled Legislature
1 Republican Governor/Split Legislature
4 Democratic Governor/Split Legislature
1 Republican Governor/Non-partisan Legislature (Nebraska)

50 Total
 
There are currently 29 Republicans and 21 Democrats that hold the office of governor in the states. Additionally, 2 Democrats (one is also a member of the PPD), 1 Covenant, 1 Republican, and 1 independent serve as governors of United States Territories. Also listed is the mayor of the District of Columbia, a Democrat.
 
We are; how many times do I have to repeat it before you comprehend it? I am amused that you think winning the last two Presidential elections equates to Progressive success.

Look at the US; if not for the densely populated leftist urban centers where ignorance is bred, Democrats would rarely win anything more than City Council where they do not have to identify their political ideology.

you weren't listening. I look at the entire 20th century and equate the progress made to progressive success.

Look at the US.... republicans win where prairie dogs outnumber people. democrats win where people live together and outnumber the prairie dogs. "if not for the densely populated urban centers", this would be some other country. If you don't LIKE the fact that our population is concentrated in urban areas, fucking move to Mongolia.... and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
 
So in other words, you don't know what is "wrong" with them, it is your opinion based on nothing more substantive than "because you say so."

Thank you for clarifying that for me.

I’m amused that people who voted for Obama twice think he is remotely "Lincoln-esque."

The left might as well just minimize their comments by just posting:
"Hillary did nothing wrong; but look, there's a traffic jam."
 
you weren't listening. I look at the entire 20th century and equate the progress made to progressive success.

I read you; and it was just as dumb as the first time you made the claim. Yet in the entire 20th century, what we have seen is the steady success of Republicans winning control in the House and Senate over the last five decades and controlling a majority of the State Houses in the country.

I can’t find anything that would indicate anything OTHER than a steady erosion of the Liberal Progressive Democratic ideology.

More evidence would be the fact that Democrats know that they can only win by pretending to be Conservative on issues. It is the dishonest dialogue they engage in to fool gullible dunces into electing them.

Look at the US.... republicans win where prairie dogs outnumber people.

I am amused by this dishonest claim and must wonder why you engage in such dimwitted dishonest rhetoric.

democrats win where people live together and outnumber the prairie dogs. "if not for the densely populated urban centers", this would be some other country.

Yes, in urban areas filled with immigrants who barely speak any English and dunces that are easily fooled by dishonest partisan politicians who are willing to promise them something for nothing along with uneducated dunces who feel they are entitled to other people’s money.

The individuals in RED areas still believe in self-sufficiency and correctly distrust BIG Government much more than BIG corporations.

If you don't LIKE the fact that our population is concentrated in urban areas, fucking move to Mongolia.... and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Really Commander Dimwit? If I don’t like it I can just run away like you? Wrong ignoramus; I will stay right here and work hard to ensure that empty headed dullards like you who vote for dishonest lying assholes like Obama do not attain the political power they arrogantly presume they are entitled to.

Sorry if it bothers you arrogant dunces so bad. I know how repugnant morons like you find the Constitution, Freedom and Liberty.

Once again we see that your ignorant talking points about “winning” and change coming were not fact based, but merely the uninformed buffoonery Liberals like you love to wallow in.

Don’t you have some poor Mexicans you need to take advantage of?
 
I read you; and it was just as dumb as the first time you made the claim. Yet in the entire 20th century, what we have seen is the steady success of Republicans winning control in the House and Senate over the last five decades and controlling a majority of the State Houses in the country.
people who equate liberals with democrats and conservatives with republicans are really too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.


I can’t find anything that would indicate anything OTHER than a steady erosion of the Liberal Progressive Democratic ideology.

other than women's suffrage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, rights of workers to collectively bargain, minimum wage, social security, environmental protection, medicare, medicaid, civil rights and gay rights - to name just a few....

I am amused by this dishonest claim and must wonder why you engage in such dimwitted dishonest rhetoric.

those issues above were NOT progressive liberal issues? really?


Really Commander Dimwit? If I don’t like it I can just run away like you? Wrong ignoramus; I will stay right here and work hard to ensure that empty headed dullards like you who vote for dishonest lying assholes like Obama do not attain the political power they arrogantly presume they are entitled to.

Sorry if it bothers you arrogant dunces so bad. I know how repugnant morons like you find the Constitution, Freedom and Liberty.

Once again we see that your ignorant talking points about “winning” and change coming were not fact based, but merely the uninformed buffoonery Liberals like you love to wallow in.

it doesn't bother me that my opposition has not rolled over and played dead. That would make victory taste nowhere near as sweet as it has throughout my entire lifetime.
 
people who equate liberals with democrats and conservatives with republicans are really too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

Dunces who claim they are winning while they are actually losing are really too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

Dunces who are dishonest hyper partisan dimwits are also too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

That’s why I merely point at you laughingly and say; “look; an idiot”.

other than women's suffrage, child labor laws, 40 hour work week, rights of workers to collectively bargain, minimum wage, social security, environmental protection, medicare, medicaid, civil rights and gay rights - to name just a few....

I am amused that you think these are issues unique to Progressives or that the Liberals of the past are anything like the ignorant dunces running the Democratic Party today.

But then, you’re too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

those issues above were NOT progressive liberal issues? really?

Really?

it doesn't bother me that my opposition has not rolled over and played dead. That would make victory taste nowhere near as sweet as it has throughout my entire lifetime.

Apparently it does because you typically rant like a lunatic and keep telling us to fucking leave.

How did it go? Oh yeah; If you don't LIKE the fact that our population is concentrated in urban areas, fucking move to Mongolia.... and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Yes Commander Dimwit; you’re well beyond mere stupid.
 
Dunces who claim they are winning while they are actually losing are really too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

Dunces who are dishonest hyper partisan dimwits are also too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.

That’s why I merely point at you laughingly and say; “look; an idiot”.



I am amused that you think these are issues unique to Progressives or that the Liberals of the past are anything like the ignorant dunces running the Democratic Party today.

But then, you’re too fucking stupid to carry on a conversation with.



Really?



Apparently it does because you typically rant like a lunatic and keep telling us to fucking leave.

How did it go? Oh yeah; If you don't LIKE the fact that our population is concentrated in urban areas, fucking move to Mongolia.... and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Yes Commander Dimwit; you’re well beyond mere stupid.

the fact that you would attempt to try and claim any of those advances in our national culture as "conservative" issues is laughable.

and really... if more and more people are moving to urban areas, and urban areas are traditionally democratic... either sit down, shut the fuck up, somehow change that demographic dynamic or leave.... your choice.
 
I go away for the long weekend and the Conservatives come out of the woodwork on this thread... yet, I see none of them have addressed my questions or points that illustrate their hypocrisy.
 
the fact that you would attempt to try and claim any of those advances in our national culture as "conservative" issues is laughable.

That would be because you are an uninformed dishonest dunce.

Here’s the traditional definition of Liberalism; show me where you fit in with it:

lib•er•al•ism
ˈlɪb ər əˌlɪz əm, ˈlɪb rə-Show Spelled [lib-er-uh-liz-uh m, lib-ruh-] Show IPA
noun
1. the quality or state of being liberal, as in behavior or attitude.
2. a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.
3. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) the principles and practices of a liberal party in politics.
4. a movement in modern Protestantism that emphasizes freedom from tradition and authority, the adjustment of religious beliefs to scientific conceptions, and the development of spiritual capacities.


This better describes MY political views better than any of the ignorant buffoonish dogma that has erupted from your keyboard.

and really... if more and more people are moving to urban areas, and urban areas are traditionally democratic... either sit down, shut the fuck up, somehow change that demographic dynamic or leave.... your choice.

Once again you illustrate how you are just another Liberal dunce who doesn’t have the slightest clue about our form of Government, the Constitution and how Presidents are elected.

People are constantly moving to and from urban areas; so what? I stated quite clearly that they are full of willful idiots thinking they are entitled to other people’s money. But alas, the obvious is too complex for someone with such a tiny brain and stuck on hyper partisan stupidity.

I don’t need to sit down, or shut the fuck up you arrogant dunce; but your comments are of the typical Fascist tone we expect from dishonest hyper partisan dumbasses on the left who are permanently stuck on stupid.

Once again; we aren’t moving towards your dimwitted ideological nonsense; as evidenced by recent elections over the last decade, if anything we are moving away; and rightly so because people with even half a brain do not want this great nation to resemble Venezuela, which is what Liberal ideologues stuck on dogma would do.
Dismissed Commander Dunce; once again you fail in comprehension, ideology and argument.
 
I go away for the long weekend and the Conservatives come out of the woodwork on this thread...

Opposed to Liberals crawling out of their holes?

yet, I see none of them have addressed my questions or points that illustrate their hypocrisy.

You seldom “see” much that doesn’t already fit your narrow, myopic and uninformed partisan views based on the pabulum you are fed by the DNC. So no one is surprised by another laughably stupid post by a comedic dunce prone to uttering incredibly stupid things.
 
That would be because you are an uninformed dishonest dunce.

Here’s the traditional definition of Liberalism; show me where you fit in with it:

lib•er•al•ism
ˈlɪb ər əˌlɪz əm, ˈlɪb rə-Show Spelled [lib-er-uh-liz-uh m, lib-ruh-] Show IPA
noun
1. the quality or state of being liberal, as in behavior or attitude.
2. a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.
3. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) the principles and practices of a liberal party in politics.
4. a movement in modern Protestantism that emphasizes freedom from tradition and authority, the adjustment of religious beliefs to scientific conceptions, and the development of spiritual capacities.


This better describes MY political views better than any of the ignorant buffoonish dogma that has erupted from your keyboard.



Once again you illustrate how you are just another Liberal dunce who doesn’t have the slightest clue about our form of Government, the Constitution and how Presidents are elected.

People are constantly moving to and from urban areas; so what? I stated quite clearly that they are full of willful idiots thinking they are entitled to other people’s money. But alas, the obvious is too complex for someone with such a tiny brain and stuck on hyper partisan stupidity.

I don’t need to sit down, or shut the fuck up you arrogant dunce; but your comments are of the typical Fascist tone we expect from dishonest hyper partisan dumbasses on the left who are permanently stuck on stupid.

Once again; we aren’t moving towards your dimwitted ideological nonsense; as evidenced by recent elections over the last decade, if anything we are moving away; and rightly so because people with even half a brain do not want this great nation to resemble Venezuela, which is what Liberal ideologues stuck on dogma would do.
Dismissed Commander Dunce; once again you fail in comprehension, ideology and argument.

lol @ the "traditional" definition of liberal. Did that traditional definition describe the people who were demonstrating in the streets for women's suffrage? How about union protests? How about civil rights marches?

and AGAIN.... you want to look back on the last decade and claim victory for conservatism, but did you actually turn back ANY of the gains liberals had made? Did you privatize social security? did you do away with the department of education? did you institute a flat tax? did you amend the constitution to deify straight marriage, or to overturn Roe v. Wade? Nope. Conservatives keep from losing MORE of their shirts for a decade and they claim a huge victory. Liberals, on the other hand, look at the arch of their success in terms of centuries. Things that were uber-liberal a half a century ago are now right in the middle of the main stream. That's a fact.

Sign at a tea bagger rally: "Keep your socialist hands off my Medicare"

you can't make that shit up! Pure comedy gold!
 
Back
Top