ZenMode
Well-known member
According to who?Argument from randU fallacy. It is not possible to measure the global sea level.
According to who?Argument from randU fallacy. It is not possible to measure the global sea level.
Wrong question.According to who?
no matter how you see it, there's eventually always a who. Someone has to make a determination on how things work to make that claim.Wrong question.
I think you meant to ask 'According to WHAT?'
There is no 'who'. There is only a 'what'.no matter how you see it, there's eventually always a who. Someone has to make a determination on how things work to make that claim.
Indeed. You're right up there with the best of them!However, as I already know, several posters believe they can make things true by simply saying them... sometimes over and over.
There is no 'who'. I'd suggest learning some mathematics (and some logic).So, based on what/who is are the ocean levels not rising?
See above.Oh, let me guess... It's according to science, right? According to science, water levels can't rise?
That you are. This isn't the first time you keep mindlessly asking the same question over and over and over and over and over, even though it's already been answered.So predictable.So transparent.
RQAAno matter how you see it, there's eventually always a who. Someone has to make a determination on how things work to make that claim.
However, as I already know, several posters believe they can make things true by simply saying them... sometimes over and over.
So, based on what/who is are the ocean levels not rising?
Pivot fallacy.Oh, let me guess... It's according to science, right? According to science, water levels can't rise?
Not who...what. Mathematics. You simply deny mathematics. This isn't the first time you've done this either.According to who?
Remind me of the answer to the question of why ocean levels aren't rising or can't rise. I "forgot" what you said.RQAA
Pivot fallacy.
Which part mathematics says water can't rise and hasn't risen?Not who...what. Mathematics. You simply deny mathematics. This isn't the first time you've done this either.
It is not possible to measure the global sea level, the temperature of the Earth, the global snow and ice on Earth, the global atmospheric amount of carbon dioxide, the emissivity of the Earth, the pH of the oceans, etc. Your stupid religion claims to know these magick numbers. You deny statistical math, probability math, random number math, and algebra.
RQAARemind me of the answer to the question of why ocean levels aren't rising or can't rise. I "forgot" what you said.
RQAAWhich part mathematics says water can't rise and hasn't risen?
Link?Not who...what. Mathematics. You simply deny mathematics. This isn't the first time you've done this either.
It is not possible to measure the global sea level, the temperature of the Earth, the global snow and ice on Earth, the global atmospheric amount of carbon dioxide, the emissivity of the Earth, the pH of the oceans, etc. Your stupid religion claims to know these magick numbers. You deny statistical math, probability math, random number math, and algebra.
Which part mathematics says water can't rise and hasn't risen?
RQAA