WinterBorn
Verified User
to for the sole purpose? what
What? First of all, your question makes no sense.
Second of all, you are the one pushing the idea of implants to control us. You answer the question.
to for the sole purpose? what
right.What? First of all, your question makes no sense.
Second of all, you are the one pushing the idea of implants to control us. You answer the question.
When was yours installed again?right.
nobody talks about neutral link or chips in the brain.
I'm making it all up.
you're right.
right.
nobody talks about neutral link or chips in the brain.
I'm making it all up.
you're right.
right.People talk about a lot of things. Lizard people who rule the world. Elvis is still alive. And yes, they talk about neural links and chips in the brain.
But you are the only one I have seen talking about foregoing the entire internet from fear. Or of holding your children back.
do better.When was yours installed again?
Children now have better access to information and more of it but it also requires less human interaction.
In your opinions is this a positive or negative for children?
right.
because it's smart to let a corportion put a chip in your head.
good dads chip their children.
do better.
winterbourne the big pharma lackey loves your style.
it does seem like it's having a negative impact on children, they are interacting less, grow up more isolated, socially crippled.
Not everyone, of course, but it does seem to be a thing that is happening. If I had children, I would disallow cell phones, and would limit computer access to doing homework and maybe an hour chatting with friends. Outside of that, it's outside to play with other children, or off to the library.
My parents were always chasing me outside to get away from the TV, which they thought were having a negative impact on me. I'm glad they did.
what if all the other kids have the banker control chip in their heads and your kid cant get a loan without it?My style? What do you know about my style?
I mean other than putting words in my mouth.
blah blah.Children should not have unfettered and unsupervised access to the internet.
But that does not mean they should not have any access at all.
Have you read Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt? (it's about kids and social media)Technology can be a great addition to a child's life. The almost unlimited knowledge at their fingertips is unlike anything in history.
At the same time, they need supervision while doing it. There are many other things that will grab their attention.
Have you read Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt? (it's about kids and social media)
what if all the other kids have the banker control chip in their heads and your kid cant get a loan without it?
will you "hold your kid back"?
blah blah.
it's best to start with small amounts of cocaine.
No i'm not.Now you are getting ridiculous.
It's an incredible read and I've heard numerous parents and administrators at my daughter's school talk about it. Basically it's about how social media (negatively) affect young kids, especially girls.No I haven't. I'll have to look for it.