Is the bird flu fake?

It's pretty easy to spot a sick bird, Void.
Chickens/birds/humans can be infected before showing symptoms.. aka looking sick. I mean, that is literally the basis for killing all of the chickens around the sick one.
Are you saying the so-called 'bird flu' is measles???
Ignoring more "playing stupid".
You are surrounded by birds.
Ok. If that allows you to move on, I will agree that, in the world around me, there are birds.
One human died? In a world population of 8.2 billion people??

OMG! Fear! Fear! Run! Run!
Again... the goal is to prevent a widespread outbreak because H5N1 is really deadly.

So, why do you think H5N1 is currently spreading DESPITE the measures taken to stop it? Those measures being "stamping out" of large numbers of chickens near the sick ones?

Given the drastic measures to slow the spread, what do you think would happen if we just followed your suggestion and just removed only the obvious sick ones?
 
Inversion fallacy.
rectal-cranial inversion fallacy

1520200536809
 
Chickens/birds/humans can be infected before showing symptoms.. aka looking sick. I mean, that is literally the basis for killing all of the chickens around the sick one. Ignoring more "playing stupid".Ok. If that allows you to move on, I will agree that, in the world around me, there are birds. Again... the goal is to prevent a widespread outbreak because H5N1 is really deadly.

So, why do you think H5N1 is currently spreading DESPITE the measures taken to stop it? Those measures being "stamping out" of large numbers of chickens near the sick ones?

Given the drastic measures to slow the spread, what do you think would happen if we just followed your suggestion and just removed only the obvious sick ones?
Birds aren't real... the internets told me so!

 
Chickens/birds/humans can be infected before showing symptoms.. aka looking sick. I mean, that is literally the basis for killing all of the chickens around the sick one. Ignoring more "playing stupid".Ok. If that allows you to move on, I will agree that, in the world around me, there are birds. Again... the goal is to prevent a widespread outbreak because H5N1 is really deadly.

So, why do you think H5N1 is currently spreading DESPITE the measures taken to stop it? Those measures being "stamping out" of large numbers of chickens near the sick ones?

Given the drastic measures to slow the spread, what do you think would happen if we just followed your suggestion and just removed only the obvious sick ones?
What "spreading"??

There is no reason to kill healthy birds.

RQAA. Stop mindlessly repeating your questions that have already been answered.
 
How do you know the birds around the sick one aren't infected?
It must really suck going through life in a constant state of paranoia about yourself and every living creature around you "potentially being infected". Thankfully, there IS a better way! :)

If a bird is behaving in the same manner as it typically does on a daily basis, and it isn't displaying any symptoms of being sick, then why should any rational person believe that the bird is sick?
The rational reason is that, by the time the bird/chicken is found to be sick, there is a high likelihood that is has already spread H5N1 to birds around it, but those birds aren't showing symptoms, yet.
Your so-called "rational reason" is based upon your irrational fear of a bird being sick even though it isn't displaying any symptoms of being sick.
So, how do you actually bring an end to the spread if you're only responding by removing obviously sick chickens?
How do you bring an end to the spread? Stop betting.
 
ROFLMAO. Talk about being completely ignorant of how flu and immunity work.
He just demonstrated that he does.
There are thousands and potentially millions of different strains of flu viruses. You would need immunity for every one of those viruses and any possible mutations that might become deadly.
There are currently no active viruses of the influenza series that are lethal.

Viruses don't mutate. They are not living things.
 
Again... separate the sick chicken from the other chickens.

You should really take your own advice.
"Again... separate the sick chicken from the other chickens.'

It is a fact that a) H5N1 is extremely deadly for chickens and other poultry. It's also a fact that chickens can and will be infected before they appear sick. It's also a fact that some number of them will spread the virus to other chickens before they appear sick.

So, your plan, separating the obviously sick chickens from the rest, is going allow the virus to spread uncontrollably through the flock and increase the risk of it spreading to all humans around the flock.

That's really your plan?
 
No, It's quite relevant. You cannot just discard your ignorance and pretend it isn't there.

You still can't tell whether a bird is healthy or not, can you? How clueless.
Ok. Clearly you're doing your usual moronic trolling. We both know that sick chickens will look healthy and those sick chickens will spread the disease to other chickens and possibly humans before they look sick.

So, when you want to stop acting like a retard, let me know.
 
Chickens/birds/humans can be infected before showing symptoms.. aka looking sick.
A possibility is not a definite. Why should any rational person believe that an apparently healthy chicken is sick?
I mean, that is literally the basis for killing all of the chickens around the sick one.
Paranoia is not a rational basis.
So, why do you think H5N1 is currently spreading DESPITE the measures taken to stop it? Those measures being "stamping out" of large numbers of chickens near the sick ones?
Because you can't stop the spread of a disease by killing healthy chickens.
Given the drastic measures to slow the spread, what do you think would happen if we just followed your suggestion and just removed only the obvious sick ones?
I think that there would be A LOT less dead chickens.
 
What I know or don't know is irrelevant because sick, contagious birds will look healthy for some period of time.
Why should any rational person believe that a bird is sick if it is behaving in a typical manner and it isn't displaying any symptoms of illness?

Why should any rational person believe that possibilities are definites?
 
Back
Top