Is This Radical or Just Plain Crazy
- Thread starter BryanJ
- Start date
So you say.
She's a leftist? :shrug:
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Lol. I forgot who it was but about a month ago someone said that and right away everyone accused them of being you.
evince gives Fruit Loops a bad name...
Wasn't Zero Hedge pushing the Jade Helm nonsense?
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Oh, she knows how to use Google, she finds a lot of links, her problem is she usually doesn't read beyond the title before posting them.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
You should hear the ones about his “crazy” conservative friends. Or when he was speeding in his expensive boat and pulled over by the Coast Guard. It was a traumatic experience
Of course Jarod doesn’t always lie
Like the time the hurricane hit his area and was out of power. Instead of Jarod letting people take residence in his offices and seek shelter from the sweltering heat, Jarod took his spawn to Disney World
Or
When his wife supposedly was diagnosed with cancer he refused to pay for needed care even though he supposedly makes $400,000 a year
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
You'd think a drug smuggler would make more than that.
I don't know--I wasn't familiar with Zero Hedge until your post. Another theory:
"Russians were behind the Texas furor over the Jade Helm 15 federal military exercise nearly three years ago, which drew so much concern that Gov. Greg Abbott directed the State Guard to monitor the operation, former CIA director Michael Hayden said Thursday."
Last year ZeroHedge had a new conspiracy out every week.
Do you think he'd be keen enough to make it that far up the chain? He doesn't seem smart enough to make it past street level.
Jade Helm 15 conspiracy theories - Wikipedia
The Jade Helm 15 conspiracy theories were based on the Jade Helm 15 United States military training exercise which took place in multiple U.S. states in the summer of 2015, starting on July 15 and ending on September 15.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Helm_15_conspiracy_theories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Helm_15_conspiracy_theories#/media/File:Jade_helm_15.jpeg
evince
Truthmatters
https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voter-fraud
Myth of Voter Fraud
It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly, and falsely, claimed millions voted illegally. Yet examination after examination of voter fraud claims reveal fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Election officials and leaders of the president’s own party also agree fraud is not widespread.
The Brennan Center's seminal report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" conclusively demonstrated most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. And numerous other studies have reached the same conclusion. In a recent report, "Noncitizen Voting: The Missing Millions," the Brennan Center debunked President Trump's claim that millions improperly voted in the 2016 election.
Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find solutions that address actual problems instead of imposing policies that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.
Resources on Voter Fraud Claims
Credible research and investigation demonstrates fraud by voters at the polls is exceedingly rare.
Analysis: Noncitizen Voting is Vanishingly Rare
For years, the Brennan Center has collected research showing that voter fraud is extraordinarily rare. We've reviewed the literature on one subset of voter fraud claims — the allegation that ineligible noncitizens are voting in large numbers.
In Their Own Words: Officials Refuting Trump's Voter Fraud Allegations
Donald Trump has made repeated claims that millions voted illegally in 2016. This rhetoric around voter fraud has been debunked in study after study. Election officials and leaders of the president’s own party have spoken out against these false claims.
The Justice Department’s Voter Fraud Scandal: Lessons
A decade ago, the Justice Department was upended by scandal after investigations revealed it wielded its power to disenfranchise voters. As the new president threatens investigations into voter fraud, mistakes of the past give concern for the future.
The Truth About Voter Fraud
In 2007, the Brennan Center for Justice carefully examined allegations of fraud to get at the truth behind the claims. The conclusion was clear — most allegations are baseless.
Last edited:
evince
Truthmatters
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage
The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
Your link does not support your claim.
That's why you just posted the URL instead of citing any corroborating text.
How do you explain Trump's win, then?
You just Google shit and post the first thing that looks good without reading it, don't you?
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
It's the new normal.
In a polarized nation, all the energy is at the poles.
Centrism is irrelevant.
The centrist choices, neither fish nor fowl, have proven to be a figment of our imaginations.
The choice is Republican fascism or Democratic socialism.
Those refusing to choose between the two real options leave themselves out of the choice process.
Fantasy time has gotten too non-productive. It's time to get real.
In a polarized nation, all the energy is at the poles.
Centrism is irrelevant.
The centrist choices, neither fish nor fowl, have proven to be a figment of our imaginations.
The choice is Republican fascism or Democratic socialism.
Those refusing to choose between the two real options leave themselves out of the choice process.
Fantasy time has gotten too non-productive. It's time to get real.