PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
You wouldn't understand what I did. It was "big swamp" stuff.
..
You wouldn't understand what I did. It was "big swamp" stuff.
Of course. That's just math. As anyone who cares to look can see, neither candidate received more than 50% of the vote. Even magical, wonderful Queen Hill herself only received 48.2% of the vote, a fact no Democrat or Left-Winger has ever posted that I've seen. All I've seen is the ubiquitous "3 millions votes" bullshit. Something you and I both know is both deceptive and dishonest in presentation.
It's not a "debate tactic", it's a facet. Ten people can look at a diamond from ten different sides and truthfully tell you what they see even though each view is different. What they see is determined by the facet of their viewpoint. In this case, there are multiple mental facets such as cultural differences, political bias, national bias, mental health, etc. All views can be truthfully told even if they are factually flawed. In the diamond analogy one facet's view may not reveal a fundamental flaw in the diamond even though the person honestly doesn't see it.
Continuing with this analogy, the hard part for the person with view of the flaw has a difficult time proving to a person who sees no flaw that such a flaw exists.
The Republicans who whine about welfare and "hand-outs" will be first in line, hand extended, to receive their free gubment money. When the dust settles, they have no choice but to admit that free-market capitalism is dangerous. Socialist capitalism is the way forward.
Is Snark and Sarcasm your new debate tactic? If so, you will fit in with the majority of far Left and far Right members of this forum.Hello Dutch Uncle,
Facet, debate tactic, semantics. Look. New shimmer is a floor wax. No, it's a desert topping. Hold it you two, it's both.
if you don't want to be treated like a lib'rul you have to post something from time to time which is not a lib'rul meme......
I know, I am a liitle trump cocksucker, but he pats me on the head (both of them) and tells me that he likes it so much......
Hello PoliTalker
Is Snark and Sarcasm your new debate tactic? If so, you will fit in with the majority of far Left and far Right members of this forum.
Hello Dutch Uncle,
Anyone who wants to talk primarily about the issues does not fit in well around here.
LOL. So I've noticed. Lots of complaints about "sock puppets" by those with lots of sock puppets too. Strange but also amusing.
Hello Dutch Uncle,
Oh yeah, I totally don't get that.
I just find the whole sock thing silly. I don't get the pretense. What are these people? Practicing / aspiring actors? That seems like so much work. No thanks.
You can only be one person at a time.
Why not just be the same person all the time? Be the best person you can.
A person's life is what that person makes it. It only seems logical to make it the best life one can.
Agreed about the sock thing. I think it's because they are weak egos and seek to puff themselves up by giving themselves virtual handjobs via sock puppets. It also allows them to double or triple their attacks on those who disagree with them.
Good morning Dutch Uncle,
The way I see it, if somebody is attacking another person? Instead of their political view?
That is the same as conceding the political argument.
It's like saying: "OK, I can't really come up with a better political argument, so instead I am going to run away from that, change the subject, and, as a distraction, talk about the person who voiced the view I disagree with."
And if it is a post that does both?
Attacks the political view AND the poster who made it?
That is the same as saying: "I don't feel confident enough in my position to let it stand on it's own merit, so I am going to help prop it up with this personal attack, you know, because my political view is so weak/compromised that it needs help."
Agreed 100% Of course the sock puppet user/attacker won't ever admit it, but certainly all the intelligent, educated and sane users can see that a person who slings insults instead of responds with a logical argument for or against a topic is a person who comes up short on intelligence, education and/or sanity. It's pretty easy to spot those people. What is a bit more of a challenge is spotting their sock puppets but theidiotspeople who use socks end up revealing themselves over time.
Some people are braggarts, some are not. Some are extroverts, some are introverts. That's the real world, but this virtual world some people are their natural selves and some are their hidden selves; most commonly their darker selves.I think there are a lot of people who are really smarter than they come across, or could be smarter, but they are simply in the habit of acting dumber than they really are. This gets into psychology. The reasons they do this are complicated and may have to do with herd mentality and wanting to 'fit in.' If these habits are well-ingrained from childhood, they can become locked in as adults. Change is possible, but difficult.
Think of the phenomenon where black children can be mocked if they 'act too white,' as a possible example. Children want to 'fit in.' (So do adults.) Some school social group situations result in children who feel embarrassed to excel. A clique in school could be led by an individual of a certain intelligence level. Members of that clique might fear expulsion from the clique if they display intelligence greater than that of the most popular person, so they establish the habit of dumbing themselves down. This habit becomes set for life. The same phenomenon can exist in a couple.
Humans are creatures of habit. Habits are mental. Habits are difficult to change....
Some people are braggarts, some are not. Some are extroverts, some are introverts. That's the real world, but this virtual world some people are their natural selves and some are their hidden selves; most commonly their darker selves.
There little reason for a person to hide themselves on a forum where they are already hidden behind an anonymous user name. That said, your comment about "herd mentality" still applies since forum members usually pick a side and rarely are willing to stand in the middle.
Yes, people are creatures of habit but online they are more like "A drunk man's words are a sober man's thoughts" since they are safe behind an anonymous keyboard.
Rarely are members as Teddy Roosevelt once spoke about in his famous "Citizenship in a Republic" speech:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
People respond to good examples and good leadership so we each should strive to be good examples and good leaders. We are human, so we're not perfect, but those who try will be noticed by similarly good people.
Hello Dutch Uncle,
Wow, awesome post:
What great words of wisdom. And a great thanks to you, sir, as I had never before seen that quote. And it sure sounds like him, doesn't it? He wasn't daunted by anything. He went. He did. Nothing held him back. And he meant well, thought well of others. What a great leader. Natural born leader. Great uniter. A selfless man. Wow. When I think of all he did for this country. All the national monuments and parks, preserved open space. He NEVER would have allowed drilling in those preserved spaces. Wow. We were so lucky to have a leader like that. Wish we had a leader like that now.
We could sure use one just about now...