christiefan915
Catalyst
Pointing out conservative hypocrisy and double standards is not #WHATABOUTISM, leggiecrite.
Isn't it curious; within five minutes of the Times breaking the Trump tax story.....
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
Pointing out conservative hypocrisy and double standards is not #WHATABOUTISM, leggiecrite.
That's how stupid he is, what is there to be proud of being a lefty?? He's proud to be dumb???
DEMOCRATS are using an online campaign donation tool that raises ethical concerns
Every election cycle seems to reveal ethics issues when it comes to fundraising efforts by local, state and national political candidates. Right now, we are seeing something new and potentially significant, which is the rise of anonymous online donations.
One big driver is the online donation tool for DEMOCRATS called ActBlue.
According to ActBlue's own website, a majority of DEMOCRAT Senate and House campaigns, along with the DEMOCRAT Congressional Campaign Committee, DEMOCRAT Senatorial Campaign Committee, DEMOCRAT Governors Association, over one-third of statewide campaigns, and progressive advocacy organizations around the country use ActBlue for fundraising.
The website allows credit card donations that are not verified, so anyone from any country in the world can give many small donations to a candidate or group with no paper trail.
Federal Election Commission regulations don't require political campaigns to list the names, addresses and occupations of individual donors who contribute less than $200 in an election cycle. Campaigns are only required to report the total amount received from these small donors as "unitemized" individual contributions.
For example, $53 million of then-senatorial candidate Beto O'Rourke's $79 million total came through such contributions on ActBlue.
If you buy something online but type in the wrong ZIP code or address, you get a red box letting you know you made a mistake just in case someone else stole your credit card.
This is the bank's instant verification process, which ActBlue refuses to let the banks use when moving money to campaigns.
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/05/02/democrats-are-using-an-online-campaign-donation-tool-that-raises-ethical-concerns/
Every election cycle seems to reveal ethics issues when it comes to fundraising efforts by local, state and national political candidates. Right now, we are seeing something new and potentially significant, which is the rise of anonymous online donations.
One big driver is the online donation tool for DEMOCRATS called ActBlue.
According to ActBlue's own website, a majority of DEMOCRAT Senate and House campaigns, along with the DEMOCRAT Congressional Campaign Committee, DEMOCRAT Senatorial Campaign Committee, DEMOCRAT Governors Association, over one-third of statewide campaigns, and progressive advocacy organizations around the country use ActBlue for fundraising.
The website allows credit card donations that are not verified, so anyone from any country in the world can give many small donations to a candidate or group with no paper trail.
Federal Election Commission regulations don't require political campaigns to list the names, addresses and occupations of individual donors who contribute less than $200 in an election cycle. Campaigns are only required to report the total amount received from these small donors as "unitemized" individual contributions.
For example, $53 million of then-senatorial candidate Beto O'Rourke's $79 million total came through such contributions on ActBlue.
If you buy something online but type in the wrong ZIP code or address, you get a red box letting you know you made a mistake just in case someone else stole your credit card.
This is the bank's instant verification process, which ActBlue refuses to let the banks use when moving money to campaigns.
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/05/02/democrats-are-using-an-online-campaign-donation-tool-that-raises-ethical-concerns/
Not in the least MoonBat. I don't like the lies promoted by the PHONY media and the DNC. You, being an unintelligent dumb fuck, are too stupid to care.
^Lying douchebag who is also a left wing partisan hack. Hey douchebag, how long does it take to create an add? Any ideas douchebag?
Of course not; you have your empty head shoved up Biden's ass.
How long does it take to create a TV ad?
Doug Garnett, Creative Director and Director, TV commercials
Answered May 29, 2018 · Author has 2.5K answers and 2.4M answer views
Originally Answered: How long does it take to film a TV commercial?
How about this answer… “it depends”…
Let me back out first to “how long does it take to make a TV commercial?”
I recommend 3–4 months to do it right. Sometimes there’s reason to take longer. Sometimes there are ways to do it faster. But recognize commercials aren’t easy to make succeed - so more planning time is good.
Figure there are steps:
Concepting (including research with consumers to learn about what’ needed to make it succeed). Primarily, this is used to look at options - different ways to cause the result that is needed.
Scripting/boarding (getting a “final” script from the chosen concept).
Pre-production. Planning for shooting and the edit.
Shooting (Principal Photography) (the actual “filming”).
Editing/Post-production (cutting the film together, getting final voice over, adding in motion graphics and animations, all sound and sound mixing, color correction, etc.)
In other words, it takes far longer to MAKE a TV Commercial than to FILM it. But what about filming days?
For a good commercial, the minimum is 2 days. Sometimes there’s a way to do 1 day (we’ve done it) but that’s entirely the exception.
That said, depending on the concept, it may take as many as 7–10 days.
And, major brands often combine shoots for different commercials into very long shoots of 2 weeks.
The Biden ad came out at press time. Dumb fucks.
Doug Garnett, Creative Director and Director, TV commercials
Answered May 29, 2018 · Author has 2.5K answers and 2.4M answer views
Originally Answered: How long does it take to film a TV commercial?
How about this answer… “it depends”…
Let me back out first to “how long does it take to make a TV commercial?”
I recommend 3–4 months to do it right. Sometimes there’s reason to take longer. Sometimes there are ways to do it faster. But recognize commercials aren’t easy to make succeed - so more planning time is good.
Figure there are steps:
Concepting (including research with consumers to learn about what’ needed to make it succeed). Primarily, this is used to look at options - different ways to cause the result that is needed.
Scripting/boarding (getting a “final” script from the chosen concept).
Pre-production. Planning for shooting and the edit.
Shooting (Principal Photography) (the actual “filming”).
Editing/Post-production (cutting the film together, getting final voice over, adding in motion graphics and animations, all sound and sound mixing, color correction, etc.)
In other words, it takes far longer to MAKE a TV Commercial than to FILM it. But what about filming days?
For a good commercial, the minimum is 2 days. Sometimes there’s a way to do 1 day (we’ve done it) but that’s entirely the exception.
That said, depending on the concept, it may take as many as 7–10 days.
And, major brands often combine shoots for different commercials into very long shoots of 2 weeks.
The Biden ad came out at press time. Dumb fucks.
Pointing out conservative hypocrisy and double standards is not #WHATABOUTISM, leggiecrite.
Just a few hours after the release of the report on Sunday, the former vice president’s campaign started selling merchandise – T-shirts, buttons, and stickers – that say “I paid more income taxes than Donald Trump.”
And Biden’s campaign also quickly posted a video on Twitter that compares how much in taxes Americans such as teachers, firefighters and nurses typically pay compared to the president.
Yeah, it's just a HUGE coincidence in the minds of liars, hacks and morons.
And Biden’s campaign also quickly posted a video on Twitter that compares how much in taxes Americans such as teachers, firefighters and nurses typically pay compared to the president.
Yeah, it's just a HUGE coincidence in the minds of liars, hacks and morons.
This may be the biggest lie the PHONY media has pushed onto the American sheeple. Only the dumbest among us can believe anything that gossip rag puts out.
I've seen no evidence that the failing New York Times has seen the president's actual tax documents.
Have you?
Has anyone?
We're just supposed to trust them?
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
You claim that a TV ad was put out within five minutes of this breaking news. It really only takes a couple of hours to put together a political ad these days, but not five minutes.
Is that so?
Who told you that?
How do you explain the campaign merchandise that was supposedly ready to ship?
Maddow’s show echoed the White House statement, saying that Trump had paid $38 million in taxes that year, and that he had taken a large write-down of $103 million. In total, Trump made more than $150 million in income that year, according to the show.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/14/trump-tax-returns-rachel-maddow-says-acquired-2005-form.html
So Trump paid more tax in one year, than 50% of the country will pay in 100 years!
christiefan915
Catalyst
The same way winning Superbowl jerseys are being printed and ready to ship right after the game is over.
countryboy
Verified User
They're not even trying to hide it anymore.