Now you are spouting nonsense. ' Non-binding recognition ' ? You are developing troll-like responses.non-binding, meaningless courtesy recogniztion. There was no Security Council involved so it wasn't anything of any meaning.
Of course it would appear as nonsense to anyone who isn't familiar with how the UN operates.Now you are spouting nonsense.
Correct. I'll leave that homework to the student to find out what "non-binding" means, but no member State is bound/obligated to recognize Palestine in any way.' Non-binding recognition ' ?
... but I will never be guilty of overestimating them. Enjoy!You also underestimate the power of the UNGA.
Hey- tell the class what your ' Binding recognition of statehood ' means - and provide an example of a Chapter 7 Security Council resolution.Of course it would appear as nonsense to anyone who isn't familiar with how the UN operates.
Correct. I'll leave that homework to the student to find out what "non-binding" means, but no member State is bound/obligated to recognize Palestine in any way.
... but I will never be guilty of overestimating them. Enjoy!
Hey- tell the class what your ' Binding recognition of statehood ' means
You just pivoted. This has nothing to do with recognizing Palestine but in punishing Israel. Those are two separate and distinct concepts.- and provide an example of a Chapter 7 Security Council resolution.
You just fudged. Get your requests straight.I shall insist. Fudge will not suffice.
You've failed to provide an example of a UN Resolution which provides any ' Binding ' recognition of statehood. You're a side-stepping fraud. Your claim was nonsense from the outset.Class,
A "Binding Recognition of Statehood" is comprised of the following:
Sovereignty: A state must have a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Effective Control: The government seeking recognition must exercise effective control over its territory and population.
International Law: Recognition decisions are often influenced by principles of international law, including respect for territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs.
Political Considerations: Diplomatic recognition can be influenced by political, strategic, and economic interests of the recognizing state.
UN Membership: While the UN itself doesn't grant recognition, membership in the UN can lend legitimacy and encourage other states to recognize a new state.
An example of this was South Sudan's admission in July of 2011.
You just pivoted. This has nothing to do with recognizing Palestine but in punishing Israel. Those are two separate and distinct concepts.
You just fudged. Get your requests straight.
Incorrect, I presented the admission of South Sudan. Did you miss it?You've failed to provide an example of a UN Resolution which provides any ' Binding ' recognition of statehood.
Again - no, Palestine is not a sovereign state recognized by the UN. The Palestine nation fails the sovereignty and effective control requirements to be recognized as a State. I hope that helps.Again- Palestine is a sovereign state recognized by the UN
Correct. Since Palestine does not meet the requirements, the UN Security Council has not, and will not, recognize Palestine as a State.If Palestine did NOT meet the requirements of statehood then the UN would not have recognized it.
I'll trust your crystal ball on this one.There will never be a ' Greater Israel '.
Correct. Only States can be annexed, and Palestine is just a nation.Palestine will never be legally annexed.
You could have just stated this first and dispensed with all the erroneous propaganda.The occupation is illegal. Israel is committing genocide and other war crimes.
Nope, they surrendered to the Ottoman Empire, and surrendered when they lost ww1. And None of them were alive a millenia ago.It's not difficult- it's their home. It's been their home for millennia.
Do you really believe that European Jews are going to be allowed to illegally annex Palestine ?
Israel hasn't ' closed ' its embassy in Ireland- Israel has LOST its embassy in Ireland.
You're right in that Egypt's occupation was not recognized. Neither is Israel'sNope, they surrendered to the Ottoman Empire, and surrendered when they lost ww1. And None of them were alive a millenia ago.
It is Egypt that illegally annexed the Gaza Strip. This is Egypt's mess.
The British Mandate was recognized after ww1 when it was still legal and common to take land by military force, years before the Kellogg pact.You're right in that Egypt's occupation was not recognized. Neither is Israel's
I don't know why people just cannot accept it. Territory can NEVER be gained by force. It's illegal.
Territory can NEVER be gained by force. It's illegal.
Have a good read of the Kellog-Briand Peace Pact before you fuck off for your genocidal Christmas celebrations. It was ' definitively glossed ' at Nuremberg. It's law. Zionism is crime.The British Mandate was recognized after ww1 when it was still legal and common to take land by military force, years before the Kellogg pact.
Clearly, I know more about the Kellogg Pact than you do. I just destroyed your argument!Have a good read of the Kellog-Briand Peace Pact before you fuck off for your genocidal Christmas celebrations. It was ' definitively glossed ' at Nuremberg. It's law. Zionism is crime.
There's a long tradition of Anglo-hatred in Ireland, you mendacious Brit prick- due to it being occupied by British scum . The Irish sympathize with Palestine for precisely that reason.There is a long tradition of anti-Semitism in Ireland, I've never been to understand that to.be honest!
Why do you refer to Hamas as a terror group? What terrorism have they committed?
I realize that Team Israel demands solidarity in declaring Hamas a terrorist organization, but Hamas has no money, no army, and no weapons. Why should any rational adult accept your hyperbole?