Israel to close its embassy in Dublin due to Ireland’s ‘extreme anti-Israel policy’

non-binding, meaningless courtesy recogniztion. There was no Security Council involved so it wasn't anything of any meaning.
Now you are spouting nonsense. ' Non-binding recognition ' ? You are developing troll-like responses.

You also underestimate the power of the UNGA.
 
Now you are spouting nonsense.
Of course it would appear as nonsense to anyone who isn't familiar with how the UN operates.

' Non-binding recognition ' ?
Correct. I'll leave that homework to the student to find out what "non-binding" means, but no member State is bound/obligated to recognize Palestine in any way.

You also underestimate the power of the UNGA.
... but I will never be guilty of overestimating them. Enjoy!
 
Of course it would appear as nonsense to anyone who isn't familiar with how the UN operates.


Correct. I'll leave that homework to the student to find out what "non-binding" means, but no member State is bound/obligated to recognize Palestine in any way.


... but I will never be guilty of overestimating them. Enjoy!
Hey- tell the class what your ' Binding recognition of statehood ' means - and provide an example of a Chapter 7 Security Council resolution.

I shall insist. Fudge will not suffice.
 
Hey- tell the class what your ' Binding recognition of statehood ' means

Class,

A "Binding Recognition of Statehood" is comprised of the following:

Sovereignty: A state must have a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Effective Control: The government seeking recognition must exercise effective control over its territory and population.
International Law: Recognition decisions are often influenced by principles of international law, including respect for territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs.
Political Considerations: Diplomatic recognition can be influenced by political, strategic, and economic interests of the recognizing state.
UN Membership: While the UN itself doesn't grant recognition, membership in the UN can lend legitimacy and encourage other states to recognize a new state.

An example of this was South Sudan's admission in July of 2011.

- and provide an example of a Chapter 7 Security Council resolution.
You just pivoted. This has nothing to do with recognizing Palestine but in punishing Israel. Those are two separate and distinct concepts.

I shall insist. Fudge will not suffice.
You just fudged. Get your requests straight.
 
Class,

A "Binding Recognition of Statehood" is comprised of the following:

Sovereignty: A state must have a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Effective Control: The government seeking recognition must exercise effective control over its territory and population.
International Law: Recognition decisions are often influenced by principles of international law, including respect for territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs.
Political Considerations: Diplomatic recognition can be influenced by political, strategic, and economic interests of the recognizing state.
UN Membership: While the UN itself doesn't grant recognition, membership in the UN can lend legitimacy and encourage other states to recognize a new state.

An example of this was South Sudan's admission in July of 2011.


You just pivoted. This has nothing to do with recognizing Palestine but in punishing Israel. Those are two separate and distinct concepts.


You just fudged. Get your requests straight.
You've failed to provide an example of a UN Resolution which provides any ' Binding ' recognition of statehood. You're a side-stepping fraud. Your claim was nonsense from the outset.
Again- Palestine is a sovereign state recognized by the UN and 146 countries. If Palestine did NOT meet the requirements of statehood then the UN would not have recognized it.
There will never be a ' Greater Israel '. Palestine will never be legally annexed. The occupation is illegal. Israel is committing genocide and other war crimes. There are ICC arrest warrants out for the Zionist leadership.

Your fudging is rejected.
 
You've failed to provide an example of a UN Resolution which provides any ' Binding ' recognition of statehood.
Incorrect, I presented the admission of South Sudan. Did you miss it?

If you'll recall, you are the one who pivoted to a Section 7 requirement which has nothing to do with UN recognition.

You are confused. You stammer demands to gibberish questions. You should read up on the topic a little more before you post.

Again- Palestine is a sovereign state recognized by the UN
Again - no, Palestine is not a sovereign state recognized by the UN. The Palestine nation fails the sovereignty and effective control requirements to be recognized as a State. I hope that helps.

If Palestine did NOT meet the requirements of statehood then the UN would not have recognized it.
Correct. Since Palestine does not meet the requirements, the UN Security Council has not, and will not, recognize Palestine as a State.

There will never be a ' Greater Israel '.
I'll trust your crystal ball on this one.

Palestine will never be legally annexed.
Correct. Only States can be annexed, and Palestine is just a nation.

The occupation is illegal. Israel is committing genocide and other war crimes.
You could have just stated this first and dispensed with all the erroneous propaganda.
 
Fudge ^

I'm pleased that the truth regarding Palestinian statehood has caused you to fudge so enthusiastically.
Your problem with attempting to disguise fudge as fact is that fudge has such a distinctive aroma.

Again, Palestine is a UN - recognized state. The Palestinian flag flies at the UN alongside all other states, despite your further , boring, denials.



Although the United States of AIPAC are able to block full Palestinian membership at the Security Council by way of the veto, that veto may be overridden by the General Assembly for the purposes of the prevention of war. I tell you this for free as I will enjoy your forthcoming fudge regarding your belief that any SC veto is all-powerful. Pride comes before a fall.
 
Further, with regard to your claim that Palestine is not a state because it does not meet the requirements of statehood.
I found this for you. Feel free to print it out and use it as your fudge wrapper.


fudge.jpg




Let's see if you're a masochist. Several other deluded prosemitic members here are you know.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top