It appears the unredacted Mueller report is enough to put tRump up sh!t creek

gemini104104 said:
According to hidden details of the Mueller report that were feloniously obstructed by the pig Barr in particular, it appears the unobstructed and complete report is enough to send tRump and his entire regime to America's best gulag. This appears to be one reason why the fake president and criminal against humanity tRump is desperately urging his flunkies to shield him from Justice.

Mueller Report is 'Sufficient to Obtain a Guilty Verdict' on Donald Trump, Law Professor Tells Congress

Former U.S. attorney Joyce White Vance told Congress on Monday that former special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation should be enough to "obtain a guilty verdict" on President Donald Trump.
Vance testified before the House Judiciary Committee along with several other legal experts, including Watergate figure John Dean, on the lessons from Mueller's highly-contested report. In her remarks, Vance said that Trump would have been charged with a crime if he was not president of the United States.
"Based on my years of experience as a prosecutor, if I was assessing that evidence as to a person other than a sitting president... the facts in that report would be sufficient to prove all of the elements necessary to charge multiple counts of obstruction of justice," Vance said. She added that the evidence is "not equivocal" and that the decision to charge Trump would not even be a "close-call."
https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-re...Y0hlQ_FKYDH_smvxPnDVH3g_644EquQsjaNoNBIM2kY7M
Click to expand...

"Appears"....:rofl2:
 
gemini104104 said:
According to hidden details of the Mueller report that were feloniously obstructed by the pig Barr in particular, it appears the unobstructed and complete report is enough to send tRump and his entire regime to America's best gulag. This appears to be one reason why the fake president and criminal against humanity tRump is desperately urging his flunkies to shield him from Justice.

Mueller Report is 'Sufficient to Obtain a Guilty Verdict' on Donald Trump, Law Professor Tells Congress

Former U.S. attorney Joyce White Vance told Congress on Monday that former special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation should be enough to "obtain a guilty verdict" on President Donald Trump.
Vance testified before the House Judiciary Committee along with several other legal experts, including Watergate figure John Dean, on the lessons from Mueller's highly-contested report. In her remarks, Vance said that Trump would have been charged with a crime if he was not president of the United States.
"Based on my years of experience as a prosecutor, if I was assessing that evidence as to a person other than a sitting president... the facts in that report would be sufficient to prove all of the elements necessary to charge multiple counts of obstruction of justice," Vance said. She added that the evidence is "not equivocal" and that the decision to charge Trump would not even be a "close-call."
https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-re...Y0hlQ_FKYDH_smvxPnDVH3g_644EquQsjaNoNBIM2kY7M
Click to expand...

What's the crime & what's the hold up bringing his orange ass to justice? My excited mind needs to know!
 
RB 60 said:
Apparently the "special prosecutor" couldn't find anything to indict Trump on. What makes you think these other 1000 idiots could?
Click to expand...

Muellers function was to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. He found it. He was also charged with checking out related crimes he encountered. He was not after Trump. He said he did not follow up on Trump because he operated under the impression that a sitting president cannot be indicted. However, he listed several clear examples of Trump obstruction which should be followed up on. That is what the House is doing.
Have you read anything on the report?
 
Robo said:
What's the crime & what's the hold up bringing his orange ass to justice? My excited mind needs to know!
Click to expand...

Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Can you understand obstruction and that 1000 prosecutors say that is easy to prove.
 
Gonzomin said:
Muellers function was to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. He found it. He was also charged with checking out related crimes he encountered. He was not after Trump. He said he did not follow up on Trump because he operated under the impression that a sitting president cannot be indicted. However, he listed several clear examples of Trump obstruction which should be followed up on. That is what the House is doing.
Have you read anything on the report?
Click to expand...

The house is continuing the witch hunt because the report didn't specify anything to indict. They are a bunch of assholes who are, like you, pissing and moaning because Hillary lost. I can't wait until they/you lose in 2020.
 
RB 60 said:
Apparently the "special prosecutor" couldn't find anything to indict Trump on. What makes you think these other 1000 idiots could?
Click to expand...

“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
 
RB 60 said:
The house is continuing the witch hunt because the report didn't specify anything to indict. They are a bunch of assholes who are, like you, pissing and moaning because Hillary lost. I can't wait until they/you lose in 2020.
Click to expand...

“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
 
domer76 said:
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
Click to expand...

The report was to be given to the AG to determine if charges were warranted. None were.
 
domer76 said:
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”
Click to expand...

Then why was a special counsel appointed to look into it, and why did he spend 2 1/2 years on it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top