It's High, Long Overdue Time To Take This PC Single Mother Myth To The Wood Shed.

christiefan915 said:
I know you're not anti-woman but I think the OP is. And I think it would be better to focus on addressing societal problems as a whole rather than blame its ills on single moms, as Quayle seemed to do.
Click to expand...

The OP isn't anti-woman you dunce; it is about personal responsibility and the lack of it contained in leftist progressive efforts to elevate loserdom to entitliement class.

It is about irresponsible women and men who have followed the societal message that one can do whatever one feels like without suffering the consequences and Government led by benevolent well meaning Liberals will ensure that someone else will be forced to pay for it as long as you vote for Liberal Progressives and become a ward of the State. It is an immoral cultural decline that is a testimony to the failed big Government Liberal Progressive ideology.

I can't say I am surprised that dunces who follow the ideology of losers for the losers and by the losers wouldn't get it. It's the same dullard PC group think that believes that by giving every child a trophy for participating in a sport, it will enhance their self esteem. All it does it does is breed mediocrity and failure.
 
cawacko said:
He's written before that men need to step up and take responsibility for their children. And he has argued that black men who become successful need to stay in the communities to be role models and positive examples to others. He's not blaming women. His call is to get (black) men to get more involved in the lives of their children and children in the community.

I was posted this because I think all children need a father figure in their life. That's not anti-woman to say that. That's not putting down a woman who raises a child by herself.

I do not disagree with the notion that it is much more acceptable today in society for people to have children out of wedlock. From a freedom perspective that would be a good thing. From a child's perspective and a societal perspective I'd argue its not.
Click to expand...

And you seem to argue from a position of absolute ignorance. A culture that disrespects and condemns single mothers because it is not acceptable, is not going to help her children or society. There is no shortage of idiot males that think a fatherless boy needs to be yelled at, disciplined and/or physically abused more. That's an ignorant position based on a lack of information.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
And you seem to argue from a position of absolute ignorance. A culture that disrespects and condemns single mothers because it is not acceptable, is not going to help her children or society. There is no shortage of idiot males that think a fatherless boy needs to be yelled at, disciplined and/or physically abused more. That's an ignorant position based on a lack of information.
Click to expand...

You are clearly on crack.
 
super duper has never proven correct on any of his predictions on the outcome of policy.

hes been here for close to a decade and has never predicted something correctly
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
You are lumped in with them because you refuse to challenge them and only attack me or Democrats. [/quote

I am defending my position which you have yet to even address. All you have done is level personal attacks against me for criticizing your klan buddies.
Click to expand...

Wow, you are a completely dishonest piece of shit these days. I continue to tell you I have those idiots on IA, yet you somehow pretend I must 'challenge them' or else it means I agree with them? Do you see how fucking retarded that line of thought of yours is?

I questioned you for dismissing the guys post based on an ASSUMPTION on your part. You based your ASSUMPTION on nothing. You have no clue what that mans knowledge is on the subject, yet you pretended you did. Because, as I stated many times, his comment doesn't fit the narrative you want to tell.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Be specific, coward. What did I assume? You have nothing but generalities, vague and baseless assertions.

His stated basis is insufficient to draw the conclusions he made.
Click to expand...

I already stated it you coward. You are a little piece of shit aren't ya? Is that why you keep trying to go internet warrior on the board?
 
cawacko said:
Now this isn't related to crime but it speaks to effect of single motherhood on young men. This is from my buddy who is a coach and mentor in Oakland.

""A mother of a player told me I shouldn't raise my voice at her son he does not respond well to it. I said all I said was get back on defense and get your hands up. She said it was the way you said it. Then it hit me, many of these kids have no father in the home and never hear a man's voice giving a man's command. This is why we need community coaches because just hearing a man's command voice could change a child's life. The little things are really big!- Shawn G.""
Click to expand...

Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Who cares. The guy is making faulty assumptions based on very limited information.
Click to expand...

Again moron... you proclaim the guy is making assumptions on very limited information.

Now tell us... HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT INFORMATION HE BASED IT OFF OF? YOU DON'T KNOW THE MAN. THUS YOU ARE ASSUMING WHAT IT IS HE KNOWS.

Is that clear enough for you little boy?
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
And you seem to argue from a position of absolute ignorance. A culture that disrespects and condemns single mothers because it is not acceptable, is not going to help her children or society. There is no shortage of idiot males that think a fatherless boy needs to be yelled at, disciplined and/or physically abused more. That's an ignorant position based on a lack of information.
Click to expand...

Really? It's ignorant to suggest it's better for a child to have a mother and father? There are always going to be idiot fathers unfortunately. But that doesn't change that overall children benefit from having a father figure in their life. Like I said, I don't know your background but I might surmise you enjoy "white privilege" if you think stating the importance of a father is ignorant.

(And to reiterate this is not knocking women or the role they play)
 
Superfreak said:
Except I did provide the example. Even bolded it so that even a simpleton like you wouldn't likely miss it. Apparently you are not bright enough to see it.
Click to expand...


You did not, dummy. You "bolded" the statement "based on limited information." YOU ARE ASSUMING that he failed to disclose what information he had in making his case. I see no reason to assume that.

You are a pos who does nothing but provide cover for racist scum. Fuck off, coward.
 
cawacko said:
Now this isn't related to crime but it speaks to effect of single motherhood on young men. This is from my buddy who is a coach and mentor in Oakland.

""A mother of a player told me I shouldn't raise my voice at her son he does not respond well to it. I said all I said was get back on defense and get your hands up. She said it was the way you said it. Then it hit me, many of these kids have no father in the home and never hear a man's voice giving a man's command. This is why we need community coaches because just hearing a man's command voice could change a child's life. The little things are really big!- Shawn G.""
Click to expand...

Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Who cares. The guy is making faulty assumptions based on very limited information.
Click to expand...

Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Fuck off, coward.
Click to expand...

whats the matter little boy... are ya mad that I made a fool of you yesterday? Now you come on today with more of your nonsense and you expect people to just let you slide?

Your comments were that of a nutter. You are just like Desh... spouting nonsense and then pretending you are adding value to the discussion. You are not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top