T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Where did this happen?
When you set absolute rules in the interest of total safety or zero pollution THAT is oppression.
Levels of government have a hierarchy. That is necessary to avoid anarchy.
I've noticed a trend in terminology
- Thread starter T. A. Gardner
- Start date
Where did this happen?
When you set absolute rules in the interest of total safety or zero pollution THAT is oppression.
Floriduh and a couple of other places.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And government did that?
Into the Night
Contributor
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Argument from randU fallacies. Denial of Ohm's law. Denial of daily cycle.
Completely true. Solar power produces NOTHING during nighttime. There is no such thing as 'grid engineering terms'. Solar power is unreliable. It won't work when it's covered in snow, damaged by wind and dust, poorly maintained (such as a typical roof mounted system), or damaged by critters. The panels are expensive and easily damaged. It can only exist due to heavy subsidies from the government.
Lie. Denial.
Lie. Denial.
Fossils aren't used as fuel. Fossils don't burn. There are no subsidies for using fossils for fuel. There are no power plants using fossils for fuel.
Lie. Denial. Abandoned and/or damaged panels are nothing but E-waste, Zombie.
There is no recycling of solar panels, Zombie. Panels don't last 25-35 years.
There is no such thing as an oil/gas waste stream. Burning oil or gasoline or methane produces carbon dioxide and water. A single coal power plant can produce more energy than ALL of the wind farms and solar farms in a State.
Fossils aren't waste. They are are neither used nor are waste from power plants.
Last edited:
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
You keep chanting the same four lines like a Roomba stuck under a couch and calling it logic. Solar not working at night isn’t a revelation, it’s literally in the name. What is a revelation is watching you deny the existence of grid engineering like it’s Bigfoot.
Panels aren’t easily damaged, your arguments are. Every claim you make collapses under the slightest contact with reality, which is probably why you keep hiding behind buzzwords you don’t understand.
If repeating inversion fallacy was a power source, you’d finally contribute something to the grid.
Into the Night
Contributor
Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.
Go learn what a scrapbook is, Zombie.
They are all history. They are also part of your posting history. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
You deny physics. You deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
You can't blame your fallacies on me or anybody else, Zombie.
Random words ignored.
I do not own science. You simply want to discard it. You discard the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.
Buzzword fallacy (reality). Assumption of victory fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (religion<->science).
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Solar doesn't work in the context of a larger grid system that has to supply electricity 24/7. Wind is a bit better, but both being intermittent is the issue. The operative value for determining the LCOE isn't the kwh like is normally used, but rather the kilowatt-day. When you use the latter, solar is ungodly expensive and wind, while it does better, is still expensive.
Into the Night
Contributor
Denial of logic. You cannot blame your fallacies on anybody else, Zombie.
Apparently it is for you!
There is no such thing as 'grid engineering term'. Redefinition fallacy (grid<->bigfoot).
Panels are easily damaged, Zombie. Hail, snow, rain, sand, wind, critters, moss and other vegetation, and even sunlight damage solar panels.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy (reality).
Inversion fallacy.
Inversion fallacy.
Yes, they are the ones who make laws.
You tRumplings really need to take at least one "American government" course before you come in here and make fools of yourselves.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
Behavior Analysis: Intothenight in This Exchange
1. Immediate Pattern: Reflexive Reversal
- “Go learn what X means, Zombie.”
- “You deny physics.”
- “Buzzword fallacy.”
- “Random words ignored.”
- “Disclaimer: Leftists…”
This is the inversion loop I already exposed.
2. Zero Engagement With Claims
I made specific, structured points:- scrapbook of wish‑fulfillment
- contradictions with physics
- contradictions with national reality
- fallacy‑spam
- bumper‑sticker analysis
- science denial
- “Go learn what a scrapbook is.”
- “You deny physics.”
- “Random words ignored.”
- “Buzzword fallacy.”
He replaces the argument with:
- definitions
- accusations
- fallacy names
- disclaimers
- projection
3. Fallacy‑Name Tourette’s
He fires off fallacy names like a malfunctioning label maker:- Buzzword fallacy
- Assumption of victory fallacy
- Redefinition fallacy
- Argument of the Stone
- Inversion fallacy
This is fallacy‑spam behavior — using terminology as a shield, not a tool.
4. Physics Denial + Projection
He claims I “deny physics,” then immediately denies:- greenhouse effect
- radiative forcing
- atmospheric warming
- basic thermodynamics as applied in climate science
5. The “Random Words Ignored” Tell
This line is a classic JPP defensive tic.It means:
“I can’t rebut this, so I’ll pretend it’s meaningless.”
It’s the rhetorical equivalent of covering your ears.
6. The “Disclaimer: Leftists…” Pattern
This is his fallback when cornered:- shift to identity
- shift to ideology
- shift to tribal framing
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And lately, Democrat run local and state governments ignore federal law when they find it convenient.
Into the Night
Contributor
Mantra 1d.
You are not making an argument, Zombie. Whining is not an argument. Buzzword fallacies (reflexive inversion). Inversion fallacy.
Inversion fallacy.
Inversion fallacy.
You do deny physics.
You are denying the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
There is no such thing as 'greenhouse effect'. No gas or vapor can create energy out of nothing. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.
No such thing. Buzzword fallacy.
You can't create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
Climate is not a branch of science. You are ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.
Inversion fallacy.
Go learn English. Your random words are not even English.
Assumption of victory fallacy. Denial of self. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
Into the Night
Contributor
They have for many decades, to wit:
* Attempting to ban or limit guns, in violation of the Constitution of the United States and most State constitutions.
* Hiding and attempting to justify fraud.
* Aiding and abetting federal crime.
* Illegal immigrant 'sanctuary cities and states', in violation of federal law.
* Prohibiting federal officers, in violation of federal law.
* Election fraud, in violation of federal law and even their own state laws.
* Taxation by religion, such as carbon taxes imposed by the Church of Global Warming, in violation of federal law.
* Tax The Rich schemes, in violation of the Constitution of the United States.
* Murder and assassinations, including Abraham Lincoln, Charlie Kirk, bystanders on the street, attempts against Trump, and many others.
* Trespass, breaking and entering, and theft of personal property at Mar-a-Lago.
* Election fraud.
* Treason.
Into the Night
Contributor
You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else, Zombie.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
An accurate statement.
Sanctuary cities and states defy US immigration law
Refusal to allow local and state law enforcement to interact with federal law enforcement
Withholding payment to the federal government in various forms
That's for starters.
serendipity
Verified User
Stacey Abrams ffs, wtf!!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
AOC slams ‘oppressed’ Trump states while touting NYC services despite $5B deficit and transit crime spike
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., claimed red states were "oppressed" compared to New York City, praising its public transit, teachers and sanitation workers.
www.foxnews.com
Texas Democrat blasted for telling Latino, Black, Asian people to unite against 'oppressor,' 'take over’ US
Texas state Rep. Gene Wu faced condemnation from fellow politicians over a resurfaced podcast clip showing him telling Latino, Black, Asian communities to "take over" the country.
www.foxnews.com
Tell that to your MAGA comrades, don’t know how many times I’ve heard them say black districts were racist
Tennessee took the City of Memphis, an urban area 65% black, and divided it into three separate district dominated by a white rural populace who heavily favors Republicans. Memphis lost their Congressional representative who identified with their interests and views. Not the intent of democracy