Ivermectin APPEARS TO BE WORKING WONDERS

[Into the Night]

He can't. We've seen the best of #10

Meanwhile, there's this

What? A meme based on a randU fallacy?

Big hairy deal.

 

[Into the Night]

He attends the University of Facebook. More prestigious that all the epidemiologists, virologists and doctors in the world.

You don't get to speak for anyone but yourself, dude. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Aha! No doubt he's earned his doctorate in Medical uses of Bleach, Best liquor to serve with Horse Pills and UV enemas.

Trolling, sock.

 

[Into the Night]

I still cannot wrap my head around the idea that one would prefer to contract a potentially lethal disease and treat it with dewormer than to prevent it in the first place.

But, let them forge on. It’s better to have them out of the genetic pool and voting booth.

Trolling. Hate speech.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, stop trying to rationalize irrational behavior. You'll end up a clueless QAnon nutjob rubbing bleach on his genitals and using a Blacklight as a suppository.

Trolling, sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Agreed. Too many fucking morons denying science yet absolutely believing in Facebook Folk Medicine. WTFO?

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again, sock.

 

[Into the Night]

I read a study on Ivermectin a few days ago. it sid it would have to be used in quantities that are toxic to be useful. They did not recommend using it.

So? I bet your 'study' is just an empty opinion. It certainly isn't science.

 

[domer76]

Into The Night = idiot = ignore

 

[Trumpet]

Into The Night = idiot = ignore

Into The Night=shithead.

 

[domer76]

Into The Night-shithead.

That, too. And his sock, gfm

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Trolling, sock.

That, too. And his sock, gfm

Agreed. Also IBDaMann. All three of them are on Sybil's fake forum. Click the link to his signature. It's like opening his head and looking inside.

 

[Into the Night]

Into The Night = idiot = ignore

 

[Into the Night]

That, too. And his sock, gfm

GFM is not me, sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Trolling, sock.



Agreed. Also IBDaMann. All three of them are on Sybil's fake forum. Click the link to his signature. It's like opening his head and looking inside.

Agreeing with yourself, sock? Inversion fallacies. Stop faking posts.

 

[domer76]

The idiot can’t even figure out what ignore means.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You're trolling again, Sybil.

The idiot can’t even figure out what ignore means.

He's a hoot, ain't he? Do you think he's really allowed to run around loose in his neighborhood without adult supervision?

 

[Nordberg]

So? I bet your 'study' is just an empty opinion. It certainly isn't science.

Empty is how your opinions should be described. I seek actual medical opinions. You do not need them. You make them up as you go along.

 

[domer76]

You're trolling again, Sybil.


He's a hoot, ain't he? Do you think he's really allowed to run around loose in his neighborhood without adult supervision?

The ignorant fucker knows he’s on ignore, yet still continues to reply, ad nauseam, to my posts. That’s pegging out the Stupid Meter.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The ignorant fucker knows he’s on ignore, yet still continues to reply, ad nauseam, to my posts. That’s pegging out the Stupid Meter.

He replies regardless of the names. He doesn't keep track of who bans him and who doesn't. He's in his own little world....and that's why I like to rock it for him every once in away when he replies like a fucking moron to me with his idiot posts.

 

[Flash]

Okay. Show me where in any constitution of any State:

Here is the Texas law: "Sec. 38.001. IMMUNIZATION; REQUIREMENTS; EXCEPTIONS. (a) Each student shall be fully immunized against diphtheria, rubeola, rubella, mumps, tetanus, and poliomyelitis, except as provided by Subsection (c).

This is the entire law except for a list of exemptions and what is required to qualify for an exemption.

Here is the Texas court case upholding the constitutionality of Texas vaccine requirements:

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2456039/itz-v-penick/?

Here is the constitutional justification for such laws:

"The police power inherent in the state has been likened unto the law of self-defense, that is said to be born in each individual. As the individual has the right to protect his life or body from serious bodily injury, and his property which he has lawfully acquired from destruction, so the state has the inherent right, under the police power, to protect the public welfare from those things which would produce death or seriously affect the health of the public or its general moral welfare."

Do you think Abbot's executive orders saying school districts and private businesses cannot require masks or vaccines is constitutional? What is the source of his authority? It is restricting the power of local governments and interfering in private businesses.