Into the Night
Verified User
Batshit Crazy Inversion. pretending states are not states because you say so. cuckoo. cuckoo. Paging Dr. Freud!!
I don't pretend like you do.
Batshit Crazy Inversion. pretending states are not states because you say so. cuckoo. cuckoo. Paging Dr. Freud!!
Anyone who refers to and immediately dismisses ivermectin as "horse worm meds" is a person who has outsourced his/her thinking to manipulative liars.
Not furtiveness. Apparently you don't know what the word means.
The Democrats seized power in a silent coup, through the use of an election fault caused by Democrats through election fraud. Before you go there again, yes, the evidence is still there and hasn't gone away, and some of it has already been shown to you.
Neither the former States of California nor New York recognize their constitutions either. They are also oligarchies.
That is absolutely not true. The Repubs challenged the election in a myriad of ways. They all failed. Do you know that much? They had the power and came to the conclusion that Trump lost. The problem is your inability to process information when it conflicts with your poorly thought-out preconceptions. The election is not problematic. You are.
You can't make the evidence go away by wishing, dude.
You can't make the evidence go away by wishing, dude.
Anyone who refers to and immediately dismisses ivermectin as "horse worm meds" is a person who has outsourced his/her thinking to manipulative liars.
I consider that to be an insult to 3 year olds everywhere......OR, someone who has the IQ of a 3 year old.
If a State has effectively disregarded their constitution and replaced it with an oligarchy, are they still a State?? The answer should be obvious.You fail to see the furtiveness because you believe all the crazy shit like there are only 48 states, there is no Union, etc.
What did I misquote?
If a State has effectively disregarded their constitution and replaced it with an oligarchy, are they still a State?? The answer should be obvious.
It is very clear that California and New York no longer govern under any constitutional bounds, as States do. They are no longer States... Who will be next to relinquish their Statehood??
I've already shown it to you numerous times. RQAA.When are we going to see this evidence?
RQAA.Why are they keeping it secret?
Not about what Trump has claimed. RQAA.The stuff Trump has claimed as fraud is easily proven false.
Turns out neither GA nor AZ chose any electors at all.Into the Night:
“Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing.”
This is correct. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.[FONT=&]
“Only religions use supporting evidence. Science doesn't.”[/FONT]
It doesn't.[FONT=&]“The phrase “freedom of speech” does not appear in the Constitution”[/FONT]
This is also correct.[FONT=&]There are currently only 48 States. Neither the SOTC nor the SOTNY are States anymore. They do not honor their own State constitutions anymore.
There is no Union anymore either. The United States fell when the Democrats seized control of the federal government in a silent coup, discarded the Constitution of the United States, and converted it into an oligarchy. How long this will last remains unknown.[/FONT]
There is zero evidence as trumpys proved in every state they claimed had a flawed election. Again, you are the problem. You are immune to facts. Does we have a vaccine for that?
If a State has effectively disregarded their constitution and replaced it with an oligarchy, are they still a State?? The answer should be obvious.
It is very clear that California and New York no longer govern under any constitutional bounds, as States do. They are no longer States... Who will be next to relinquish their Statehood??
Yes it does.That does not mean they are not states.
WRONG. No court has authority over any constitution.Under our Constitutions states are sovereign and their courts and political institutions decide whether they have violated their state constitutions.
Actually, it is.It is not for people from other states to determine if a state acted unconstitutionally
Apparently you can't see your hand in front of your face. You are the last person to quote anything about any constitution. You have no idea even the purpose of a constitution, and you have not read any of them.when they have little or no knowledge of the law in those states (or, even if they do).
If a State government no longer recognizes it's own constitution, that government is no longer legitimate as a State.Disagreeing with the acts of a state if a far cry from claiming it is no longer a state.
Void argument fallacy.Texas has taken action that clearly violates the U. S. Constitution
Void argument fallacy. Rights do not come from constitutions. Again, you have no idea what a constitution is for or what it does.and could endanger all the constitutional rights in that state,
Loaded question. Irrelevant.does that mean Texas is no longer a state?
I've already shown it to you numerous times.
$100 for showing me one post where you provided me any evidence.
RQAA. You wouldn't pay it anyway, welcher.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/10/why_is_the_medical_profession_letting_us_die.htmlWhy is the medical profession letting us die?
.
.
.
Medical professionals are permitted to prescribe drugs as they see fit, even for off-label use. They do this hoping the drugs will be effective in treating their patients and improving their conditions and lives. Prescribing a drug or regimen that does not have specific FDA approval for a specific use is perfectly legal and done all the time. The media, the CDC, and Dr. Fauci seem to have conflated FDA approval with the only legal means whereby drugs can be prescribed. This is simply wrong.
So, why are health care providers not throwing the kitchen sink at this disease? Easily answered with another question: Why are politicians setting themselves up as the chief medical officers of their jurisdictions? Looks as if the Obamacare mentality of "we know what's medically best for all of you" has evolved. Now, not only can't you pick your doctor, but your doctor can no longer provide simple, effective, and low-cost treatments for a super-powerful common cold.
By withholding potentially effective treatments, medical professionals are letting us die. By threatening the livelihoods of medical professionals should they try everything for their patients, the politicians and policymakers are killing us. They could stop this pandemic in its tracks if they would simply get out of the way and let the medical professionals do their work. They paid dearly to acquire their expertise. Let's let them exercise it, for the sake of all of us.
.
.
.
I just looked through a list of the remaining States and I think you're probably right about that. Oregon seems to be the closest to joining the likes of the SOTC and the SOTNY. Kate Brown is truly something special, and not in a good way. I would throw up in my mouth a bit if I ever had to drive along I-5 and witness all of those shithole cities along there...Probably Oregon. That's my bet.
Yes it does.That does not mean they are not states.
Courts and political institutions have no authority over any constitution.Under our Constitutions states are sovereign and their courts and political institutions decide whether they have violated their state constitutions.
Yes it is.It is not for people from other states to determine if a state acted unconstitutionally when they have little or no knowledge of the law in those states (or, even if they do).
As ITN told you, if a State government is no longer recognizing its own constitution, then that government is no longer legitimate as a State. There really isn't any better way to phrase it.Disagreeing with the acts of a state if a far cry from claiming it is no longer a state.
What "action" are you referring to? Rights are not granted by constitutions. Texas is a State, as its government recognizes its constitution and the US constitution.Texas has taken action that clearly violates the U. S. Constitution and could endanger all the constitutional rights in that state, does that mean Texas is no longer a state?
This is what you do when evidence is presented to you.I would gladly pay it but I know you can't provide any evidence and never have. You have never provided any evidence or support for any of your posts--only claims which are usually opposite the established truth.