Ivermectin APPEARS TO BE WORKING WONDERS

You did not. Mandates are NOT required to attend school, even in Texas.

No State requires vaccinations to attend school.

No, they are not mandated.

Nope, wrong again.

You are obviously not familiar with school requirements. Most (all?) require vaccinations including Texas. They allow exemptions for various reasons, but most students do not seek exemptions and get the vaccinations.

If something is an established fact Into the Night is going to claim it is not true.
 
:fap:




Your issues, not mine.

Your issue is your claim that N95 masks can block 95% of .3 micron but can't block anything smaller because the openings are too large to block anything smaller. This leads to some interesting conclusions that I have to ask you about. Please provide your answers.

Are you arguing that only 95% of the openings in an N95 mask are less than .3 micron in size? Why not simply make 100% of them that size to turn it into a 100% mask?

If N95 masks stop particles based solely on size of openings then why do N95 masks require 3 layers? Shouldn't one layer with .29 micron holes stop 100% of .3 micron particles?

Your issue is that your argument fails miserably since you can't answer the questions I just asked without destroying your entire claim.
 
Your issue is your claim that N95 masks can block 95% of .3 micron but can't block anything smaller because the openings are too large to block anything smaller. This leads to some interesting conclusions that I have to ask you about. Please provide your answers.

Are you arguing that only 95% of the openings in an N95 mask are less than .3 micron in size? Why not simply make 100% of them that size to turn it into a 100% mask?

If N95 masks stop particles based solely on size of openings then why do N95 masks require 3 layers? Shouldn't one layer with .29 micron holes stop 100% of .3 micron particles?

Your issue is that your argument fails miserably since you can't answer the questions I just asked without destroying your entire claim.

your meth is causing you to be delusional. stop being a drug infested moron and learn how to use a search engine. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
 
...correcting formatting...


Unit error. Denial of the N95 specification. Buzzword fallacy (viral load). There is nothing special about a surgical mask other than a treatment with a biocide. Such masks effectively revert to N95 masks after a couple of hours. They also do not stop a virus. You are also not wearing a surgical mask. Did you know you can be infected by a SINGLE VIRUS?


your comments continue to be the stupidest most pointless comments ever made on the internet at any time ever. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
 
Nope, wrong again.

You are obviously not familiar with school requirements. Most (all?) require vaccinations including Texas. They allow exemptions for various reasons, but most students do not seek exemptions and get the vaccinations.

If something is an established fact Into the Night is going to claim it is not true.

Schools that require Vaccinations. https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/list-of-colleges-that-require-covid-19-vaccine/ ITN just says anything without doing a lick of homework. When caught badly enough, he switches to his sock.
 
Your issue is your claim that N95 masks can block 95% of .3 micron but can't block anything smaller because the openings are too large to block anything smaller. This leads to some interesting conclusions that I have to ask you about. Please provide your answers.
Since your conclusions are inane, there are no answers for you. There is nothing more that gfm has to say, except to also remind you that you are denying the N95 spec.
Are you arguing that only 95% of the openings in an N95 mask are less than .3 micron in size? Why not simply make 100% of them that size to turn it into a 100% mask?
Not what N95 means.
If N95 masks stop particles based solely on size of openings then why do N95 masks require 3 layers? Shouldn't one layer with .29 micron holes stop 100% of .3 micron particles?
Not what N95 means.
Your issue is that your argument fails miserably since you can't answer the questions I just asked without destroying your entire claim.
Nah. Your conclusions are simply inane.

You are also still stuck in Paradox M. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational, sock.
 
Since your conclusions are inane, there are no answers for you. There is nothing more that gfm has to say, except to also remind you that you are denying the N95 spec.
I have not denied any spec of the N95. You have not provided any spec for me to deny. Since I haven't denied any spec and you haven't provide any your argument is a fallacy.

Not what N95 means.
Since I didn't say that is what N95 means, your argument is merely a fallacy.
Not what N95 means.
Since I didn't say that is what N95 means, your argument is merely a fallacy.
Nah. Your conclusions are simply inane.
Hmm.... I wonder which fallacy that is.

You are also still stuck in Paradox M. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational, sock.
Since you haven't defined what the paradox is your statement is simply another fallacy. Socks are what I wear on my feet. What you do with socks is pretty apparent to many posters here.
 
I have not denied any spec of the N95.
Yes you have.
You have not provided any spec for me to deny.
I don't need to. Anyone can read the spec for themselves.
Since I haven't denied any spec and you haven't provide any your argument is a fallacy.
Void argument fallacy.
Since I didn't say that is what N95 means, your argument is merely a fallacy.
You did. Lie.
Since I didn't say that is what N95 means, your argument is merely a fallacy.
You did. Lie.
Hmm.... I wonder which fallacy that is.
A lie is a fallacy in and of itself.
Since you haven't defined what the paradox is your statement is simply another fallacy.
I have. RQAA. Argument of the stone fallacy.
Socks are what I wear on my feet.
And what you use here, sock.
What you do with socks is pretty apparent to many posters here.
You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
 
Yes you have.

I don't need to. Anyone can read the spec for themselves.

Void argument fallacy.
Separating the argument doesn't make the argument no longer exist. Your claim of a void argument fallacy is an example of the fallacy fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy.

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, usually Into the Night, simply declares another poster is using fallacies and fails to point out how the supposed fallacies are actually fallacies. The fallacy fallacy is usually used by someone trying to avoid discussing the topic because they are unable to so they try to appear more intelligent than they are by simply claiming a fallacy.
You did. Lie.

You did. Lie
And yet you can provide no evidence to support your claim I lied. You are like a 6 year old on the playground.
A lie is a fallacy in and of itself.
Failure to provide support for your claims points to a failure to be able to make a reasoned argument. This explains why you resort to the fallacy fallacy so often since the fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, usually Into the Night, simply declares another poster is using fallacies and fails to point out how the supposed fallacies are actually fallacies. The fallacy fallacy is usually used by someone trying to avoid discussing the topic because they are unable to so they try to appear more intelligent than they are by simply claiming a fallacy.

I have. RQAA. Argument of the stone fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy.

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, usually Into the Night, simply declares another poster is using fallacies and fails to point out how the supposed fallacies are actually fallacies. The fallacy fallacy is usually used by someone trying to avoid discussing the topic because they are unable to so they try to appear more intelligent than they are by simply claiming a fallacy.

And what you use here, sock.
Failure to provide evidence to support your claim. I wonder if that makes this an inversion fallacy on your part. Perhaps it does since you have been accused by many of having various other identities you use here.

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy.

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster, usually Into the Night, simply declares another poster is using fallacies and fails to point out how the supposed fallacies are actually fallacies. The fallacy fallacy is usually used by someone trying to avoid discussing the topic because they are unable to so they try to appear more intelligent than they are by simply claiming a fallacy.
 
Anyone who refers to and immediately dismisses ivermectin as "horse worm meds" is a person who has outsourced his/her thinking to manipulative liars.

Now, let's do a "deep dive" into the data being presented to us:

Take a look at the COVID case numbers in certain parts of India, specifically Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. You will first notice that both of them had a huge upward spike in COVID cases starting at the beginning of April of this year and continuing to spike until the end of April. You will then notice that both of them had a huge corresponding DOWNWARD SLIDE from the beginning of May until the end of May. You will then notice that both of them, since the beginning of June (and through today) have been all but "COVID-free" (very few isolated cases) and have effectively "flat lined" near zero with regard to COVID cases.

Now let's take a look at case numbers in another part of India called Kerala. All the way up until the beginning of April, their numbers were quite similar to Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. Through the month of April, they experienced the same upward spike in cases that Uttar Pradesh and Delhi did. During May, their numbers came down similarly to Uttar Pradesh and Delhi (but not a corresponding decrease, meaning that it was not as sharp of a decrease as the increase was). Then in June through today, the cases in Kerala did not effectively reach zero (near zero) like Uttar Pradesh and Delhi did, but they instead increased for months before now coming back down to where they were at the lowest part of the decrease, but are still nowhere near as low as Uttar Pradesh and Delhi are.

The former USA, in comparison, is different from all of them in regard that the increases and decreases are much wider-spread instead of squished in (meaning that it takes much longer for cases to increase and decrease). The former USA's chart is most similar to Kerala's chart though.

Before summarizing the differences in approach, let me first list out the populations of each area and then compare some data such as the seven day moving averages of "peak cases" and "current cases", ivermectin usage, and then compare India's vaccination rates to the former USA's vaccination rates:

DELHI: ~30 million
(~25k cases at end of April peak, ~30 cases at end of September)
(widespread usage of ivermectin, not as aggressively as Uttar Pradesh though)
Cases have been under 1,000 since the beginning of June and under 100 since early-July.

KERALA: ~35 million
(~38k cases at mid-May peak, ~15k cases at end of September)
(Initially had restricted ivermectin usage as a late treatment, then stopped ivermectin usage at beginning of August)
Cases have never been under ~11k, let alone under 1,000 or under 100.

UTTAR PRADESH: ~240 million
(~35k cases at end of April peak, ~15 cases at end of September)
(widespread prophylactic and therapeutic usage of ivermectin)
Cases have been under 1,000 since a bit into June and under 100 since mid-July.

FORMER USA: ~330 million
(~254k cases at early-January peak, ~13k cases at early-June, ~110k cases at end of September)
(Government is opposed to ivermectin usage. Very low ivermectin usage because it has been quite difficult to get a prescription for it and/or getting a pharmacy to fill it. A number of people have thus resorted to keeping the horse dewormer version of it on stock).
Cases have never been under ~11k, let alone under 1,000 or under 100.


INDIA'S VACCINATION NUMBERS:
(~2% "fully vaccinated" at end of April peak, ~17% "fully vaccinated" at end of September)

FORMER USA'S VACCINATION NUMBERS:
(~0% "fully vaccinated" at early-January peak, ~43% "fully vaccinated" at early-June, ~56% "fully vaccinated" at end of September)


It appears to me that aggressive usage of ivermectin (both prophylactically and therapeutically) has made a huge difference and has largely been successful... Meanwhile, the "JUST GET THE FUCKING JAB, OR ELSE!!!!" approach has made little/no difference and has largely been a complete failure.

Fuck Joe Biden.
Fuck tyranny.
Fuck the Demonkkkrat Party.

Wondering why neither you nor any other RW ever addressed this.

Brazil's tragic ivermectin frenzy is a warning to the US, experts say

Many Brazilians used to spend about $30 a head on what they called the "kit COVID." It was a mix of vitamins and other pills that President Jair Bolsonaro touted as early treatments for COVID-19, well before vaccines became widely available to prevent and minimize coronavirus infections. Among the "kit" drugs were the malaria pill hydroxychloroquine and the antiparasitic tablet ivermectin.

Brazilian authorities even at one point launched an app, called TrateCov, (in English, an abbreviation of "treat COVID") which recommended the sameseven "kit"

But Brazilians quickly discovered — through heart-wrenching personal experience — the limits of treating COVID-19 with ivermectin. Brazil suffered some of its worst death rates yet in late 2020 and early 2021, even in heavily ivermectin-dosed areas, as the more transmissible P1, or Gamma, variant spread quickly across the country.

The ivermectin strategy was once so popular in Brazil that entire towns tried it out. (Ivermectin is cheap and available in pharmacies across the country.)

In July 2020, ivermectin was available for free to all residents of Itajaí, to the tune of about $826,000 in government spending. The mayor of Itajaí, the physician Volnei Morastoni, said at that time that ivermectin was but "one more weapon in our war against the coronavirus."

Hospitals in Manaus ran out of oxygen in January, as the area recorded one of the highest death rates in the world.

https://www.businessinsider.com/brazil-tragic-ivermectin-for-covid-frenzy-warning-to-us-experts-2021-9?op=1


 
Back
Top