Ivermectin APPEARS TO BE WORKING WONDERS

Ivermectin and Hydroxy are not fake medicines. They are very very real medicines. While not specifically manufactured for COVID, it seems that they both might at least be a somewhat effective (if not a very effective) preventative/treatment option, especially ivermectin.

Bleach is a cleaning and sanitizing agent, not a medicine.

Their use in Covid is totally fake. They do not work. Trump made outrageous claims about them and righyts thought, If Trump says it, it must be true.
 
Why would you selectively believe scientific findings?

It's literally crazy to do so. Considering that Sybil lives part of his time in a different Universe, I take his thoughts with a large grain of salt.


The fantasy Trumpers have of ignoring science, but following treatments on FaceBook is a fascinating one.

FWIW, if an adult person wants to inject bleach into their veins or pop Horse Pills, and, despite repeated warnings not to do so, I vote for letting them do as they desire. Go for it. Shoot up.

hDkTY6E.jpg
 
What 'death level'? Covid19 does not kill.

You're insane, Sybil. How many horse pills have you ingested so far? I'm guessing ZERO because your caretakers won't let you. :cool:

Good luck stealing a cup of bleach from the janitor and making yourself some "Trump Kool-Aid".
 
The state constitution gives the state government the power to act. It does not contain all the legislation.

The state law requires vaccinations. Where is that "denied" when it is specifically mandated?
Still can't figure out what a constitution is, can ya? Vaccinations are not required in any school in the States of America.
 
Last edited:
Science is based on data. How fucking stupid are you? You make such crazy posts claiming absurdities and contradictions. You give me the creeps when I read your convoluted posts.

Science is not data. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Data is the result of an observation. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. Observations and the data they produce are evidence only.

You have no data. You are just quoting made up numbers. You deny both science and mathematics.
 
You'll get a more sensible response talking to Alexa or your Roomba than to Into the Night.

Roombas don't talk. The Alexa service just says what programmers tell it to say. Each skill is written by programmers.
Since it is YOU denying science and mathematics, it is YOU not making any sense.
 
Their use in Covid is totally fake. They do not work. Trump made outrageous claims about them and righyts thought, If Trump says it, it must be true.

Apparently Ivermectin and Hydroxy medications ARE effective against covid19. The data supporting them does not come from Trump.
 
It's literally crazy to do so. Considering that Sybil lives part of his time in a different Universe, I take his thoughts with a large grain of salt.


The fantasy Trumpers have of ignoring science, but following treatments on FaceBook is a fascinating one.
Inversion fallacy.
FWIW, if an adult person wants to inject bleach into their veins or pop Horse Pills, and, despite repeated warnings not to do so, I vote for letting them do as they desire. Go for it. Shoot up.

hDkTY6E.jpg
No one is prescribing injecting bleach. Ivermectine is a medicine used for both animals and humans because it's effective. It seems to be useful against covid19, according to the evidence, sock.

Who is Sybil? You keep referring to this person. Who are you talking to? IBdaMann, gfm, and myself are separate people living in different States. I'm the only one that uses a macaw in my icon. The science and the mathematics doesn't change. The only reason we sound the same is because we are using the same theories and mathematics.
 
Thanks, Sybil. How many times have you posted that same exact phrase on JPP with your various socks?

Name another member of JPP who uses the same exact phrase over and over and over again?

Is this your trouble? :laugh::laugh::laugh:

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That doesn't change no matter who says it, sock.
GFM learned it from me. He once showed up on another forum rather confused. He has taken the time to study it out and learn. He knows the philosophy that defines science this way and where it comes from. He tells you the same thing I do because it is the same no matter who says it. Science is defined by philosophy. He will oft times use the same phrasing as me as a result. He has learned a LOT since I first found him on that other forum. He not only knows, for example, the theories of science YOU deny, such as the 1st law of thermodynamics, he understands some of the history of how that theory came about, though not as well as I do.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Nothing more. Nothing less. That's it. That's all. It is not data or made up numbers. It is not a government agency. It is not a degree, license, certification, or any other sanctification. It is not a book, pamphlet, brochure, website, or magazine. It is not a prize. It is not guys dressed in white lab coats. It is not even people at all. It is just the theories themselves. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Theories that YOU deny, specifically the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and your continual attempt to describe the problems of phenomenology or a collection of random numbers as 'science'.

Mathematics is a closed functional system. It is based on the founding rules of that system, called axioms. Change the rules, and you are no longer playing the game of mathematics. You deny mathematics, specifically statistical mathematics, probability mathematics, and random number mathematics. EVERY proof in mathematics traces back to the founding axioms.

Logic is also a closed functional system. It too is based on the founding rules of that system, also called axioms. Change the rules, and you are no longer playing the game of logic. You deny logic, specifically the various fallacies you keep making over and over. A fallacy is an error in logic, similar to a math error. You so so far as to mock logic, denying it in the process. You are only demonstrating your illiteracy in logic when you do so.

None of this changes. Just because another person says the same thing, it comes from the same source. Sources which YOU deny, sock. To you, religion is 'science'. You are devout believer in the Church of Covid, the Church of Global Warming, the Church of Green, and the Church of Karl Marx.

IBdaMann hasn't been here in a while. He's basically given up on you idiots. He currently spends most of his time on another forum learning graphic tools to make more effective memes. He's starting to get good at it! He also understands what science is and why. He also understands what mathematics is and why. He and I have had our differences (which you never saw, they occurred on another forum!), specifically around certain aspects of economics and the meaning of infinity. He and I started the Politiplex forum. He provided most of the material in the reference section. I provided some myself there. That material is simply the theories YOU deny, the Constitution which YOU deny, and some of the works of Karl Marx which YOU endorse.

We are all conservatives, but have different religious beliefs, though gfm and I are both Christian. IBdaMann is not. He is an atheist. To him, a god or gods may or may not exist. He simply doesn't care.

I am not sure of gfm's occupation, though he does have a good sense of basic engineering, like a good farmer would. He doesn't know how the electrical generating and distributing system works (well, some of it he has learned), for example. I do. The company I own manufactures instrumentation for industrial, aerospace, and medical uses. I know the engineering, the chemistry, and why aircraft is designed the way they are and how they fly. I sell to marine uses too, including giant cruise ships and container ships. I know many of their systems including their propulsion systems that are in use.

None of use are named 'Sybil' or use that moniker.

Since you are so into socks, I have found several accounts that argue just the way you do, and make the same mistakes you do. It is YOU that has socks. You are only describing yourself.
 
Last edited:

You're a liar since I've never denied any of those things you claimed:

"Theories that YOU deny, specifically the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and your continual attempt to describe the problems of phenomenology as 'science'."

$1000 says you can't prove your own fucking words, Sybil.
 
Back
Top