Joe Biden loves groping children

noun
noun: pervert; plural noun: perverts
/ˈpərvərt/

a person whose sexual behavior is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable.
 
9TuY3Pk.jpg
 
Biden is a handsy guy who broke through personal barriers. he grabbed men and women. He made some people uncomfortable. he was not groping and specifically not groping children. Trump and Epstein were banging underage women. Biden had no sexual relationships with kids. He went forehead to forehead with other senators. He was not sexually abusing them either. He is not Trump.
 
its not Bidens fault people like you are perverts

We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.
 
We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.

You should also take some responsibility from allowing TRUMPTARDS to accuse Biden of something he is clearly not!

That's OK! We understand your political Bias!

You should have a rule- unless someone has been convicted of such a crime- THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED HERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE TO ACCUSE ANYONE OF BEING A PEDOPHILE! That would serve Trump well as well, as he has never been convicted of it either! SO what I am asking for is BI-PARTISAN!

SO please do the right thing- as you are our leader here SIR!
 
MOST GRANDPA'S DO, YOU MORON....GET YOUR HEAD OUT THE GUTTER AND GET YOUR HARD ON'S FROM TRUMP AND HIS NASTY ASS WTH HIS OWN DAUGHTER
 
We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.


you have pus for a brain
 
We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.

Just my two cents, I think it might help to read the room. Since 12b is only enforced when someone mentions a POSTER, you are going to continue to see useless pedophile threads that add zero to the discussion created for the SOLE purpose of baiting a 12b. You know it and I know it. So do the authors of the threads. It would be simple enough to end that, but you've made a decision not to, so you really shouldn't be surprised where these threads go. I can only assume you think that dozens of threads accusing POTUS of being a pedophile are fine with you. If it was me, I wouldn't parse the language, I'd drop the hammer on pedophilia threads, but you've chosen not to, and this is the result. It is what it is.
 
We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.

dont pretend you have ethics, we all know better
 
Just my two cents, I think it might help to read the room. Since 12b is only enforced when someone mentions a POSTER, you are going to continue to see useless pedophile threads that add zero to the discussion created for the SOLE purpose of baiting a 12b. You know it and I know it. So do the authors of the threads. It would be simple enough to end that, but you've made a decision not to, so you really shouldn't be surprised where these threads go. I can only assume you think that dozens of threads accusing POTUS of being a pedophile are fine with you. If it was me, I wouldn't parse the language, I'd drop the hammer on pedophilia threads, but you've chosen not to, and this is the result. It is what it is.

Exactly. That needs to be stopped.
 
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

The rule is clear.
 
Back
Top