Joe Biden loves groping children

Geeko Sportivo said:
You should also take some responsibility from allowing TRUMPTARDS to accuse Biden of something he is clearly not!

That's OK! We understand your political Bias!

You should have a rule- unless someone has been convicted of such a crime- THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED HERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE TO ACCUSE ANYONE OF BEING A PEDOPHILE! That would serve Trump well as well, as he has never been convicted of it either! SO what I am asking for is BI-PARTISAN!

SO please do the right thing- as you are our leader here SIR!
Click to expand...

It would show bias if I would, say, stop y'all from posting the images with Trump's daughter sitting on his lap while you accuse him of the same... but I don't. The right thing is to let folks talk about our leaders. Even if you or I don't like what they have to say. It is also not against the rules to do so, but it is against the rules you agreed to follow to try to project the same onto a member of the forum.
 
Damocles said:
It would show bias if I would, say, stop y'all from posting the images with Trump's daughter sitting on his lap while you accuse him of the same... but I don't. The right thing is to let folks talk about our leaders. Even if you don't like what they have to say.
Click to expand...

Those images were to counteract. Without endless pedo threads, we wouldn't have them here.
 
AProudLefty said:
Those images were to counteract. Without endless pedo threads, we wouldn't have them here.
Click to expand...

That is total rubbish. The images appeared long before the Creepy Joe images appeared and have been a near constant ever since he started running. And they are allowed because he was running and was President. Just as the "Creepy Joe" images are allowed because of the same.

You should not pretend that one side of the political horseshoe has some sort of moral authority, not while you post here and direct evidence contradicts you.
 
Concart said:
Just my two cents, I think it might help to read the room. Since 12b is only enforced when someone mentions a POSTER, you are going to continue to see useless pedophile threads that add zero to the discussion created for the SOLE purpose of baiting a 12b. You know it and I know it. So do the authors of the threads. It would be simple enough to end that, but you've made a decision not to, so you really shouldn't be surprised where these threads go. I can only assume you think that dozens of threads accusing POTUS of being a pedophile are fine with you. If it was me, I wouldn't parse the language, I'd drop the hammer on pedophilia threads, but you've chosen not to, and this is the result. It is what it is.
Click to expand...

It isn't enforced because it isn't against the rules to talk about any public figure in even these terms. I didn't say I was surprised, I said I had let him skirt the line long enough and gave him a warning and a reminder of the rules that he agreed to follow.
 
Your two sub rules:

1. No sexual comments relating to minors.
2. A news article must be included.

Clearly the OP broke both sub rules.
 
AProudLefty said:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

The rule is clear.
Click to expand...

The rule is clear. What posters do with it is not. Almost all of the vile molesting comments made here about Pres. Biden are not based on any sort of news article at all. They're just thrown out there to see if the shit sticks to the wall.

As far as Concart's comment about posters who start threads about pedophilia in the hopes of entrapping someone, Legion is the king, queen, prince, and princess of that. It's disgusting, pointless, and has little to nothing to do with politics. He's one of the forum's biggest snitches, and he starts them expressly to try to trigger some moron into a 12b blunder. Most ppl wisely avoid those threads.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
The rule is clear. What posters do with it is not. Almost all of the vile molesting comments made here about Pres. Biden are not based on any sort of news article at all. They're just thrown out there to see if the shit sticks to the wall.

As far as Concart's comment about posters who start threads about pedophilia in the hopes of entrapping someone, Legion is the king, queen, prince, and princess of that. It's disgusting, pointless, and has little to nothing to do with politics. He's one of the forum's biggest snitches, and he starts them expressly to try to trigger some moron into a 12b blunder. Most ppl wisely avoid those threads.
Click to expand...

9TuY3Pk.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

The rule is clear.
Click to expand...

That seems clear and to the point
 
Damocles said:
We've let you walk the line enough. Rules allow you to talk about Biden and his documented hands on approach to children, it does not allow you to pretend that users have the same issue even if you really want imagine them having the issue.

12b is a rule you agreed to follow when you joined.
Click to expand...

Biden is not acting sexually. If you think that, he is acting sexually with adult men and women too. he is handy with all people. Biden is not doing anything wrong.
 
Damocles said:
It would show bias if I would, say, stop y'all from posting the images with Trump's daughter sitting on his lap while you accuse him of the same... but I don't. The right thing is to let folks talk about our leaders. Even if you or I don't like what they have to say. It is also not against the rules to do so, but it is against the rules you agreed to follow to try to project the same onto a member of the forum.
Click to expand...

Decent folks are not going to appreciate the FAKE NEWS and downright lies about any of our presidents.

And decent Folks are not going to post lies about presidents either. LET THAT SINK IN FOR A MINUTE!

When you talk about posting pictures, I don't really have a problem with that, as it is not as easy to lie when you are looking at the proof.

Decent people are smart enough to detect an edited video or photo by easily doing a quick picture or video search.

But outright lying here in the forum right in the thread title should be against the rules.

Biden is not a pedophile and you know it. So, that makes you an accessory to the LIE MR. FORUM MANAGER for allowing it to broadcast on your site.

Other Media outlets have tried to be responsible and are now reprimanding those who violate the rules and deliberately post Untruths and slanderous lies on their media sites.

THE QUESTION IS, ARE YOU GOING TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW MEMBERS TO POST SLANDEROUS LIES- right in the Thread Title- and are you personally going to continue to be an accessory to the lies told here? THAT IS THE QUESTION!

CLEAN UP YOUR HOUSE MAN!

Because it has become pretty disgusting under your leadership!
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
It isn't enforced because it isn't against the rules to talk about any public figure in even these terms. I didn't say I was surprised, I said I had let him skirt the line long enough and gave him a warning and a reminder of the rules that he agreed to follow.
Click to expand...

fuck you, you are a pus brain ass hole
 
Nordberg said:
Biden is not acting sexually. If you think that, he is acting sexually with adult men and women too. he is handy with all people. Biden is not doing anything wrong.
Click to expand...

This isn't about what I believe, it is about what is permitted.
 
Damocles said:
This isn't about what I believe, it is about what is permitted.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is why absolutely nobody has charged him with any crimes. Trump and Epstein were having sex with young girls. Trump admitted that. Righty are OK with that, but Biden being handsy, now that is a crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top