Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Their open hatred of education would suggest not much education.
Agreed.
Their open hatred of education would suggest not much education.
You don't get to call my bluff, Terry. I will play with you for as long as I wish.I'm calling your bluff, Sybil.
Too funny. Not only are there plenty of such examples, it's actually how Into the Night and I "met", i.e. over a few knock down - drag downs. He is an engineer who uses engineering and marketing terms, whereas I use purist old-school math and science. He and I share many of the same views but neither of us is going to switch lexicons anytime soon. If you weren't in a persistent vegetative state, you would have keyed in on this long ago. Also, Into the Night and gfm7175 hold certain religious views that I, as an atheist, just don't share. If you weren't being fed through a tube, you'd have clued in on that long since.Show me a single post where you three "good friends", who know where each of the other lives, ever disagreed and insulted each other.
Incorrect. You alone believe it. I happen to know where I can find such posts. I simply have no interest in letting you see them. My interests are in fuqqing with you. You turn to me in desperation to PROVE something to you that I have no interest in showing. Instead, I'm going to fuq with you.You and I both know you can't do it.
You're a lying leftist (I know, redundant) and right now you are lying about not being a leftist. Your level of brain-dead gives you away.I'm not Leftist,
Neither Into the Night, gfm7175, nor GasGuzzler (did you see how I'm including him?) are brain-dead, scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept. If you weren't hooked up to machines for life support, Terry, you would have noticed this long ago.yet you've insulted us. Never your alter egos.
Their open hatred of education would suggest not much education.
Too funny. If you want to feign belief that there is only one person behind multiple "socks", you can't be agreeing to the plural possessive pronoun "their".Agreed.
Too funny. If you want to feign belief that there is only one person behind multiple "socks", you can't be agreeing to the plural possessive pronoun "their".
Like I said, your level of brain-dead gives you away. You should run your posts by me before you post, and save yourself a lot of embarrassment.
Who is this "Terry" you're so paranoid about, Sybil? What can I do to act more like him? LOLYou don't get to call my bluff, Terry.....
You don't get to call my bluff, Terry. I will play with you for as long as I wish.
Too funny. Not only are there plenty of such examples, it's actually how Into the Night and I "met", i.e. over a few knock down - drag downs. He is an engineer who uses engineering and marketing terms, whereas I use purist old-school math and science. He and I share many of the same views but neither of us is going to switch lexicons anytime soon. If you weren't in a persistent vegetative state, you would have keyed in on this long ago. Also, Into the Night and gfm7175 hold certain religious views that I, as an atheist, just don't share. If you weren't being fed through a tube, you'd have clued in on that long since.
Anyway, I have a great deal of respect for Into the Nght and gfm7175 both, so don't be looking to me to begin insulting them on your command. It will have to wait until I feel particularly azzholish, perhaps after a few rum&cokes and with Rammstein playing. And you should add GasGuzzler to the list. He and I agree a lot, he just doesn't post on this site. I should bring him over just to fuq with you. He and I are more closely aligned in that regard, so just start adding his name to the list now. There's no reason to wait until the last moment.
Incorrect. You alone believe it. I happen to know where I can find such posts. I simply have no interest in letting you see them. My interests are in fuqqing with you. You turn to me in desperation to PROVE something to you that I have no interest in showing. Instead, I'm going to fuq with you.
So, besides gfm7175, Cypress and Into the Night, which ones are my other eleven socks?
You're a lying leftist (I know, redundant) and right now you are lying about not being a leftist. Your level of brain-dead gives you away.
Neither Into the Night, gfm7175, nor GasGuzzler (did you see how I'm including him?) are brain-dead, scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept. If you weren't hooked up to machines for life support, Terry, you would have noticed this long ago.
So, what are my other eleven socks, Terry? Don't worry, there's no pressure. Vegetables get unlimited guesses.
Ooooh, Terry understandably panics at the thought of logic entering the picture.Ooooh. Sybil tries to use logic.
Yes that includes you, Dr. Dahmer. Oh yes and you too, T. A.
... but what was your take on DOUBLE masking? After all, my mask's double protects your double, and your mask's double protects my double.Are you including your take on masking? You were wrong about that (and I was right) jus sayin.
You think learning engineering, science, and mathematics is "indoctrination"? OK.
I'm not Cypress nor do I have alternate accounts on JPP.
How many accounts do you have on JPP? Please be honest.
I fully understand if you can't or won't answer.
I'm not Cypress nor do I have alternate accounts on JPP.
How many accounts do you have on JPP? Please be honest.
I fully understand if you can't or won't answer.
No. I think what you went through and call 'education' is indoctrination.
You discard engineering, science, and mathematics.
I really do not think you realize how tough it is to keep on the lights. You flick a light switch, and the light comes on. You assume it is all easy. There are some very smart people working very hard to make it easy for you.
If those people were not educated, our society would very quickly collapse.
Our experts once did a much better job keeping the lights on.
The decline in performance has been stunning.
Are you including your take on masking? You were wrong about that (and I was right) jus sayin.
THAT IS A LIE. You and your sock, Doc, have talked more about my degree than I ever did.
You can't talk science so you bully.
And lie.
A lying bully. You must be proud of yourself.
What a tool.
Lying won't help you.
There is a thread somewhere around here where you repeatedly boasted about your alleged 'geochem' PhD, your lab research, your stellar scientific bonafides.
All you do is frantically google tidbits of scientific information and sprint back here to pass it off as your own original thoughts. Like you did with electron orbitals.
That is not a sign of scientific literacy, scientific competency, or scientific wisdom.
That is a sign of a frantic Googler who wants to look more informed than they actually are.
The fact Perry is backpedaling on his PhD is very interesting.