Judge reprimands Trump during his rape trial

Don Trump Jr deleted his posts, so he must have taken the judges warning seriously

Junior has a lot more to lose than Pedo Don. Pedon Don won't be going to prison, but Junior could easily end up doing a few years. LOL
 
It is about Trump's childish penchant to keep blabbing and insulting in public and online. He defamed her. He damaged her work and her life.

right. so she wants financial compensation.

not a rape trial. go tell the retard I was arguing with
 
right. so she wants financial compensation.

not a rape trial. go tell the retard I was arguing with
$20 says she'd prefer to see Trump stripped naked in public and gang-raped by angry pedophiles rather than money.

TBH, I'd pay money to see that myself. :thup:
 
It's where she wrote that he attacked her in the department store.

...and then Trump defamed her...multiple times. Including his "Truths" before the trial.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-jean-carroll-donald-trump-rape-b2327336.html
Donald Trump furiously tried to pour doubts on E Jean Carroll’s rape claims against him as he spoke out for the first time since their civil defamation trial began.

The former president took to Truth Social on Wednesday morning ahead of the first day of testimony in the bombshell case pitting himself against Ms Carroll, who accused Mr Trump of raping her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in the 1990s.

In a pair of posts, he branded the case a “witch hunt” as he unleashed a series of victim-shaming assumptions about her allegations.

“The E. Jean Carroll case, Ms. Bergdorf Goodman, is a made up SCAM,” Mr Trump wrote. “Her lawyer is a political operative, financed by a big political donor that they said didn’t exist, only to get caught lying about that.”

“Just look at her CNN interview before & after the commercial break - Like a different person. She said there was a dress, using the ol’ Monica Lewinsky ‘stuff’, then she didn’t want to produce it. The dress should be allowed to be part of the case. This is a fraudulent & false story--Witch Hunt!”

In the second post, Mr Trump went on to claim that Ms Carroll and her attorneys “got caught lying! The Miss Bergdorf Goodman case is financed by a big political donor that they tried to hide”.

“Does anybody believe that I would take a then almost 60 year old woman that I didn’t know, from the front door of a very crowded department store, (with me being very well known, to put it mildly!), into a tiny dressing room, and …. her,” he wrote. “She didn’t scream? There are no witnesses? Nobody saw this? She never made a police complaint? If I was seen there with a woman-BIG PRESS. SCAM!”
 
I suspect the info told to Trump's lawyers may have reached Trump. He will likely ignore it. Then witness tampering can be added to the charges.

Who cares?

This thread, as with everything that you Nazis spew about the object of your insane hatred, is hyperbole and demagoguery.

Orwell predicted you would act like this - but he foresaw a "2 minute hate," you filth engage in 24/7 hate.
 
DOWN UNDER DUMBASS
THAT IS WHO I'VE ALWAYS BEEN
AND EVER SHALL BE

7ke5hs.gif
You should get a job, bogan.

You post so much here that it's clear you are unemployed.
 
right. so she wants financial compensation.

not a rape trial. go tell the retard I was arguing with

What else can she ask for, public flogging? It is a defamation trial that was predicated on a rape. Her lawyers had to make that rape believable to the jurors on a preponderance of the evidence. If you followed the trial you would have noted, the first few days were all about rape. That is what her witnesses attested to. That's what her testimony was about.
 
Back
Top