Kyle Rittenhouse

...Jarod wets panties.

Most ambulance chasers don’t fuck with medical malpractice from what I understand. Only the really hungry ones because the docs that take the trouble to fight them are far more knowledgeable about what constitutes ‘standard of care’ than what the scheisters are taught in law school.
 
Last edited:
I have a friend that's an ER doc in Douglas, GA, same thing. Sue every doc on the chart and hope something lands. He LOVES getting sued. Not only does he win every time but he gets a real kick out of making the ambulance chasers look stupid.
I was an expert witness once when I was the dental director at a community health center when an employee/dentist was sued.
Long story short I made the ambulance chaser look like a total fool at the deposition complete with text book documentation and scientific publications that totally quashed his arguments.
Here is something that might interest you. My sister in laws 80 y.o mother goes to a dentist for cleaning during which she gets Xrayed.

Dentist : You have a spot under your tooth and we need to remove it. (Per her)

Her: No, I'm not losing a tooth just clean my teeth.

Her Two weeks later: The dentist cleaned my teeth and now my tooth hurts because he messed with it

Me: You should have let him remove the tooth it could be very dangerous

Her : I'm not losing a tooth

Sister in Law one week later : Mom is in the hospital with endocarditis

:thinking::shocked:

My sister in law and her mother are both very kind sweet women but they are both very head strong. They constantly call me for medical advice but then don't take my advice. It drives me nuts.
 
Last edited:
I have a friend that's an ER doc in Douglas, GA, same thing. Sue every doc on the chart and hope something lands. He LOVES getting sued. Not only does he win every time but he gets a real kick out of making the ambulance chasers look stupid.
I was an expert witness once when I was the dental director at a community health center when an employee/dentist was sued.
Long story short I made the ambulance chaser look like a total fool at the deposition complete with text book documentation and scientific publications that totally quashed his arguments.

Yeah in my deposition the Ambulance chaser said I let the patient lay around in the ER for hours and hours. I said she was in and out the door and on a helicopter ambulance in 75 minutes and it took the helicopter 45 minutes just to get there. He couldn't change the subject fast enough. :laugh:

My insurance company gave the case for review with an ER doc who had an impressive resume. He said I did everything correctly. The insurance company said they would take it to court if I wanted or just settle if I wanted. I told them I did not want to settle. So the case against me got dropped in arbitration. It was a monumental waste of my time. It cost me 3 days of work. The ambulance chaser strung it along as far as he could hoping to squeeze a few thousand out of me just to make it go away. That is how they work.
 
Last edited:
Most ambulance chasers don’t fuck with medical malpractice from what I understand. Only the really hungry ones because the docs that take the trouble to fight them are far more knowledgeable about what constitutes ‘standard of care’ than what the scheisters are taught in law school.

This particular ambulance chaser hit the big time with a $5 million dollar settlement. A pulmonologist identified a cancerous lung but got his left and right sides reversed because he was standing in a different position than normal when he did the pulmonoscopy study. Consequently the moron Thoracic Surgeon removed the wrong lung because he was in just too big of hurry to look at xrays before the surgery. BOOM! 5 million dollar judgement. I knew the anesthesiologist on that case and he got sued too he told them he wouldn't settle even for one fucking red cent. He eventually was dropped from the case. The lawyer started at 160 K to then 120K 100K 50K then dropped the case against the anesthesiologist. Legal extortion. st
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I've never been sued or disciplined by a state board and had a great practice before selling it. Any problem pts. I had I'd dismiss in a heartbeat.

I doubt you'd make it past the front desk on your first appointment.

Observing and recognizing personality disorders is just a hobby of mine after I took an 8 hr. CE course on it.
You're a fascinating subject without a doubt.

So you say. Your behavior is all anyone on JPP can go by; your veracity, your respect for the rights of others, your support for American ideals, etc.

If I did, I doubt I'd make a second one since the attitude of medical offices can be readily seen in the staff.

An excellent example of your attitude. Thanks for the insight.
 
A couple of weeks ago, i'm standing in line to do some business and this guy behind me is chatting away on his cell phone talking about how he almost got fired from his auto sales job at a dealership. Turns out that Kyle came in looking to buy a car and this guy noticed who he was, went to his manager, and told him that he refused to deal with Kyle..............

I'd have fired him on the spot...........

So would I.
 
apples and oranges...........nice try though. what if it turned out that the armed man was an off duty police officer????? you'd be facing charges for sure..........

this sets a bad example, though, of an unfortunate situation where i'm forced to agree with some of the more anti gun numbnuts on here.............that certain people should not be allowed to have guns.........and just so you're not missing the point, i'm talking about YOU.........because you don't have the ability to THINK before shooting.

It wasn't even a nice try. It's The Sock making shit up again. He's such a fruitcase he doesn't know the difference between apples and oranges.
 
Again, anymouse, you're free to be a racist, a liar and a bullshitting hater of the United States and our military.

As long as you don't break the law, you are free to be the biggest asswipe in America. :thup:

You are describing yourself again, Sock. Inversion fallacy (projection).
 
What kind of adult person aggrandizes a slimy kid like Rittenhouse?

I mean, really, think about it.

Would you want to imagine bearing or siring something like that?
 
Let me dismantled your FoxNews/NewsMax/RealAmericasVoice BS piece by piece:
FOX is owned by Democrats. A jury is not FOX 'news' or any other news agency.
1. He wasn't a resident to begin with.
Irrelevant.
2. He wasn't a family member nor living at that residence, so how the gun was stored is of no consequence or even in question.
Irrelevant.
3. He did not have a permit to open carry a weapon, much less be in possession of one.
He doesn't need one. Irrelevant.
3. Neither he or his friend were "hunting" or even target shooting in a riot situation at night, so by giving him the weapon and then going into the situation was a violation of the law.
Irrelevant. Guns are for more than just hunting and target shooting.
4. Not quite. The judge did a questionable ruling which requires ignoring one rule for another EXPLAINER: Why did judge drop Rittenhouse gun charge?
He did not do any such thing. You are quoting made up shit again. You mindlessly cut and paste.
5. Spare me the time honored gun monkey BS regarding assault rifles. AR-15 STYLE weapons do exactly what they were originally designed for....to give schmucks like you a high impact semi-auto rifle that's relatively light weight with more controllable recoil TO KILL ONE OR MULTIPLE TARGETS QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY.
There is no such thing as an 'assault rifle'. Kyle used a legal weapon to neutralize three attackers (multiple targets) in just three shots. Any semi-automatic would do. Self defense is an inherent right.
Essentially, widdle Kyle got away with manslaughter. Now he's going to face a trial similar to what OJ Simpson faced....one that has a lesser degree of proof for conviction. Ironic, isn't it? ;)
Illegal, and no such thing is occurring.

Stop making shit up.
 
So when all is said and done, widdle Kyle gets off
...and widdle YOU can't stand someone defending themselves.
because the weapon he was NOT legally allowed to possess,
He is and was legally allowed to possess it.
NOT because his friend WAS NOT legally allowed to give to him
Also legal.
because neither of them were target shooting or hunting, but because the weapon he used to commit manslaughter had a short barrel.
No it didn't, and irrelevant.
Yeah, I already knew that .... it's schizoid technicality.
No such thing.
Or in other words, bad judgement that kept crucial evidence from the jury,
No evidence was kept from the jury.
So you are mindlessly cutting and pasting hate speech and propaganda from the Associated Press again.
Yeah, that makes sense. :rolleyes: Somehow, I don't see that flying in a civil case involving wrongful death.
Already acquitted, dope.
Carry on, Chicken Little. Pew-pew-pew indeed.
Don't attack Kyle. He will defend himself, and he's a good shot!
 
1. No one asked widdle Kyle to go to Kenosha.
Irrelevant.
He was a right wing jackass like you,
Being a conservative is not being a jackass. You are describing Democrats. They even represent themselves with a jackass.
enabled by his mom (another piece of work) who traveled cross state to live out his Turner Diaries fantasy.
How typical. You can't properly attack Kyle, so you attack his relatives. Lame.
No one knows what transpired prior to the shooting precisely (no video as to who started what),
There certainly is. It was even presented in court. Guess you missed that part.
but what is known is that he committed manslaughter
Nope. Self defense is not manslaughter.
and got off because the judge denied the jury certain evidence due to an archaic rule about gun barrel length.
Irrelevant. Gun barrel length is not an issue.
Now he's facing a civil suit, where EVERYTHING is on the table, and the BS the other judge rule won't fly. Should be interesting.
Everything including the acquittal and all the evidence that brought it about.
2. NO ONE knew of the prior conviction of one of the persons widdle Kyle shot.
Irrelevant.
3. Cops let widdle Kyle go after he gets in their eye sight and confesses to shooting someone. Why? The civil trial may include the local cops in a suit as well for negligence.
Yeah...let's sue the police department for protecting the public from entering the area of violence. Violence caused by Antifa and BLM fucks that are supported by DEMOCRATS.
4. Vigilante actions don't automatically equate "patriotism".
They certainly can, but this is a case of self defense.
5. If this was a communist country and I was a communist, Kyle would be in jail and so would you as I would report you to the KGB (or Gestapo).
Which is what you want, Commie.
Clearly that is not the case,
so stop babbling like a MAGA mook and discuss the issue rationally and logically, based on facts.
Not possible. First, MAGA isn't a person. Second, you are not being rational. You are even denying your own arguments. Third, you are making fallacy after fallacy, so you are denying and discarding logic. Fourth, you are not using any facts. You are simply making accusations by chanting what your Democrat leaders told you to say. Learn what 'fact' is. A fact is NOT fiction, nor a proof, nor a Universal Truth.

Your own hate is eating you alive.
 

1. No shit Sherlock!?! That has been established and STILL puts widdle Kyle and his dopey friend in violation of the laws (no target practice, hunting intended, no legal right to carry in public streets).

2. Either you can't read or you're just a bad liar. The law plainly states that under aged persons cannot possess or carry a weapon unless under the supervision of an adult for the express purpose of target practice or hunting. Having widdle Kyle sitting in a house with the gun as a gift doesn't justify the subsequent actions (no hunting or target practice, roaming the streets at night with a loaded weapon).

3. Yeah, I told YOU about the barrel length BS. Because of that archaic law, the judge kept vital information from the jury. Here's how that "logic" works: an out-of-towner arrives in a city that is having civil unrest/riots. He is driven there by his mother, as he is not of age to have a full driver's license. He goes to friends house, where they both dress up in para-military type clothes and carry some first aid kits. The friend gives the out-of-towner an AR-15 style weapon, of which by law he (under age) is NOT allowed to have or carry in public. He can only use in hunting or target practice SUPERVISED BY THE ADULT THAT GAVE HIM THE WEAPON. They go to the area of civil unrest/riot, enter pass the police line. The out-of-towner goes to areas where there are small businesses (UNINVITED) BRANDISHING THEIR WEAPONS, and becomes embroiled in a confrontation with some of the rioters. Scuffles and a chase ensues, with the out-of-towner shooting his chasers, killing two, wounding one. He goes to present cops and states he just shot some people, but is not detained, disarmed or arrested. He leaves the area, later to turn himself in.


We can rehash this until the cows come home, but YOU CANNOT ELIMINATE ALL THE FACTS TO WHICH THE JUDGES RULING WAS DUBIOUS AT BEST.

The civil trial is going to be REAL interesting.[/QUOTE]

RAAA. You are still chanting mindlessly.
 
I got sued once. It was a sued every doctor on the chart thing.. They even sue the radiologist that read the CT correctly. I eventually was dismissed from the suit and did not have a a judgement against me but it hung over my head for 5 years. I saw this woman in the ER of a small hospital. I correctly diagnosed her then arranged for transfer to a much larger Fort Worth hospital that could care for her. The only helicopter ambulance was 45 minutes away in Dallas. She was transferred and left my hospital 75 minutes after she checked in. She arrived with the same vitals as she had when she was transferred. She died of sepsis 3 hours after she arrived in Fort Worth. I hate ambulance chasing lawyers. This was legal extortion. None of the docs did anything wrong . Her husband just kept her at home poking Vicodin down her until she was too sick for anyone to save.
Such a wasteful death, and needless pain. You did what you could. Here in Washington, we try to disburse helicopter ambulances better. It's still not enough though in some cases. Sepsis, unfortunately, is often missed by people assuming it's just a stubborn flu or something until it's too late.

I agree. These 'sue everybody in sight' practices need to stop. Money grubbing bastards. This happens to doctors like you, pilots, aircraft mechanics, pyrotechnicians, auto mechanics, fire fighters, contractors, etc.

It is legal extortion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top