Last time Earth hit these CO2 levels there were trees at the South Pole

Well I have a degree in chemistry

You lost a debate.

To avoid admitting that loss, you invent a personal anecdote that you will refuse to verify.

So again, you're doing what Anonymoose and Teflon did...you make shit up about yourself to paper over the deficits in your arguments.

Fraud.
 
Seems to me that you don't want to have a debate that will result in you having to admit you're wrong about something.

Why is whether or not I believe in man made global warming so important to you?

If I said I believed in it but personally did nothing about it, would you be happy?
 
There is certainly no way that you've ever had any exposure to the scientific method. It

Looks like someone was furiously typing on their keyboard and left a fragment behind.

Don't type angry, baby.

Secondly, if you have a degree in Chemistry, then I have a Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Looks like my qualifications supersede yours. So you're out of credibility with me.
 
You lost a debate.

To avoid admitting that loss, you invent a personal anecdote that you will refuse to verify.

So again, you're doing what Anonymoose and Teflon did...you make shit up about yourself to paper over the deficits in your arguments.

Fraud.

You're a truly weird arsehole, waste of space!
 
You lost a debate.

To avoid admitting that loss, you invent a personal anecdote that you will refuse to verify.

So again, you're doing what Anonymoose and Teflon did...you make shit up about yourself to paper over the deficits in your arguments.

Fraud.

Tom is limey cunt but on this topic he is the most knowledgeable on JPP
 
I will let you find one.

So you either did Lazy Man's work, or Lying Man's work.

If it's Lazy Man's work, then you just did a simple, superficial Google search of the terms you needed to post your shit.

If it's Lying Man's work, then you actually saw those bigger models, saw they undermined your argument, and chose to withhold them or cherry pick the chart.

So are you lazy or a liar?
 
Why is that? Are opinions not allowed on message boards?

You seem stunned that people would dare question your bullshit opinons, forcing you to defend them.

Then you say you don't have to defend them.

So you have positions you refuse to defend, that you will profess.

So you're just trolling. You're not serious about this or anything. Not even your beliefs. It's all fungible with you, isn't it?
 
Why is whether or not I believe in man made global warming so important to you?

See, when a Conservative can no longer win a debate, they decide to unilaterally change the subject to the person who just exposed their fraud and ignorance.

You should just not have responded. That's the best thing you can do for yourself at this point; don't respond.
 
Why is whether or not I believe in man made global warming so important to you?

If I said I believed in it but personally did nothing about it, would you be happy?

You got fucked up in this debate, and now you're searching for a way out.

So after arrogantly arguing your position with fake anecdotes, and getting called out on them, your instinct is to now back away from the veracity of your previous position to gaslight me.

Nothing you say about yourself is true, is it?
 
Back
Top