Latest AMS paper shows sea level rise to be less than 1.5mm/year

moon2012 said:
That will be a result of their covert Plankton Fattening program. Fatter plankton means more water displacement - and you know what THAT means, doncha maggot.
Click to expand...

It means you're full of shit, but that's not exactly a new discovery.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
It means you're full of shit, but that's not exactly a new discovery.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It ain't me that's denying the fact that a rising sea level will be catastrophic for everybody.
You won't be around though, scab maggot- so why should you worry.

There are lots of sick old bastards like you who despise the younger generations and piss upon their aspirations.
 
moon2012 said:
It ain't me that's denying the fact that a rising sea level will be catastrophic for everybody.
You won't be around though, scab maggot- so why should you worry.

There are lots of sick old bastards like you who despise the younger generations and piss upon their aspirations.
Click to expand...


The paper posted by the American Meteorological Society is showing that your beliefs are based on erroneous suppositions. In fact NOAA agrees pretty much with their conclusions!!

Regional Trends Comparison (4 Main Regions, various subregions)

The graphs compare the 95% confidence intervals of relative mean sea level trends for CO-OPS and global stations. Trends with the narrowest confidence intervals are based on the longest data sets. Trends with the widest confidence intervals are based on only 30-40 years of data. The graphs can provide an overarching indication of the differing rates of regional vertical land motion, given that the absolute global sea level rise is believed to be 1.7-1.8 millimeters/year. Note that they are relative sea level trends, and are not corrected for local land movement. The calculated trends for all CO-OPS stations are available as a table in millimeters/year and in feet/century. A complete table of non-CO-OPS station trends are available as a table in millimeters/year and in feet/century.
Click to expand...



http://archive.is/mHxbZ#selection-1583.397-1583.474



Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
moon2012 said:
Go wave it to the folk up your East Coast.
How much of your coastline has reverted to ' marine wildlife sanctuaries ' lately ? Scab maggot.
Click to expand...

Whilst you were attending the Hamas High School for propaganda and agitprop, others learnt about longshore drift! In fact, a good friend of mine is a world renowned expert on soil and coastal erosion. He's just come back from the Karoo Desert in South Africa.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
I post a peer reviewed paper published by the AMS and you dismiss summarily out of hand. So what are your scientific qualifications, oh obese one?

Lookjs like I need to reiterate what was said in the OP.

"It is easy to fool someone, but it is almost impossible to convince them that they have been fooled. That is the fraudsters staple psychological tool used by the likes of Al Gore and many others."


Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

They never post anything scientific. Ever. Their entire argument consists of an appeal to authority. They refuse to look at any links or science that a skeptic posts so they never even consider the evidence. Even when confronted with evidence, the typical alarmist will simply ignore it. It's a religious belief where everything is seen as evidence for global warming. Take the recent polar bear video showing an emaciated bear and claimed to be the result of lack of ice... ergo global warming. No way that polar bear could have been diseased or injured. Polar bears only die if the ice melts!
 
tinfoil said:
They never post anything scientific. Ever. Their entire argument consists of an appeal to authority. They refuse to look at any links or science that a skeptic posts so they never even consider the evidence. Even when confronted with evidence, the typical alarmist will simply ignore it. It's a religious belief where everything is seen as evidence for global warming. Take the recent polar bear video showing an emaciated bear and claimed to be the result of lack of ice... ergo global warming. No way that polar bear could have been diseased or injured. Polar bears only die if the ice melts!
Click to expand...

I'm freezing my ass off right now so I'm not going to believe what any liberal says about global warming.
 
tinfoil said:
They never post anything scientific. Ever. Their entire argument consists of an appeal to authority. They refuse to look at any links or science that a skeptic posts so they never even consider the evidence. Even when confronted with evidence, the typical alarmist will simply ignore it. It's a religious belief where everything is seen as evidence for global warming. Take the recent polar bear video showing an emaciated bear and claimed to be the result of lack of ice... ergo global warming. No way that polar bear could have been diseased or injured. Polar bears only die if the ice melts!
Click to expand...
"It is easy to fool someone, but it is almost impossible to convince them that they have been fooled. That is the fraudsters staple psychological tool used by the likes of Al Gore and many others."

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
The global , scientific, consensus is massively in favor of man-made global warming and you look like a bunch of mediaeval twats.
 
moon2012 said:
The global , scientific, consensus is massively in favor of man-made global warming and you look like a bunch of mediaeval twats.
Click to expand...

We understand the government funded scientists are in agreement, but their models do not replicate the climate accurately enough to a degree which they claim. You wouldn't know this because you refuse to look. It's you warmers who look silly constantly bleating on about impending doom that never arrives except in models and adjusted data.
 
tinfoil said:
We understand the government funded scientists are in agreement, but their models do not replicate the climate accurately enough to a degree which they claim. You wouldn't know this because you refuse to look. It's you warmers who look silly constantly bleating on about impending doom that never arrives except in models and adjusted data.
Click to expand...
I have asked most of them, at one time or another, to which of the four RCP scenarios outlined in the IPCC AR5 do they subscribe to, not one of them is capable of answering that relatively simple question.
988bb639d8b3894ad42a0118e8fc12cb.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
tinfoil said:
We understand the government funded scientists are in agreement, but their models do not replicate the climate accurately enough to a degree which they claim. You wouldn't know this because you refuse to look. It's you warmers who look silly constantly bleating on about impending doom that never arrives except in models and adjusted data.
Click to expand...

Well- we'll err on the side of caution, thank you- and if the worst happens we'll kick the likes of maggot out of the lifeboat.
 
There are few, if any, scientists with more experience than world leading sea level expert Prof. Nils-Axel Mörner. Few scientists have scientifically published as much on sea level as Mörner has.

Yet because he rejects the alarmist scenarios touted by the media and alarmist IPCC scientists, the Swedish professor has long been the target of vicious attack campaigns aimed at discrediting him, yet to little effect.

Mörner, who headed the Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics (P&G) Department at Stockholm University from 1991 to 2005, has studied sea level his entire career, visiting 59 countries in the process.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nils-Axel_Moerner



Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
There are few, if any, scientists with more experience than world leading sea level expert Prof. Nils-Axel Mörner. Few scientists have scientifically published as much on sea level as Mörner has.

Yet because he rejects the alarmist scenarios touted by the media and alarmist IPCC scientists, the Swedish professor has long been the target of vicious attack campaigns aimed at discrediting him, yet to little effect.

Mörner, who headed the Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics (P&G) Department at Stockholm University from 1991 to 2005, has studied sea level his entire career, visiting 59 countries in the process.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nils-Axel_Moerner



Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
http://notrickszone.com/2018/02/04/...rps-ipcc-false/#sthash.eJT3MRDG.fwCCQ607.dpbs

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
moon2012 said:
Scab maggot is trying to sell the lie that a sea-level rise of 1.5mm means a nice even spread of calm water around the entire globe .
He's getting more and more desperate to shore up his position of denial.
First islander that loses a family to drowning should seek him out and lynch him.
Click to expand...

No need to run around moving the goalposts, idiot....we can say with confidence that its impossible to measure the sea level with the accuracy to within 0.5 mm.....
 
tinfoil said:
We understand the government funded scientists are in agreement, but their models do not replicate the climate accurately enough to a degree which they claim. You wouldn't know this because you refuse to look. It's you warmers who look silly constantly bleating on about impending doom that never arrives except in models and adjusted data.
Click to expand...

Government funded scientists says it all. It shouldn't surprise anyone what those government funded scientists say. They're going to provide the answers those doing the funding want to hear or magically the funding goes away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top