Latest AMS paper shows sea level rise to be less than 1.5mm/year

No need to run around moving the goalposts, idiot....we can say with confidence that its impossible to measure the sea level with the accuracy to within 0.5 mm.....

1.5 mm = 1/16" or about the thickness of a one of the yellow envelopes with the metal tab that holds the flap down.


envelope.jpg
 
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we can expect the oceans to rise between 11 and 38 inches (28 to 98 centimeters) by 2100, enough to swamp many of the cities along the U.S. East Coast"

"When sea levels rise rapidly, as they have been doing, even a small increase can have devastating effects on coastal habitats. As seawater reaches farther inland, it can cause destructive erosion, wetland flooding, aquifer and agricultural soil contamination, and lost habitat for fish, birds, and plants."

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/sea-level-rise/

Always easy to ping pong climate deniers, fortunately for those that recognize climate change the preponderance of scientific evidence rests with our argument, actually, last told, 97% of climate change science
 
Government funded scientists says it all. It shouldn't surprise anyone what those government funded scientists say. They're going to provide the answers those doing the funding want to hear or magically the funding goes away.

Oh, so I guess studies financed by such as the coal industries would be better indicators, got it
 
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we can expect the oceans to rise between 11 and 38 inches (28 to 98 centimeters) by 2100, enough to swamp many of the cities along the U.S. East Coast"

"When sea levels rise rapidly, as they have been doing, even a small increase can have devastating effects on coastal habitats. As seawater reaches farther inland, it can cause destructive erosion, wetland flooding, aquifer and agricultural soil contamination, and lost habitat for fish, birds, and plants."

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/sea-level-rise/

Always easy to ping pong climate deniers, fortunately for those that recognize climate change the preponderance of scientific evidence rests with our argument, actually, last told, 97% of climate change science

https://www.westernjournal.com/global-warming-predictions-proven-wrong-97-4-time/

The climate change hoax pushers could flip a coin and get it right more often.
 
If that islander is too stupid to get out of the way of a 1.5mm oncoming tidal wave that takes a year to develop then I'd say Natural Selection took care of him.

Let's say that islander is 6' tall. Based on how much the increase/year is (1/16") and assuming he's an 18 year old adult, he'd have to live until he was 978 years old before he drowned.
 
Let's say that islander is 6' tall. Based on how much the increase/year is (1/16") and assuming he's an 18 year old adult, he'd have to live until he was 978 years old before he drowned.

The good news is that he has 960 years to move to higher ground.
 
Of course. Trust me, I'm not going to check your arithmetic on this.:cool:

I don't mind saying how I got it.

60" (approximately )to the point to where he would drown * 16 + 18 current age.

I don't think anyone has to worry about the person moon said should do what he said they should do.
 
No need to run around moving the goalposts, idiot....we can say with confidence that its impossible to measure the sea level with the accuracy to within 0.5 mm.....

How would a knuckle dragging prosemite traitor like you know the measurement criteria for anything other than your shekel pouch ?
 
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we can expect the oceans to rise between 11 and 38 inches (28 to 98 centimeters) by 2100, enough to swamp many of the cities along the U.S. East Coast"

"When sea levels rise rapidly, as they have been doing, even a small increase can have devastating effects on coastal habitats. As seawater reaches farther inland, it can cause destructive erosion, wetland flooding, aquifer and agricultural soil contamination, and lost habitat for fish, birds, and plants."

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/sea-level-rise/

Always easy to ping pong climate deniers, fortunately for those that recognize climate change the preponderance of scientific evidence rests with our argument, actually, last told, 97% of climate change science
It is easy to fool someone, but it is almost impossible to convince them that they have been fooled. That is the fraudsters' staple psychological tool used by the likes of Al Gore and many others.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
It is easy to fool someone, but it is almost impossible to convince them that they have been fooled. That is the fraudsters' staple psychological tool used by the likes of Al Gore and many others.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Oh, now show us again the study of some obscure climate denying researcher who you will laud as the most outstanding voice of his generation, yet, if one posts contrary evidence as say provided by NASA you tell us it is irrelevant or imply NASA's information is flawed

Fogcatcher, your as predictable as the sun rising
 
Oh, now show us again the study of some obscure climate denying researcher who you will laud as the most outstanding voice of his generation, yet, if one posts contrary evidence as say provided by NASA you tell us it is irrelevant or imply NASA's information is flawed

Fogcatcher, your as predictable as the sun rising

Just like HM said, it's hard to convince idiots like you that you've been fooled. Anyone that would think Obama was qualified because he's black is a fool. It's clear that foolish thinking transferred to other issues.
 
How would a knuckle dragging prosemite traitor like you know the measurement criteria for anything other than your shekel pouch ?

How would a raghead Palestinian like you know the measurement criteria for anything other than making bombs?
 
Back
Top