Lefty mask scam

Evmetro said:
Gish gallop is a type of evasion, but lefties usually post gish gallop as a substitute for the truth when the truth hurts. When I call out gish gallop, it is either calling out an example of actual gish gallop, or I include it in my list of truth or evidence substitutes. Allegations, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, gish gallop, or propaganda. In the case of your post asking me about gish gallop, it is just simple evasion. You wanted to evade the obvious truth of the opening post, so you chose from my list of evasions. Dodge, deflect, invert, convert, divert, redefine, or otherwise evade. Do you dare address the opening post, or are you going to stick to evading? You are a lefty, so I expect you will evade.
Click to expand...

You have correctly identified the inversion fallacy. Just people (leftists in this case, and usually) projecting their own problems on another.
 
gfm7175 said:
So you agree with me that viruses (without droplets) are in the air? (as they are not forever stuck in/on droplets)
Click to expand...

Nice weaseling you got there. We are talking about how long the viruses can survive without droplets in the air.
 
Evmetro said:
I've noticed that in all threads about masks where mask function is function is discussed, lefties use the n95 as the benchmark when they want to show benefits of wearing masks. The problem though, is that the n95 is not what people are wearing. Forget for a moment that the exhalation valve let's 100% of droplets out unfiltered, just look at the availability of the n95. Why would lefties use the n95 as a reference if it is not being used? Why not look at the simple surgeon masks or cloth masks that people are actually using? Using n95 specs to justify wearing simple cloth masks or surgical masks is a scam. Using n95 filtration specs to do this while also claiming that masks protect others is a scam as well, since the exhalation valve allows unfiltered exhaust. Lefties can't help scamming.
Click to expand...

In case anybody has lost track of what the thread topic is.
 
Evmetro said:
Indeed, I forgot to post my usual prediction in the opening post, so I will post it now. I predict that lefties will dodge, deflect, divert, invert, convert, redefine, or otherwise evade instead of providing a straight answer. I'll start an evasion scam thread soon, but this thread is about the mask conflation scam. Do you have any comments on the conflation scam or are you going to use the evasion scam?
Click to expand...

In case anybody forgot about post 3
 
Nordberg said:
Yes they do. How can you be so stubbornly wrong in the face of all the evidence that has been supplied? The virus travels on droplets that masks stop from coming and going.
Click to expand...

Propaganda is not evidence. The N95 specification says why masks do not stop a virus. They don't stay in droplets.

I'm not sick. Neither is 99.97% of the population. Why is everyone forced to wear masks?
 
Nordberg said:
Yes they do.
Click to expand...
No they don't.

Nordberg said:
How can you be so stubbornly wrong in the face of all the evidence that has been supplied?
Click to expand...
The "evidence supplied" has been debunked (in my sig, even).

Nordberg said:
The virus travels on droplets that masks stop from coming and going.
Click to expand...
Not all viruses are on or in droplets, and even for the ones which are, viruses are not forever-bound to droplets... Did you know that droplets can evaporate?


Now, back to the OP... Why do lefties attempt to use the N95 as a reference of mask effectiveness when N95s are NOT WHAT PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY WEARING AROUND??

Care to address the OP?
 
Evmetro said:
I've noticed that in all threads about masks where mask function is function is discussed, lefties use the n95 as the benchmark when they want to show benefits of wearing masks. The problem though, is that the n95 is not what people are wearing. Forget for a moment that the exhalation valve let's 100% of droplets out unfiltered, just look at the availability of the n95. Why would lefties use the n95 as a reference if it is not being used? Why not look at the simple surgeon masks or cloth masks that people are actually using? Using n95 specs to justify wearing simple cloth masks or surgical masks is a scam. Using n95 filtration specs to do this while also claiming that masks protect others is a scam as well, since the exhalation valve allows unfiltered exhaust. Lefties can't help scamming.
Click to expand...

Soooo you didn't use a mask while you were grabbing pussy?

 
gfm7175 said:
No they don't.


The "evidence supplied" has been debunked (in my sig, even).


Not all viruses are on or in droplets, and even for the ones which are, viruses are not forever-bound to droplets... Did you know that droplets can evaporate?


Now, back to the OP... Why do lefties attempt to use the N95 as a reference of mask effectiveness when N95s are NOT WHAT PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY WEARING AROUND??

Care to address the OP?
Click to expand...

Lefties are stuck defending the use of improper ppe for protection from hazmat. This means they will always be stuck presenting propaganda or stuck evading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top