Liberals Versus Ronald McDonald

Status
Not open for further replies.
You were the one that started this Sissy boy. What with your "fuck you". You don't want to be civil and can play that game, and it is "Libertarian Sodomite" you fucking ignorant hack.
This stared long ago, LibTard Sodimist. The Southern Man never forgets or forgives. :)
 
Another example of diverting the topic when you are losing. How typical.

give him a break... he is TRYING to come out of the closet. Just let him get his true feelings out on the board and maybe he will finally admit his innermost desires and stop feeling so ashamed at being attracted to other men.

Its ok for you to be gay SM.... we will not banish you to hell.... we promise...
 
I'm glad that they don't allow smoking in restaurants and bars anymore. I have a right to breathe clean air, not fucking exhaust from a smoldering weed in your pie hole.
It should be up to the property owner, property rights is probably the most basic fundamental right of an economic conservative.

They had non-smoking sections in many restaurants when I was young, like you I hate smoking, never done it, but I always thought that was an ok compromise. Not sure why that kind of balance was never good enough.
 
I used to eat at McDonalds every day (like most people who worked there full time) often twice a day, and that was when I was in the best shape. I didn't even eat healthy either, used to make Dano's McCaesar burger, my own invention, basically a big mac with caesar salad dressing instead of mac sauce and bacon crushed and sprinkled on it. Mmmmm.

I think being active matters a lot more than diet, though it's probably not the best stuff if you aren't too active.
 
I used to eat at McDonalds every day (like most people who worked there full time) often twice a day, and that was when I was in the best shape. I didn't even eat healthy either, used to make Dano's McCaesar burger, my own invention, basically a big mac with caesar salad dressing instead of mac sauce and bacon crushed and sprinkled on it. Mmmmm.

I think being active matters a lot more than diet, though it's probably not the best stuff if you aren't too active.

It's all about the balance of activity + metabolism + diet. Activity and diet matter equally... calorie wise. It just takes a lot of time to lose weight through activity, and none to reduce caloric intake.
 
I am torn.... because if it is the parents responsibility as to what the child (and they themselves) eat... then it should also be up to the parent to pay for appropriate health care costs depending on factors such as obesity. If we are going to provide insurance on the 'group' mentality with no need for qualifications, then sorry... but if you refuse to do so, then I am going to stop you from eating like shit and not exercising. You should not have one without the other. Otherwise there are no consequences for your actions.

As you stated, those who do it upon occasion and don't live on that shit... not really a big deal. But when we look at the obesity rates in the US, obviously far too many people are not being responsible and those of us that eat well and exercise are paying for them through higher health care costs.

Obviously those with incurable diseases such as cancer/aids etc... should have access to health insurance. But for those that are simply obese... they should pay more than their healthier peers.

But Ronald McDonald, and clowns in general, are incredibly active!

They are always jumping and tumbling and doing pratfalls...one would think that would be the active kind of lifestyle parents want their kids to take part in.

And let's not forget all the good the Ronald McDonald Houses do for sick kids.
 
I'm glad that they don't allow smoking in restaurants and bars anymore. I have a right to breathe clean air, not fucking exhaust from a smoldering weed in your pie hole.

And there it goes!! There goes your vaunted, "keep the Government out of private business" argument...right out the window!
 
I think smokers are dirty, nasty people who infringe upon my right to go to any restaurant that I chose. Most toss their smoldering butts out the window to further infringe upon my rights. Fuck them, and fuck you. :pke:

But it's okay for you to infringe on their rights to go to a restaurant of THEIR choice...and the Tightie Rightie double standard raises it's ugly head once again.
 
A public store is a public place. It's up to society to regulate it.

I don't agree and that's a dangerous precedent. What of a business run from your home? That is public, would you want the government regulating that?

That kind of thinking is merely a well meaning way of saying I want to force my way in your business.
Since there is no such entity as "the public," since the public is merely a number of individuals, the idea that "the public interest" supersedes private interests and rights can have but one meaning: that the interests and rights of some individuals take precedence over the interests and rights of others.
 
You two lick each others assholes, then fudge pack. Or is it the other way around. That's all moral normal natural and healthy of course. :good4u:

Now THERE'S the intolerant hate-filled douchebag I've come to know!

Where ya been sissy-boy? Been off playing butt-darts with all the other SC sissy-boy militia members?
 
That said, all fast food locations (and other restaurants) should have calories/fat etc... listed for every item on their menu.


Heart disease is the number one killer of Americans and can be directly linked to obesity.

It will be just a matter of time before something in this health care reform rises to the surface and obese people will have to do something drastic...

Like stop going to McDonald's and eating crap
 
It should be up to the property owner, property rights is probably the most basic fundamental right of an economic conservative.

They had non-smoking sections in many restaurants when I was young, like you I hate smoking, never done it, but I always thought that was an ok compromise. Not sure why that kind of balance was never good enough.

But it's okay for you to infringe on their rights to go to a restaurant of THEIR choice...and the Tightie Rightie double standard raises it's ugly head once again.

Isn't that a little hypocritical? You don't think McDonalds should be banned but you support the banning of smoking.

I presume you drive too? Ban that!

http://www.energyindependencenow.org/pdf/fs/EIN-TobaccoCarExhaust.pdf

To repeat: That property owner has a right to call himself a private club and invite all the filthy smokers in.
 
Now THERE'S the intolerant hate-filled douchebag I've come to know!

Where ya been sissy-boy? Been off playing butt-darts with all the other SC sissy-boy militia members?

I'm tolerant as all hell: you can join into their butt-fest.

And I don't live in South Carolina, sissy boy. :pke:
 
To repeat: That property owner has a right to call himself a private club and invite all the filthy smokers in.

No, the property owner has a right to operate a business free from gov't interference.

If you don't want to go into the establishment, then take your narrow-minded self someplace else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top